Jump to content

User talk:Kablammo/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

Proglacial lakes of Minnesota

Updated DYK query On 5 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Proglacial lakes of Minnesota, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 17:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Nice move =). Heck, I didn't even know people even looked at my talk page (lol). Thanks for the revert; it's much appreciated! Arknascar44 ¡Hablar Conmigo! 01:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Driftless Area

I got this message and thought you might be interested in taking a look as well. -Ravedave 16:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I have been busy with this article. You do serious MN articles, as I do serious IA articles. The article, at present dissolves into stupid stuff at the end, but my stuff at the top is approximately good. The past two days have been educational, learning things about all things glacial. Right now, I'm coping with the stuff that makes Fulton, Illinois a continental divide, inasmuch as this is the place that the Upper Mississippi River flows over bedrock. This is Whiteside County, Illinois. C.f. retrograde Apple River (Illinois). - User:Ace Telephone
I took a brief look at it-- it's looking good, but I'll have a few suggestions when I get a chance. Kablammo 13:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

border & geographic oddities of the USA

a while back I stumbled on a very interesting page on something like " US States with the most boundaries" etc...but I can't find it again ! it was a most interesting collaboraton of trivia ! Can you point me to it ( given your interest in US geography ) ? Feroshki 09:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know the answer. Let me know if you find it. Kablammo 13:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Crowded House

Hi! I've seen you editing Crowded House related articles, and would like to invite you to join WikiProject Crowded House, an effort by Wikipedians to improve the band's coverage on the encyclopedia. Please consider signing up here. 
--lincalinca 06:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 08:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I-35 Bridge RV

Sorry I reverted your revert on I-35W Mississippi River bridge, my page reloaded and I didn't realize someone else had already taken care of the vandalism!

IamMarkBlake 00:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem. It happens to everyone. Thanks for keeping an eye on this page. Kablammo 00:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Minneapolis bridge collapse

Ta! Under the circumstances you mentioned, I wouldn't even bother watching it if not for you and a very few others editing helpfully there. Cheers! Gwen Gale 12:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

On the I-35W page, you can just let the MiszaBot do its job

Although your Archive edits on Talk:I-35W Mississippi River bridge were useful, its more efficient to tweak the parameters to the MiszaBot and let it do the archiving for you. The reason it didn't run yesterday was that it was wrongly changed Archive back to page 1[2], but that was already well over its maximum size and it wasn't able to create a page 2 as it was already been created. I've now split the big page and fixed the parameters. Tonight, it should archive every thread that hasn't been touched in a day. -- KelleyCook 21:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

unmerge Replacement I35W...

Someone ignored the merge proposal and deleted the article again. I don't want to violate 3RR, so I'd appreciate your help. Thanks.--Appraiser 17:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC) Thanks.:

I have restored them to allow discussion per Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages#Proposing_a_merger but don't know if we really need two articles. I want to hear more and I hope the advocates of merger (as well as the opponents) will provide that rather than taking further action without discussion. Kablammo 17:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Ships Template Assistance

Happy to help out. There seems to be a bit too much emotion and not enough research in the discussions. Is there a moderator for this group? Looks like it could use a cool head. Please feel free to drop me a line if I can be of any assistance anywhere else. Cheers, Jmvolc 02:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

List of Minnesota state parks

Hello, I'm trying to get List of Minnesota state parks to featured status, all I need is for people to review the facts about the parks. I made a work list of parks split into groups of 7 on the talk page, any help would be appreciated. Thanks! -Ravedave 04:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. I appreciate it, Tiptoety 23:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:SHIPS

I cleaned up the participants list recently, and noticed you're not on it. Sign up already! :) Maralia 05:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Help me out here

