User talk:KatrinKultur

This is KatrinKultur's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: FuseTar (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

May be notable but certainly needs reliable secondary sources to establish notability. Primary sources aren't sufficient.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FuseTar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FuseTar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 19:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nearlyevil665, I added some sources but wanted to ask whether there is anyone in the community who could help me and check whether I understood it correctly before I resubmit the article? Would be helpful a lot go get some feedback. Thank you! KatrinKultur (talk) 21:10, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KatrinKultur! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil 665 19:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nearlyevil665 thanks for the info. I'll try to learn what are the reliable sources and how to find them. KatrinKultur (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the message. This could be helpful for you: Help:Find sources. nearlyevil 665 10:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Nearlyevil665, it really helped to find additional sources. Overally process of searching for links or published materials is very time consuming. I have submitted the updated version but saw that it had broken the structure I offered. Should I adjust it or it is someone else offering improvements and I should better wait? KatrinKultur (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the message. To be honest, I'm not yet convinced about the draft meeting notability requirements, but feel free to resubmit and someone else will review it. I'm not sure I'm well-placed to make that judgement with the new sources provided. nearlyevil 665 10:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nearlyevil665 thank you tons for the swift answer. Could you please recommend me someone in the community who is from music instruments or experimental instruments area or how I can find such and editor. I thinks that person could help me with further direction. KatrinKultur (talk) 11:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anyone from that field. The common practice is to submit and wait. But if you feel like you want to do something extra, you could try asking over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. nearlyevil 665 11:09, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Then I'll submit and wait but meanwhile will learn how to communicate with other contributors. KatrinKultur (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nearlyevil665 could you please help me with one more thing? some bot came and deleted a picture I chosen for my draft from wikipedia database. what can I do to return that picture? KatrinKultur (talk) 09:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see it has been deleted on Commons for a copyright violation. I'm not really an expert on image deletions, but I found this page which might help you. nearlyevil 665 12:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you@Nearlyevil665 for your support. it's quite complicated to understand how it works. I will try to ask if they can get that picture unarchived. KatrinKultur (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nearlyevil665 Look what I found. There is similar article about a unique instrument https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikasso-Gitarre but it has no significant references at all. I believe I did good job collecting all those pieces and bits in various languages :) But I got additional question, is it allowed to mention luthiers and write article from the luthiers perspective but not the instrument itself as it is here ? https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikasso-Gitarre KatrinKultur (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, unfortunately English Wikipedia has its own standards and other language wikis - their own. I'm not aware about German wiki's standards, but an article in that state would never survive on English Wikipedia. If I were to see an article like that, I'd do nominate it for deletion. See Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. nearlyevil 665 06:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Experimental musical instrument. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Sorry, I'm new, I probably got it wrong. I just saw how previous Keyolin instrument linked and did by analogy linking to personal web site. Should that link to take to another source on the same topic? KatrinKultur (talk) 12:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FuseTar (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources used are reliable. They are promotional pieces likely written by those affiliated with FuseTar (some are the exact same article in various publications).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FuseTar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FuseTar

Hello, KatrinKultur. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FuseTar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FuseTar

Hello, KatrinKultur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FuseTar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]