User talk:Karloff

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Aspartame controversy appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 02:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If i write in wikipedia that Bender Bending Rodríguez says often he has a shiny ass, that's not my opinion, but Bender's. (Karloff (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Other/Previous accounts

Hi. Do you or have you operated other accounts on wikipedia that have edited the same topics or articles as you are now? Such accounts should be declared per wikipedia policy. Thanks, Verbal chat 17:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, and do you have some economic interest in Aspartame? Your interest should not need to be declared per Wikipedia policy, but for respect to a objective discussion. (Karloff (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I have no COI. Do you have links with activists or any anti-aspartame group at all? Also, there are very strong reasons to think you are a sock puppet. If you declare it here then I won't have to take further action. Verbal chat 08:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a sock puppet just when i want to amuse my little child. I don't want childs consume aspartame before an accurate analysis has been made with a serious research. Please, don't attack me and just discuss ideas. That's what we are here for. If even i was linked to an anti-aspartame group (and i am not), that's not a conflict of interest, and yours looks like a WP:ATTACK(Karloff (talk) 18:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

My what looks like an attack? You brought up COI. Can you confirm one last time that you are not User:Immortale? Thanks, Verbal chat 08:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes [[[User:Karloff|Karloff]] (talk) 21:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)]

Sockpuppet

Please see this sockpuppet investigation.OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 04:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i've seen it now. It's interesting, i'm trying to understand what's this all about. [[[User:Karloff|Karloff]] (talk]) 21:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)]

Alanova moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alanova, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alanova

Hello, Karloff. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alanova, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alanova

Hello, Karloff. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alanova".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]