I need an answer to a question, so I went to the talk page for the USS Saratoga (CV-3)...and ya. So here goes-How did she sink? I mean, I know it was at the Bikini Atoll tests with an A-bomb in test Baker, but I've heard (NOT confirmed it) that she flew a half-mile out of the water! before taking 7 1/2 hours to go down. Just want to see if that is true, seeing as I can't find it ANYWHERE on the internet-all they say is that she sunk... Thanks for your help. the_ed17 23:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I’m not sure of the answer to your question. There is a lot of information available on Operation Crossroads. The atomic tests at Bikini Atoll were filmed, and you can find film of the actual explosion. [3][ [4][5] I have never heard that the vessel was lifted out of the water; that seems very improbable, and the films do not show vessels being lifted up.[6] The explosion did create a half-mile wide column of water.
Saratoga did take hours to sink.[7] She rests on the bottom, and is easily accessible to SCUBA divers.[8][9] Many ships survived Able (an air blast) very well, but the underwater test of Baker sank many of them due to underwater damage. I read somewhere that is what sank the Arkansas (or was it Nevada?), and that her hull was smashed, but I don't remember where I saw that. Kablammo 00:45, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
I remembered where I saw the reference to Arkansas. Here's some more information on Crossroads, from Ireland, Bernard (1996). Jane's Battleships of the 20th Century. New York: HarperCollins. pp. 186–87. ISBN 0 0047 0997 7.:
  • US capital ships present included Arkansas, New York, and Nevada in addition to Saratoga
  • The Able test (an air blast) did little damage to the armored citadel of Nevada only three ship lengths from ground zero
  • Baker involved a similar weapon detonated 90 feet below the surface (lagoon was only 31 fathoms deep max)
  • As explosion was underwater, the shock was transmitted directly to the hulls, without attenuation
  • column of water 1/2 mile wide (this is from another source) went 2500' into the air
  • A wave 94' high was measured 1000' away (you can see ships heeling from the wave in the videos)
  • Arkansas, 250 yards from center, was "crushed as if by a tremendous hammer blow from below"
There is also a book by Richard Rhodes entitled Dark Sun which contains information on these tests, but I don't believe Saratoga was specifically mentioned. (I no longer have the book.) Nothing I have seen mentions warships being thrown in the air, but the vaporization of much of the water in the atoll near ground zero, a 90'+ high wave, and most importantly the underwater shock wave, caused catastophic damage. I hope this helps. Kablammo 00:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thanks for the trying at the VERY least! It was just random curiousity on my part, so thanks-it pretty much answered the Q. the_ed17 01:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
And it was the Arkansas that was sunk due to underwater damage becausethe tough old Nevada survived both tests--and then was sunk by naval gunfire. the_ed17 01:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

wrong usertalk for post

no worries. I believe that he might have copied some of the code from my page to edit for himself, but missed some spots. If you click on the words "talk" or "user" it takes you to his page. no harm done. enjoy your day ! MatthewYeager 23:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Re:I-35W bridge

Sorry if I made a mistake, but I thought that edit is a content removal done in bad faith. So, please revert my mistake. Thanks Chris! my talk 23:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Leaf Mountains

My best resource, and the one I use most often, is a book called Minnesota Place Names, A Geographical Encyclopedia. It's published by the Minnesota Historical Society, which claims that it's the best book of its kind anywhere. It's pretty remarkable, compiled by a surveyor and geologist named Warren Upham between about 1910 and 1920, back when a lot of pioneers were still alive to tell the stories of the state. This book describes the Leaf Hills Moraines in Otter Tail County: "running southeast from Fergus Falls to the south line of the county and thence east and northeast to East Leaf Lake, a distance of 50 miles." These hills for the most part haven't been named, but are said to provide views of a three-county area. Do you think this is the range of hills you're describing? If so, I'll scrape together what resources I can find and put up a stub class article which others can improve.Spottacus 00:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Okay, buddy. There's a start at Leaf Hills Moraines. I think that's a better, more accurate title than Leaf Mountains, though the latter should probably be redirected to this article. I probably won't write any more tonight, but I hope to get something written and slapped up there this weekend.Spottacus 00:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Nice start. I'm eager to see what you come up with. I'll be watching.Spottacus 22:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
See my reply - I'd do it without a second thought. All are welcome.Spottacus 18:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
News flash - check out this illustration for the Leaf Mountains article: [10]Spottacus 20:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
And it's public, as it's from Upham's monograph. Kablammo 20:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Have you noticed what CJLippert did for this article? I asked for his help with a related matter because he's well educated in the Ojibwa language, and he's gone through some of my old work, unasked, and made corrections to the Ojibwa versions of place names and Indian people. He's very good. Have you ever worked with him before? Spottacus 01:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I have not, but his contributions are very good. They raise the standard of articles from interesting to actual scholarship. He may not realize the degree to which he will now be in demand! Kablammo 12:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Your user ID...

