User talk:KendrickIsGOD

October 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nancy Rue have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nancy Rue was changed by KendrickIsGOD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882127 on 2024-10-26T22:19:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Jet Pilot. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Revolt (TV network)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jet Pilot (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 08:40, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KendrickIsGOD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to apologize for my actions and disruptive behavior on the Wikipedia website. I take full responsibility for my actions and pledge that I would not do said actions on the website ever again. As I don’t think I sould be banned from editing indefinitely, I do believe in a 24-168 hour period without editing, however this decision is only made by you and the rest of the moderators and admin on Wikipedia. Again, I want to promise that I will only my editing privileges for edits that are constructive to the website, not destructive. Thank you your understanding and your time. KendrickIsGOD (talk) 16:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declined for lack of response. Feel free to submit a new unblock request when you are ready. -- asilvering (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

KendrickIsGOD (talk) 16:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Can you tell me exactly what you did was wrong and why it violated Wikipedia's policies? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I had vandalized pages regarding 2 of Sean J. Combs’ entities, that being “Revolt” and “Bad Boy Records”. Sean Combs, famously known as Diddy, has been a very controversial person due to the allegations against him. Because of these allegations, I had decided to vandalize the 2 previously mentioned pages. These actions were against Wikipedia’s policies regarding vandalism and for that I would like to apologize and take full responsibility for my actions. I promise to only edit Wikipedia pages only if they benefit Wikipedia and its users and if they are good faith to better help Wikipedia. KendrickIsGOD (talk) 17:46, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give an example of a constructive edit you would make? 331dot (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A constructive edit that I would make is correcting grammar and spelling on pages I come across of newer pages created. Another example would be to add important events and contexts that had happened to the pages of people or places on Wikipedia. Another constructive edit would to be adding more information to stubs and drafts for pages that not as developed as the standards of Wikipedia or to remove vandalism created by other users. KendrickIsGOD (talk) 20:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those are only generic types of constructive edits that people make, not an example. Can you suggest a specific constructive edit, ideally something that shows you understand how sourcing works here, that you would make right now if you could, that could be immediately put into an article and improve it? CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This description does not address your talk page comments (Special:Diff/1253607180 and Special:Diff/1253635829) and inappropriate edit summary (Special:Diff/1257768383). - Aoidh (talk) 03:10, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]