User talk:Keldoo

Watch this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eco2s3-0zsQ Cheers --Gtoffoletto (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FRINGE

You will want to familiarize yourself with this. jps (talk) 03:07, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working to keep the article well-referenced and fringe theory-free in the face of what appears to be a Lazar proponent. I may have acquiesced to one or two of his ideas but it was done, perhaps misguidedly, in the spirit of collaboration, rather than out of any affinity for the subject. Keldoo (talk) 04:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's best to stick to WP:MAINSTREAM sources and not give in to false consensus effects that can happen when "collaborating" as such. Anyway, your headspace seems reasonable, I just wanted to make sure you knew what the guidelines were. Keep up the good work! jps (talk) 11:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And if you ever need help with this sort of thing, there are people active at WP:FTN who can help (where I heard about the issues msyelf!) jps (talk) 11:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Keldoo, I wanted to apologise for the bad experience you are having with those first edits on wikipedia. It can be a bit overwhelming with all the rules and guidelines that must be followed at first. And the articles we are trying to edit together are definitely the worst place to start. Despite the seemingly boneheaded bureaucracy I promise it can be fun and not just constant arguing! Keep at it and sorry your edits are being reverted together with mine. I don't think the other editors are reading what they are reverting at all... Cheers --Gtoffoletto (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Your recent editing history at Bob Lazar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bishonen | talk 16:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]