...is as appropriate as any I can think of, to be editing subjects ranging from the Big Bang to the I-35W bridge collapse. To coin a phrase, it's dynamite. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 00:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the note-- I didn't know my contributions were that explosive! (But I did once provoke quite a response by an edit to Big Bang; see [11]) Maybe I'll go back to quieter subjects lest I get a reputation. Kablammo 00:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
That's pretty funny. A red-link user blanks the page and then gripes because you un-blanked it. That was his "parting shot", I guess, as he was permanently blocked later that same day. [12] Speaking of Big Bangs, I used to have a self-made user box that stated I believe in the Big Bang Theory. I changed it to point its illustration to a more specific target, which you can find under "VANDALISM" on my user page if you're interested. :) In fact, it occurred to me that the full-sized version of that picture would suit your user page just fine. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 00:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
So now you want me to have a user page?? How about this picture:[13] Kablammo 01:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
That's also a good illustration of the concept. You're not required to have a user page. In fact, your redirection from user page to user talk page follows the recommended procedure when you don't want a user page. I was just envisioning a user page filled with the image of something exploding... or perhaps something the opposite of that, for contrast. A little girl picking flowers, for example. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Like Daisy (television advertisement)? Kinda ties the concepts together . . . Kablammo 01:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Precisely. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Red River Trails: surviving fragments

Kablammo, there are supposedly fragments of the trail still extant. I've run across signs or markers in Ramsey, Minnesota at a roadside rest area, in Breckenridge, Minnesota, and on the side of US Route 2 west of Grand Forks, North Dakota which claim that the trails are still there and visible to the naked eye. Do your resources mention these still-existing segments of trail? Would it be worthwhile to mention them? Spottacus 19:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I think that would be a good idea. If you can add anything, feel free. I'd like to get this article "finished" and those would be good additions. (Maybe at the end of the End of the Trails section, either within it or after it.) Kablammo 19:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Another name question . . .

I'll take a crack at it.Spottacus 00:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup templates

Just to let you know that most cleanup templates, like "unreferenced", "fact", "cleanup", "trivia"etc., are best not "subst"ed. See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 21:59 14 September 2007 (GMT).

Need your wisdom

I think I'm going to change my user name. Please do me the favor of consulting with me at my talk page. Spottacus 01:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Louis Riel

Thank you for the clean up on this article.

Louis Riel has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. I am in the process of adding inline citations to help the review process not do a FARC. Are you able to help keep this article at feature article quality? SriMesh | talk 02:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Meetup RSVP

Minnesota Meetup
Sunday, 2007-10-07, 1:00 p.m. (13:00)
Pracna on Main
117 Main SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Map
Please pass this on! RSVP here.

