User talk:JzG/Archive 217
This is an archive of past discussions with User:JzG. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 210 | ← | Archive 215 | Archive 216 | Archive 217 | Archive 218 |
Requesting a reduction in page protection
On 30 November 2019, you salted the page Christine Weston Chandler. I cannot find the discussion behind this, but I imagine it was due to WP:BLP concerns, since at the time, there were little-to-no secondary sources aboout Chris and most information about her was known through invasion of her privacy. But nowadays, Chris has been referenced in mainstream media, had major national news networks cover her arrest, had a book from a major publisher written about her, had people make an entire wiki and multi-hour documentaries about her, and become arguably the most documented person in history. Here are some high-quality articles attesting to her notability:
- KVIA, People articles on the recent incest charges (amongst others)
- Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment, by Kevin Veale (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2020)
- Event Horizon: Sexuality, Politics, Online Culture, and the Limits of Capitalism, Bonni Rambatan and Jacob Johanssen, (Zero Books, 2021)
- Vaughn, Victor. "Deposition, Conjecture, and the Word of Nod." (2015).
In previous talk pages, the concern was raised that this page could be used for harrassment. However, it could simply be protected to WP:ECP, or a non-attacking page created and then permanently locked. The intention of this is not to harrass Chris, but simply to fill an odd gap in Wikipedia's coverage of people, since Chris is currently by far the most notable person without a Wikipedia page. Additionally, Chris herself has stated several times that she wants to have a Wikipedia page. So, in conclusion, I believe pages relating to Chris Chan should be un-salted.I💖平沢唯 (talk) 00:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I am no longer an admin, and you'll have an uphill struggle here because of her history with the utterly toxic KiwiFarms. The inclusion of the incest allegation makes it sound like the usual WP:COATRACK that we've seen from them before. Guy (help! - typo?) 15:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ILoveHirasawaYui: It is incredibly unlikely that anyone will be permitted to write anything about that topic at Wikipedia. People pushing the topic are likely to be blocked. The reason for that should be self-evident. Anyone having trouble understanding that might not be a good fit for Wikipedia. I am an admin. Johnuniq (talk) 05:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- The reason is not self-evident to me. Can you please explain it? I💖平沢唯 (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- No page at Wikipedia is available for trolling victims of harassment regardless of what they or anyone else thinks about it. Please find other topic to work on. Johnuniq (talk) 06:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- But Chris has attracted plenty of media attention outside of being a harassment victim. And besides, Wikipedia has a whole category called "Victims of cyberbullying". I think a hypothetical Wikipedia page on Chris would mention her as the author of Sonichu, her transition, and her arrest, trial and release for incest charges. It would only mention the harassment very briefly, as most media outlets did after her arrest. The only information on the page would be what the media reported about Chris. Once the page is made and finalised, it would be locked to prevent vandalism. I💖平沢唯 (talk) 23:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Do not underestimate the extent to which I am actively uninterested in KF's obsession with ChrisChan. You have your answer above. That's it. Guy (help! - typo?) 23:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- But Chris has attracted plenty of media attention outside of being a harassment victim. And besides, Wikipedia has a whole category called "Victims of cyberbullying". I think a hypothetical Wikipedia page on Chris would mention her as the author of Sonichu, her transition, and her arrest, trial and release for incest charges. It would only mention the harassment very briefly, as most media outlets did after her arrest. The only information on the page would be what the media reported about Chris. Once the page is made and finalised, it would be locked to prevent vandalism. I💖平沢唯 (talk) 23:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- No page at Wikipedia is available for trolling victims of harassment regardless of what they or anyone else thinks about it. Please find other topic to work on. Johnuniq (talk) 06:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- The reason is not self-evident to me. Can you please explain it? I💖平沢唯 (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Well, you're Twitter-famous
Congratulations on being mentioned. BD2412 T 16:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Pissing off Scott Adams is a proud achievement. Guy (help! - typo?) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
- Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.
- Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
- The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.
- This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
Some stuff you wrote got removed for unclear reasons. I did add a source for the bit that explains where part of the funding came from. Can you take a look to see if I missed anything? Thanks in advance, Polygnotus (talk) 00:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Notice of reliable sources noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is The Telegraph and trans issues. Thank you. I am informing you because you have commented on a prior RfC on a similar issue. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 02:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
Restore as draft
Can you restore Kuntilanak 2 that you deleted as A7 as a draft (I know typically this isn't done but this seems to be a notable Indonesian film)? I found some sources about production and a review at User:DareshMohan/sandbox#Kuntilanak_2. DareshMohan (talk) 06:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
Nomination for merger of Template:AbuseFilter
Template:AbuseFilter has been nominated for merging with Template:Edit filter. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 11:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).
- Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
- Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
- The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ
J. Hutton Pulitzer - patent troll?
The link in your original version[1] to patent troll is not sourced by the cited text. Someone changed it to remove the link and I reverted them. It seems I made a mistake. Any comment? Doug Weller talk 08:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Just read the stuff above, I also hope you are well. And if you are not, I hope I haven't upset you. Doug Weller talk 08:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- He is a patent troll, but he is also litigious, so most of the mentions in sources that called him that, explicitly, appear to have been scrubbed. Guy (help! - typo?) 19:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).
- Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
. - A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
- Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
- The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
- Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
Deletion review for Failure demand
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Failure demand. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ExplodingCabbage (talk) 15:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)