User talk:Kieronoldham/Archive 33
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kieronoldham. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | → | Archive 40 |
Disambiguation link notification for January 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Jacinto Gutiérrez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Rican.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Infobox/userbox needed
Please make an infobox for this article here Joseph Xing Wenzhi. Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'll get around to it, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 19:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please make me this userbox and you may choose the design: This user prefers CDs to vinyl records as they believe that they are much more durable and easier to use. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done, Davidgoodheart. This is the tool to use.
- You have been doing great work, bravo! Please make an infobox for this article Ihab el-Sherif. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Will do shortly, Davidgoodheart--Kieronoldham (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please make an infobox for this article Françoise Claustre and see if you can more sources to add to it. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Will do shortly, Davidgoodheart--Kieronoldham (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- You have been doing great work, bravo! Please make an infobox for this article Ihab el-Sherif. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done, Davidgoodheart. This is the tool to use.
- Please make me this userbox and you may choose the design: This user prefers CDs to vinyl records as they believe that they are much more durable and easier to use. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Haven't forgotten this, Davidgoodheart. Key.--Kieronoldham (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please make an infobox for this article Duan Weihong. Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 05:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please add some sources to this article Charles M. Waterman (politician). Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Shall do shortly. K. --Kieronoldham (talk) 02:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please check out Death of Miya Marcano as well and make an infobox for this article Murder of Clare Morrison. Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Done, Davidgoodheart. ~ --Kieronoldham (talk) 03:59, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please check out Death of Miya Marcano as well and make an infobox for this article Murder of Clare Morrison. Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Shall do shortly. K. --Kieronoldham (talk) 02:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please add some sources to this article Charles M. Waterman (politician). Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Done, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 05:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Shall do, Davidgoodheart. The article needs a lot of work, too (actual date of disappearance alone). Regards, --Kieronoldham (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Done, Davidgoodheart. I can't find her actual date of birth, however.--Kieronoldham (talk) 01:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Great job, you do well with infoboxes.
Please make an infobox for Murder of Esther Brown when you can.Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)- Shall do, Davidgoodheart. If you can find her actual date of birth though? Surprised how little info. is available for this particular unsolved case by comparison to some others (even decades earlier) which I can bring to mind.--Kieronoldham (talk) 06:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- An infobox has been now made for that article. This article needs two infoboxes, one on top of the other Murders of Kylen Schulte and Crystal Turner. Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. Shall we await consensus upon whether the article is to be kept first, Davidgoodheart? Seems to be reasonable international press coverage, but the case is ongoing.--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please find some more sources for this article Ken Gorman. There are some things that I need to tell you about and ask you soon as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. Shall we await consensus upon whether the article is to be kept first, Davidgoodheart? Seems to be reasonable international press coverage, but the case is ongoing.--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- An infobox has been now made for that article. This article needs two infoboxes, one on top of the other Murders of Kylen Schulte and Crystal Turner. Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Shall do, Davidgoodheart. If you can find her actual date of birth though? Surprised how little info. is available for this particular unsolved case by comparison to some others (even decades earlier) which I can bring to mind.--Kieronoldham (talk) 06:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Great job, you do well with infoboxes.
- Please make some touch ups to this userbox as I didn't create it exactly the way I wanted it. However you want to improve it is OK with me. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Will do.--Kieronoldham (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please remember to add sources to Ken Gorman. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. It's Going to Happen!, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 18:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please make me this userbox: This user remembers glass pop bottles. Please add the image of the small ones that were worth 10 cents. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Aye aye
TonyDavidgoodheart. Old enough to remember the detaching ring pulls on aluminium D&B pop/juice/soda cans myself. Be an intriguing one. --Kieronoldham (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)- Please remember to make the userbox. You are really good at making userboxes. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Will be doing today. Key.--Kieronoldham (talk) 11:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please remember to make the userbox. You are really good at making userboxes. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Aye aye
- Please make me this userbox: This user remembers glass pop bottles. Please add the image of the small ones that were worth 10 cents. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. It's Going to Happen!, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 18:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
William Scott Husel
If you're up for the task, I humbly request some expansive work on the William Husel page; as of 20 January he has had 11 murder charges dismissed from his prior 25 charges. His trial is set for Valentine's Day of this year. I'll see if I can expand on the trial aspect of his case soon as well.