Leonid Hurwicz

Hi, Kablammo. You are the greatest, thank you for all your work on this article. I counted five chars over the requirement but yes it is close or a tad under depending on who counts how. The sentence you asked about is almost covered in the Hughes MPR article and could be reworded to match. I am wiped after sorting through the Cowles biographies and may not get back to this this morning but I can look later on. No I have not yet seen a bio. Nobel Foundation may put one together sometime. I looked to find his family and teachers but didn't get very far sorry. -Susanlesch 16:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Minnesota Economics (2006) published an article with a short bio. Re: whose work, no it really is not mine but it is becoming a sourced article thanks to you and others and closer to B class biography though it still needs help from someone who has studied economics for more than zero minutes. Thanks though. -Susanlesch 00:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Updated DYK query On 20 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leonid Hurwicz, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 09:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Have you thought of nominating Leonid Hurwicz at WP:GAC?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

It had not occurred to me at least. I'll leave that to Susan, as she did most of the work. Regards, Kablammo 13:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Heh. Without you, Kablammo, nobody would be asking this question. :-) I will send a note to TonyTheTigers's page. I guess we can do it despite the missing economics bits. Maybe I can add a to do list to the article sometime. -Susanlesch 01:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Random smiley

Thanks, Kablammo.
For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award originated by User:Pedia-I. Ce n'est pas un parapluie.
(Explanation and Disclaimer). -Susanlesch 00:38, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


Manifest Destiny

I'd say go ahead and restore the material. I glanced at the user who deleted that stuff's contributions and concluded he wasn't a crackpot, so I didn't feel like delving any further into the dispute. But if that editor has a problem with the restoration, it can be worked out on the talk page, as it should have been before it was removed. Yes, I hate when the schoolkids are studying the American West--Oregon Trail is another popular target, though it's Sacagawea who's getting the worst of it lately. I had that article semi-protected again recently. The problem with all the petty vandalism is legit content goes missing and nobody notices for months. I'm still backtracking through the edit history of Sacagawea to find some content that went missing months ago and I don't know yet if it's from a rewrite or because it got vandalized and some well-meaning person deleted it. Gosh I hate when people don't check the page history before deleting vandalism! Anyway, yes, you might see about page protection. Keep up the good work! Katr67 23:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

I got the page semi-protected today. I got tired of rvving. Katr67 15:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Good move. Very few edits all summer, then 200+ in 2 months, none of them (except ours) substantive. Kablammo 16:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

About Ronald Mcdonald

I just added that Ronald was a happy clown and it was reverted. Is that not a tale of veracity. I don't see the lack of legitamacy as these so called "administrators" point out.

You mistook my edit for another one. Regards, Kablammo 01:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Kablammo, hey I was wondering, how long do you guys stay on this website. I mean with my workflow not abating anytime immeniently, I can't find time for anything anymore. How do you do it.  :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermannn21 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
It ebbs and flows. Full moon tonight = a lot of vandalism. Good luck with your edits. Kablammo 01:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Your Mannerisims

Why do you guys behave and act like machines. You are human, right?

We use standard templates-- they make it go faster. More stilted prose, but most vandals ignore the warnings anyway. They're just given to enable a block, but sometimes the vandals actually pay attention.
You should sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ~~~~ so that people know who is writing. They substitute your username automatically. Regards, Kablammo 01:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On October 30, 2007, a fact from the article Lake Superior National Marine Conservation Area, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Packet (sea transport)

The UK Post Office Packet Service is now a separate article and there is a more general article, Packet (sea transport). Packet trade now needs some sorting out, which I am not qualified to do. Any more thoughts, please? --Vernon White . . . Talk 00:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, and good work. I posted some thoughts at Talk:Packet_trade#Merger. Kablammo 00:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Notable Noyes Hall?

