User talk:Justine Msechu

Fan art images in lead sections / infoboxes

Dear Justine Msechu, thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia.

However, the Middle-earth WikiProject does not use fan art or low-quality photographs in its lead sections or infoboxes to head up its articles. The articles are based on J. R. R. Tolkien's books and scholarly criticism of them, with additional information about films, games and so on related to the books. Artwork is required to be of suitable quality. I have therefore reverted some of your edits.

All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chiswick Chap thank you for the information can i get the information about how to choose the good quality picture?.

regards, --Justine Msechu (talk) 09:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boromir. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop adding fan art images to Middle-earth articles, these are not of suitable quality for the WikiProject. All your edits are reverted. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative accounts

Is this you? User:Aminwa 21? --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 13:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this also you? User:Lilianfeliz? --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aminwa 21. Thank you. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Justine Msechu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i use my account only in my laptop and phone i dont know why you guys atack me? if there is any reason make it clear if not unblock me Justine Msechu (talk) 18:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocked per the below discussion with the blocking admin. I strongly advise that you and your fellow WPWPARK editors slow way down with adding images and engage with other editors when reverted - you aren't sockpuppets, but that doesn't prevent you from just getting blocked for being disruptive. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, recommend unblock here (and on the other CU-blocked WPWP folks) - WPWP has plenty of issues, but I don't think this is socking. Per the AN/I discussion, I think this is multiple people meeting up, like an editathon, and the prize structure doesn't seem to encourage socking (block evasion, maybe, but not socking). GeneralNotability (talk) 23:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GeneralNotability, you have the same powers I do, and you have my blessing. BTW, Justine Msechu's response is both impolite and not exactly to the point: it's not about the laptop, it's about the room, the building, the network that this laptop is plugged into. What they might could explain is how, on July 24, they were on the exact same IP address as Janeth Mosha, Edward Jacobo, Collysoka, and Innocent Massawe. Justine and Innocent logged off at the same time that day. Plus, there's the warnings you saw above, on this talk page, and the edits they made that were reverted by Future Perfect. So besides the socking, there's competence, and NOTHERE. Again, please unblock if you see fit. Drmies (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, well, I don't quite - this is a CU block, which is why I asked. There's absolutely issues with their editing, but the balance of evidence convinces me that this is a CIR editathon-type thing, which at the very least doesn't need a CU block. Will unblock with a very strong warning. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, GeneralNotability--it's all good. I don't think there's a need for a warning, extra strong or not; they either get it or they don't. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap filler - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

AfroCine: 2021 Months of African Cinema Contest Winners

Greetings!

After successfully completing the 2021 Months of African Cinema Global Contest on 30 November 2021, we are happy to announce the winners in the contest!

Over 4,000 articles were created across 17 language Wikipedias, surpassing all expectations and placing the contest firmly as one of the most successful article-writing contests on Wikipedia. A big thank you to you and every single person who created articles during the period of the contest for making this happen!

All our winners have now been announced and you can check the complete list here. We'd still be contacting everyone who has won something separately to send over their prizes. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! –Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Justine Msechu!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,428,684 registered editors!

Hello, Justine Msechu. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Jeffrey (Wiki Ed), one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

Introduction to Wikipedia (and editing)

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, Jeffrey (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Jeffrey (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Justine Msechu. Thank you for your work on Aneth David. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is no demonstration that she is notable, and currently her publication record is weak. It is WP:TOOSOON unless you can revise the page including sufficient major awards or coverage.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aneth David moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aneth David. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and see talk page,no proof of notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,@Ldm1954, for reviewing the Aneth David article and for your guidance. I’ll work to gather additional reliable sources to better establish notability and improve the draft’s overall quality. I’ll consult the information on Help new page and will resubmit once I’ve made the necessary improvements. Thanks again for your assistance Justine Msechu (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]