Edd Wesson (talk) 23:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- May do, Edd Wesson. I can certainly chalk the article as one to look at going forward. Regards, --Kieronoldham (talk) 23:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Request for help?
Hi there again @Kieronoldham: I hope you are well. I am just messaging as I am feeling a little low at the moment as I feel I am on the bad end of WP:WIKIHOUNDING and was wondering if you could help me out a bit. The other day I had a disagreement with an editor on the Michael Stone (criminal) page: [1]. The editor then followed me onto the Murder of Billie-Jo Jenkins article, which they hadn't previously edited since 2010, to remove some of the large amount of content I had added from academic and reliable sources: [2]. I then had another talk page disagreement with them over the content but in the sake of compromise I decided to remove the content in question: [3]. Despite this however, they have now gone on to the WP:BLPN page to request to remove much more of the content I have added over the last few days. The user User:Springnuts advised that they were scrutinising my contributions list as I am a WP:FRESHSTART editor: [4]. I just feel a little low about it as they never edit the Billie-Jo article and are only now doing so because they followed me over there from the Michael Stone article. Would it be possible for you to advise me on whether I should be concerned? The Good Dante (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'll look into this. No worries.--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- From what I can see, I wouldn't be too worried, The Good Dante. I very much doubt you are being singled out. As for the Stone case, he's in the news again (as is Bellfield), so that'll naturally attract editors old and new to these articles and of course, any contributors can then look at others' contribution histories. This is just my opinion, but this edit (or the likes) may be worthy of a "one-off"-type entry, but could indeed lead too much of a "speculative" slant (WP:WEIGHT). Could be worthy of inclusion in a created "notes" section ("unsubstantiated rumors" ... "never disclosed to the jury."). Rumors are not really evidence though. I certainly would not add "speculative weight" to an article (much less someone living and accused of murder).
- Don't feel bad or wary. Good to see compromises hopefully being reached. If you feel you are being hounded, be wary, and there are avenues to report this. I don't feel you are being, though. I believe most - if not all - editors detect your efforts are for the benefit of others and of course some content remains unchallenged. Perhaps the editor in question just wants to ensure policies are not being overlooked. (Been challenged and overruled several times myself over the years.) As for WP:FRESHSTART, time'll be your ally and reward here. Hope you stay one here. Be good to work alongside you. :) --Kieronoldham (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for looking into it. Yes the section about the rumour of the affair with the 17 year old was questioned and I agreed to remove it in the end, that's not really what is worrying me. I'm worried that there is now the possibility that a huge amount of the edits that I have added to the Billie-Jo Jenkins article over the past few days will now be deleted. I've recently added a large amount of content which has changed the article from looking like this: [5], to how it is now, which I thought was a considerable improvement. I was only being well-intentioned and trying to research and add a much more detailed summary of the case using archived sources, you see. However I fear they will likely be deleted. The Jenkins case is a complex and often controversial one and so I thought it best to include as much detail about the background of the case as possible, including a section highlighting the controversies that have arisen because of the case. Sadly, I can see they will now be removed. The Good Dante (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Is indeed a complex case (which I recall vividly from my college days) and one which reminds me of others where there is/isn't enough evidence to prove guilt on suspects rightly or wrongly if the suspects exist (Keith Lyon/Clare Morrison/Lindsay Rimer etc.). I don't have this case on my watchlist, but can add and will add it. I'll try and support you as and how I can going forward.--Kieronoldham (talk) 05:57, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yes is an interesting case. Great if you add it to your watchlist, although I’ve now removed all the content I’ve added over the last few weeks as people clearly preferred the previous version. Kind of regret adding any of it now I feel like the 25,000 characters of content was a bit of a waste. The Good Dante (talk) 06:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Is indeed a complex case (which I recall vividly from my college days) and one which reminds me of others where there is/isn't enough evidence to prove guilt on suspects rightly or wrongly if the suspects exist (Keith Lyon/Clare Morrison/Lindsay Rimer etc.). I don't have this case on my watchlist, but can add and will add it. I'll try and support you as and how I can going forward.