Help me out here. What makes this notable? Is every building on the NRHP named after a non-notable former institutional employee happen to be notable? There are dozens of such buildings in that town and more on that campus alone, so it is not unique. It isn't even mentioned on that school's own page, perhaps the best place for a list of its "notable" buildings. If it does belong on the Faribault page, shouldn't it be under a heading other than "institutions" since it doesn't happen to be one? Perhaps under "historic structures" or attached to the deaf school listing on that page? I'm curious, what am I missing here? Vespid 03:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

While the standard of notability for mention in an article is not the same as the standard for a stand-alone article,[14] I restored it because of the NRHP listing; there have been a number of articles listed for AfD which have survived because of that listing. (I'll invite someone active with NRHP properties to comment here as well.) As you mentioned, Faribault, Minnesota is rich in such sites, which are a distinguishing feature of the community.
Either of your suggestions for placement within the article are fine and I agree with where you've put it. Kablammo 08:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I revised the wording within the main Faribault article, but I think mention of the buildings would be more appropriate within the Minnesota State Academies article. The institution also contains another building listed on the National Register, the Administration Building/Girls' Dormitory. On the other side of Highway 60, the School for the Blind contains an NRHP building, and the State School for the Feeble-Minded has a hospital building listed on the National Register. Three buildings at Shattuck-St. Mary's are listed on the National Register as well. I think listing the individual buildings under their institutions' articles would make it easier to give a more detailed account of their construction and notability, as opposed to doing it in the main Faribault article. The Faribault article could get rather long if details of all the historic buildings (and there are quite a few!) were mentioned. As an aside, I think I might have to go down to Faribault and Northfield this weekend for an NRHP photo tour -- even though I haven't finished Red Wing and Chaska yet. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 14:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I will defer to you two on that. Thanks for your input. Kablammo 14:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Also, as far as National Register articles in general are concerned, the general consensus is that any building listed on the National Register is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. The National Register listing process involves a comprehensive nomination form submitted to the National Park Service, and the NPS reviews the submission to make sure it actually fits the criteria. That doesn't necessarily that we have to write one article separately for each NRHP property -- for example, I wrote one article to cover Cuyuna Iron Range Municipally-Owned Elevated Metal Water Tanks, the name of the Multiple Property Submission, even though each tower is separately listed on the National Register. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 14:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

confused

i saw i made a lot of edits that i didn't make...someone is editing on my account help!66.202.56.138 20:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

DYK: Turret deck ship

Updated DYK query On 15 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Turret deck ship, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai 13:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

(Please see Turret deck ship discussion for some of my comments, and yes ... it is good to be back. Jmvolc (talk) 22:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC))

Crusing On

Hi Kablammo.

This is quite an abstract general speculation. Not really about the Cruise Ship article, but about the goals of Wiki, etc. I've been a little perplexed about what to do with the new crop given the assignment to contribute to a Wiki article. Are these students interested in Wiki or solely in completing their assignments? If students get a negative reception, for example with lots of requests for Wikification, it's liable to create unnecessary controversy.

It seems like DancinChica0514 might stay around. Responsive, pleasant. Great!

But her major source is one book, and she's written a book report about it. She doesn't mention any of the themes in the rest of the article. She doesn't seem to have read or be responding to any of the comments in Talk. (She, personally, seems to be interested in the process, that's not the focus, here.) Wiki can't have a book report inserted into articles for every student who has a class assignment.

What's to be done? It seems that teachers are directing students to use Wiki for teachers' own ends, but that students aren't getting instruction about how to contribute. Since the goal of Wiki is not to provide assistance to teachers, there's a problem. Maybe it will all work itself out, after an excessive number of students complain to teachers that "mean editors" wouldn't let them complete their assignments. But that wouldn't be great for Wiki press. Hmm. Oh, well.

Regards,

Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 23:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the post. Last May a professor at the University of Minnesota had students write Wikipedia articles. See User:1013-josh/archive. For the most part they created new articles and had appropriate guidance from their prof, who had a well-structured approach to the task. After they started, their work attracted assistance from a number of members of the Minnesota WikiProject, which led to a good collaborative process.
What happened here did not appear to have the same degree of oversight (aside from you and me) but the editor was very responsive and did a creditable job. Ordinarily it might have been better to have them start new articles (and her additions could easily stand as one) but this article gets so little attention that the leeway you and I gave her seemed appropriate. But to throw a new editor into Barry Bonds, for example, could be counterproductive, especially if no guidance was given.
I think her contributions could be condensed and sourced to multiple authorities, but of course that will depend on her, or other volunteers, to do the work. But overall it was positive, and we can hope that she sticks around. Kablammo (talk) 23:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

