User talk:Kirk fraser

Your recent edit to Kirk Frasier (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 23:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Kirk Frasier. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (lemonflash)^talk 00:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kirk Frasier, you will be blocked from editing. User:RandomHumanoid^(talk) 00:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content from Kirk Frasier. If you have a problem with the article, you can discuss the issues on the article's talk page. If, as your username suggests, you either are the subject of the article or connected to him, you may also want to read our guideline on conflict of interest. Confusing Manifestation 00:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kirk Fraser, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. Jehochman ^Talk 13:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rayful Edmond Movie Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rayful Edmond Movie Poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kirk Fraser on Music Video Set.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kirk Fraser on Music Video Set.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ajpolino (talk) 20:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]