--Kieronoldham (talk) 05:57, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for looking into it. Yes the section about the rumour of the affair with the 17 year old was questioned and I agreed to remove it in the end, that's not really what is worrying me. I'm worried that there is now the possibility that a huge amount of the edits that I have added to the Billie-Jo Jenkins article over the past few days will now be deleted. I've recently added a large amount of content which has changed the article from looking like this: [5], to how it is now, which I thought was a considerable improvement. I was only being well-intentioned and trying to research and add a much more detailed summary of the case using archived sources, you see. However I fear they will likely be deleted. The Jenkins case is a complex and often controversial one and so I thought it best to include as much detail about the background of the case as possible, including a section highlighting the controversies that have arisen because of the case. Sadly, I can see they will now be removed. The Good Dante (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Don't feel bad or wary. Good to see compromises hopefully being reached. If you feel you are being hounded, be wary, and there are avenues to report this. I don't feel you are being, though. I believe most - if not all - editors detect your efforts are for the benefit of others and of course some content remains unchallenged. Perhaps the editor in question just wants to ensure policies are not being overlooked. (Been challenged and overruled several times myself over the years.) As for WP:FRESHSTART, time'll be your ally and reward here. Hope you stay one here. Be good to work alongside you. :) --Kieronoldham (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- From what I can see, I wouldn't be too worried, The Good Dante. I very much doubt you are being singled out. As for the Stone case, he's in the news again (as is Bellfield), so that'll naturally attract editors old and new to these articles and of course, any contributors can then look at others' contribution histories. This is just my opinion, but this edit (or the likes) may be worthy of a "one-off"-type entry, but could indeed lead too much of a "speculative" slant (WP:WEIGHT). Could be worthy of inclusion in a created "notes" section ("unsubstantiated rumors" ... "never disclosed to the jury."). Rumors are not really evidence though. I certainly would not add "speculative weight" to an article (much less someone living and accused of murder).
- I never thought that, The Good Dante. Matter of fact I just strictly looked at the linked edits you provided. You should (hopefully) reinsert. Looking into the Patsy Morris case you created at the mo. Mind is focused on the William Bonin Freeway Killer case largely at the moment. Poss. 85% finished there. Jenkins case is chalked up for the near future. Regards, --Kieronoldham (talk) 06:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- I cannot delve my mind into several cases at once, The Good Dante. I'll add help going forward. Key.--Kieronoldham (talk) 07:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
In case you didn't see this
This scene Pepsi bottles scene from this 1987 movie shows glass bottles that are the right kind. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know how I should interpret the tone of your header here.--Kieronoldham (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Also, pings dinnae seem to work, Davidgoodheart. Messages on my talk page may be more efficient.--Kieronoldham (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Watch the movie clip and you see will actor Danny Devito grab a glass pepsi bottle that is the right type of bottle that I need you to add an image of. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ah I got that. And the fact the woman is her within Kindergarten Cop(?). Regardless, your title led me to believe a disdainful and haughty instructive, terse instruction. I will see, in time, what is on the Commons to devote my free time, intention and benign betterment for you going forward.--Kieronoldham (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- No worries and no harm done, Davidgoodheart. Seriously though, the title of your message could have been better constructed. :)--Kieronoldham (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ah I got that. And the fact the woman is her within Kindergarten Cop(?). Regardless, your title led me to believe a disdainful and haughty instructive, terse instruction. I will see, in time, what is on the Commons to devote my free time, intention and benign betterment for you going forward.--Kieronoldham (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Watch the movie clip and you see will actor Danny Devito grab a glass pepsi bottle that is the right type of bottle that I need you to add an image of. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Also, pings dinnae seem to work, Davidgoodheart. Messages on my talk page may be more efficient.--Kieronoldham (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kieronoldham. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | → | Archive 40 |