A note of gratitude

Thank you so much; you are appreciated. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for responding to my distress over the COI incident. When Wiki goes haywire, it's nice to have friends and to know that others understand how upsetting such a thing can be. Next, I am going to work on my response to the bot-folk about why it is so troubling, but first, my thanks. Kind regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I looked for a link and learned that a pansy is in fact a violet. Who says you can't learn anything on Wikipedia? Kablammo (talk) 20:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Pee Wee Herman

Hi. I am trying to put together a checkuser request in relation to the "Pee Wee Herman" vandal, with a view to getting the underlying IPs blocked (I have range blocked some IPs used by the vandal(s) with limited success). I am putting together a list of sockpuppets and their edits here. As I see that you have been involved in dealing with this vandalism, I am letting you know and please feel free to contribute to the list. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 23:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

I was not aware the user was a vandal until I looked at the user's other edits. The edit(s) I reverted, and the posts to my talk page, were relatively benign. Kablammo (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query On 20 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Trunk deck ship, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Daniel 08:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Bible and dates

I cannot find on my talk page where you answered. In Any event, it used reputable sources. Find better ones and subsitute your information. Mattisse 01:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

ABC

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I, Woody, do hereby award this barnstar to Kablammo for keeping an eye on the WP:TFA Andrew Browne Cunningham. The inevitable vandalism that the main page article recieves was reverted quickly and the users appropriately warned. Thankyou very much. Woodym555 (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
By the way, thanks for the nod to WP:ERROR. I have put it in my watchlist for future reference now. Thanks again. Woodym555 (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Rock Harbor and Windigo

Kablammo, a random thanks is due for your contribs to the Rock Harbor article - it is greatly improved. Also, thanks for adding coordinates to Windigo, and for providing one of the best edit summaries I've ever read. Glad you enjoy Wik enough to type that out...you made my day! Keeper | 76 17:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

It was not original. Years ago I read it at an outhouse at the Lake Desor campground, and it has never left my mind. (And now that you have read it, it may stay in your mind also.) Thanks for the post. Kablammo 19:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Antichrist essay

You have deleted the Antichrist essay without checking the discussion page. The page was already cleared through wikipedia. Check your resources next time. Thanks.

12.5.63.8 05:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I have checked it, and your talk page. Essays expressing personal points of view do not belong on Wikipedia. Kablammo 11:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

RFC on Bruce1333

I've started an RFC on this user, as he is continuously adding the same block of text into the Antichrist article, to the point where it is becoming disruptive. He has ignored all attempts to communicate with him, so I've started an RFC; Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bruce1333. You dealt with the user while he was an IP address (12.5.63.8), so I thought I should include you. Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 17:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[15] - Thanks for that. I had no idea how I managed to break the hash numbering. Cheers buddy. ScarianTalk 13:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Actually I think I started it, by adding indented comments. I think that breaks the numeric progression. Kablammo (talk) 13:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

That was a weird one; thanks :-) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

You are more than welcome. I don't know how you manage to do all that you do on (and for) Wikipedia, but I for one am glad that you do. Regards, Kablammo 18:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, Kablammo, that was a very kind thing to say, and I appreciate it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking of leaving it there to see how long it would take an admin to notice :-) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I should have left it-- then the block would be permanent. It almost burned up my little laptop loading it. Kablammo (talk) 19:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

There are those days where fighting the vandals and the POV pushers and the meanies is just exhausting and distracting; today is one of those. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

At the risk of appearing too fulsome in my comments, I am an FOS;[1] she can always count on me for assistance. Kablammo (talk) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

LOL !! Thanks, that's so kind of you :-) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

