User talk:Kingdavid4500

May 2014

Hello, I'm United States Man. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mitzpe Shalem without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! United States Man (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mitzpe Shalem, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. United States Man (talk) 21:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 21:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Tutelary (talk) 21:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mitzpe_Shalem&diff=prev&oldid=609863480

In this edit summary, you used the words "pure libel" to describe reliably sourced content. Is this due to it being possibly defamatory with regards to it? Are you considering legal action? If so, I would like to inform you that making legal threats is against Wikipedia policy and that any editor making a credible claim of legal action are likely to be blocked. Are you? Tutelary (talk) 21:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC) No I'd do not its not a libel by wiki its a libel from the UN, EU, and other foreign actors.[reply]