User talk:KGRAMR

Potential request for help and advice

Hi, I don't want to much bother (or write to much) on friendly notice. If you can, could you investigate the edits made by unregistered user with accounts 141.136.245.131 and 89.164.199.18 reverted by user FMSky. The edits made by former are I think well made, constructive, analitical and fair but with some mistakes of course; FMSky's edits are possibly result of vandalism and unfairness (and violation of some rules potentially), while the former's aim is to make a correct grammar mistakes (comas, colons, duplicate words (and numbers)) etc. and to make texts comprehensible, smooth and, in some cases, some shortening and so on. The topic is about video game titles (sections Gameplay, Development and Reception, the latter probably not in all articles). I know you are not administrator but if you can check it out; if it is vandalism, then possible revert to all or partial. I went to another user to talk but was mistake (little edits about 40), while you have a lot. Please also refrain from bad unregistered users bias - not all unregistered users are bad (they can be fair and honest) but some are bad ones; it is also for registered (some good, some bad). In addition, I also respect some Wiki rules, even though some of them I am not agreedable with them too much, just calm opinion. You can delete message freely, but before this please read it if you can. If there is another one who can help and understand, well thank you. Peace.

141.138.48.219 (talk), 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Protector (Atari Jaguar video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Protector (Atari Jaguar video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shooterwalker -- Shooterwalker (talk) 19:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Metamor Jupiter

Hello. Thank you for improving Spriggan Powered.

Please watch Metamor Jupiter. I had already created it, but someone who don't understand the notability rules for games deleted it, even though I've added plenty of references, including a full review by a third-party Japanese magazine and mentions by publications from other countries.

I fear that the same person will attempt to delete it again, since he/she don't follow the rules and ignore the hundreds or thousands of already existing articles about games that have no good references at all. -- Beqwk (talk) 01:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

List of shoot 'em up games

Hello again. Please take a look at Draft:List of shoot 'em up games and make sure it gets published. I spent days on it, and there are already lists about many other video game genres. If appropriate, split it into different pages. Thank you. -- Beqwk (talk) 01:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Guardian Force

Hello. More editors who don't follow the rules and are on Wikipedia just to destroy our hard work now want to delete Guardian Force (video game), even though I've already provided:

• A full old magazine review about it
• A review from Hardcore Gaming 101, maybe the most respected English-language retro gaming site
• A review of the compilation by Nintendo Life, a current major gaming site

Please watch this article and make sure they won't delete it. I won't waste my time creating any other articles due to these editors. I suspect they don't even click on the references I spent days searching for on Archive.org and other sites.

If you have the time, please watch all the other articles I've created too. Thank you. -- Beqwk (talk) 01:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Protector (Atari Jaguar video game)

The article Protector (Atari Jaguar video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Protector (Atari Jaguar video game) for comments about the article, and Talk:Protector (Atari Jaguar video game)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shooterwalker -- Shooterwalker (talk) 02:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Iron Soldier

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Iron Soldier you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 20:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Iron Soldier

The article Iron Soldier you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Iron Soldier for comments about the article, and Talk:Iron Soldier/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 10:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hyper Duel

The article Hyper Duel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hyper Duel and Talk:Hyper Duel/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 22:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hyper Duel

The article Hyper Duel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hyper Duel for comments about the article, and Talk:Hyper Duel/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 01:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

In the mood for a cheeseburger at the moment. I'm aware that your editing activity has been as persistent as always, but I haven't bumped into your name in a while. Glad to have you around! Panini! • 🥪 17:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

@Panini!:No problemo! I do what i can. Roberth Martinez (talk) 18:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Iron Soldier 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Iron Soldier 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 11:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Iron Soldier 2

The article Iron Soldier 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Iron Soldier 2 for comments about the article, and Talk:Iron Soldier 2/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 21:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)