If you don't watch out, I'll find some clever person to enclose FOS and a picture of a bird's-foot violet in a rectangle that I can market it a userbox. Kablammo (talk) 20:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
You must know that true FOS fans always follow WP:FN, LOL !! footnote punctuation fixed above. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
"FOS fans"? Is that like a "PIN number"?[2]
I could claim that I was trying to catch you, but your BS detector would go haywire.(too easy)
Even if I were to add such a userbox, no doubt you would demand citation to multiple reliable third-party sources. Kablammo (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
uh, oh, my prose stinks. Struck redundancy. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:20, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I probably won't get there 'til tonight, but I will get there! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I guess you noticed a small distraction on my talk page, sigh. But I did get my Christmas tree, and I *will* get to it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I have, with some degree of astonishment. Get your tree up and get into the spirit of the season. Kablammo (talk) 18:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Finally! Finished the tree, shoveled the first snow storm, and looked at Red River Trails and Geology of Minnesota. Both of them have perfectly fine citations, and on the finer points of whether or not to include the underscore for no author and how to alphabetize, I can tell you that I've never encountered anyone on FAC who reviews or cares (except me, and I don't care that much). I don't care for the underscore, but there's nothing wrong with using it. I would alphabetize by whatever you use in the footnote, so the reader knows how to find it. Brown Dog affair came through FAC with a system that used "no byline" when there was no author, which I also thought wasn't needed, but really it doesn't matter. It went to the mainpage without the reference list alphabatical, and no one noticed or cared. What you're doing is fine; the only reminder is to ask Brighterorange (talk · contribs) to run his script to fix your page ranges; the hyphens between the page numbers should be endashes. Another system you can use, if you prefer it, is at History of evolutionary thought, currently at FAC, but I don't think it's necessary to do that much work. What you've done so far is fine. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

  1. ^ "Fan of Sandy"
  2. ^ [1]

Thank you

I'm really grateful for your suggestions on the conservation tillage web site (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_tillage_Systems). I did add some links and when I have more time, I'll add more! Can you help me with something. How do you get started with using the references. Can you show me how to get started on this page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sand-based_athletic_fields. You can see that we have some foot notes but they are not really linked to the references. Best Regards SoilMan2007 (talk) on December 6 2007.

sorry

just my mistake :( —aitias •discussion• 15:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

It happens to all of us. Looks like the blanker has stopped-- at least for a while. [spoke too soon]. Kablammo 15:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Minnesota Demograpics

Moved to Talk:Minnesota#Minnesota_Demograpics

Red River Trails Thanks

Hello. Actually, in regards to your note, I am a new user, but I have written for money and edited magazines, tech documents, etc., for over 35 years (wow, I'm impressed). I've made a few changes to Wikipedia so far, but I'm only doing minor edits, and am trying to stay within the guidelines.

By the way, I have been studying the Red River Trails for some time. I'm planning to do a video on them, once I retire. If you're interested, I have a Google map of free campgrounds in MN, many of which are near the various Trails. It is at [http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&ie=UTF8&msa=0&msid=104713187722086232164.00043b1fed1f6d3d24834&z=6&om=1 ] User:Dale662 —Preceding comment was added at 15:33, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Sad day

Kablammo, could you possibly help me with the user who has been escalating and is now prolonging whatever on the talk page of Star Tribune? -Susanlesch (talk) 16:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi, Kablammo. I am going out as am sick as a god again. Off and on since I quit my job. Talk to you later I hope. Many thanks for your reply, on my talk page. -Susanlesch (talk) 18:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Good luck to you-- hope to see you back contributing. Take care of yourself. Kablammo (talk) 18:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. You are the one who taught be to focus on other people's needs once in a while. -Susanlesch (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben

Fine with me. The article could always use some expansion. Black Tusk 04:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

To my knowledge the Ottawa Graben and the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben mean the same thing. See [16] Perhaps the other names should be added to the article? Black Tusk 17:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
That's a good map. What I was wondering is, is the Ottawa-Bonnchere Graben just part of the Ottawa Graben? That map and this are not clear to me. If there are the same, I suggest changing the into to add "also known as the Ottawa Graben" and creating a redirect at Ottawa Graben. Kablammo (talk) 18:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
See the cite here which shows the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben as "OBG". That's the same thing as the other map link above. But if the Ottawa Graben were another graben, it's probably part of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben system. See here and here as well. Black Tusk 18:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello, adding a bit per Kablammo's request. I'm no expert on this, but looking at the papers it seems to me that Ottawa Graben and the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben are indeed one and the same. The name Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben seems to have originated with Marshall Kay in 1942; the cited ref to Kumarapeli (the 1981 Smithsonian paper) seems to use both names indiscriminately. This fairly recent paper uses the name Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben. And google gets 250 hits on Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben vs. 139 for Ottawa Graben, somewhat to my surprise. So, near as I can tell, they are the same thing, and the name Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben has both precedence as well as greater use. So, I guess I'd support using that as the article name, and redirecting Ottawa Graben to it. Cheers Geologyguy (talk) 19:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

DYK nom

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On December 17, 2007, a fact from the article Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 15:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

--Appraiser (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

St. Anthony Laboratory

Kablammo, do you live close enough to Minneapolis to join Elkman and Appraiser and me for a tour at the UofM laboratory on the Mississippi in downtown sometime before mid-January? Assuming the UofM has time to give a tour and that any of us can make it. This is not universally considered to be the best time of year but you seem to know a lot about the area. I don't plan at this time to ask anyone else. Yes, it is my guess a reporter was at the meetup but how would I know. -Susanlesch (talk) 15:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Something tells me this is not ever going to happen before mid-January. I hope I am wrong about that. -Susanlesch (talk) 10:14, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I-35W Bridge

Thanks for your encouragement. I've been an avid reader of Wikipedia for years even though I just signed up for an account and I have a lot of respect for the work people have contributed. Hence, my hesitation to jump in and edit willy-nilly. The i35w bridge article is a good one that I have been following since August and I know a lot of people put a lot of thought and work into it. I guess I'm following the old advice, "Better to keep your mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than open it and remove all doubt."

In any case, if I make any changes they will be minor. For instance I would substitute "local officials requested Navy divers," instead of the attribution to Sheriff Stanek. I would also re-word the "9-11 technologies" paragraph to say funding provided by the Dept. of Homeland Security enabled municipal, county and state public safety departments to upgrade their radio systems which many credit with the swift and coordinated response to the collapse. I'd leave in the link to the Bruce Schneier article.

It's a Wiki article that is flagged as a "good one" and it's cited by many around the web where the I-35W bridge is discussed; the last thing I want to do is wreck it. There's a faint underlying tone, however, that suggests someone was determined to bring in some connection - any connection - to 9-11. I think that bothered me more than anything else. Something I can't quite put my finger on just yet. JeffTracy (talk) 00:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Season's Greetings from my hometown, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Boy times have changed since, I think it was about 1994. So much overhead to lug around, but nothing the woman I met in the San Diego DMV couldn't write around in about 2 seconds with something called "ST Include" for Windows. Only kidding, I forgot the program's name but writing around an operating system would be quite easy for someone who completed studies in India recently. Best wishes for the new year from someone who recognizes your name from Wikipedia. And you helped me so much in about one email. -Susanlesch (talk) 19:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Susan-- best wishes to you also for the new year. Kablammo (talk) 13:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Your username is awesome

I just like the thought of seeing a stinging rebuke somewhere signed 'Kablammo'. You should add an exclamation point to it too! Jtrainor (talk) 13:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your note! But I try not to engage in rebukes, much less stinging ones-- I try to let the facts speak for themselves. Still, it can be tempting . . . Regards, Kablammo (talk) 13:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kablammo/Archive_3&oldid=1088247456"