User talk:Jujutacular/Archive 17
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jujutacular. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 |
Anatolian Tigers Motorcycle Club
Dont understand why Anatolian Tigers MC club pages is deleted since there are lots of mc club information in the wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cingularis (talk • contribs) 14:22, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Cingularis, I deleted the Anatolian Tigers Motorcycle Club article because it made no indication as to how it was notable. Other motorcycle clubs may have adequate coverage from reliable, third-party sources, and thus warrant an article on Wikipedia. Or, they may need to be deleted if they don't have that coverage in reliable sources. Hopefully this helps. Jujutacular (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Peñabot
Realmente crees que este articulo es relevante? y la imagen no le veo sentido. puedes ver si hay verdadero enciclopedismo de este articulo. pues lo dejo a tu disposición. o bueno, si no estas seguro, puede una consulta de borrado funcionar? Adiós y perdón por molestar mucho. --189.238.68.68 (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of curiousity - did you read the detailed research at the talkpage of the deleted version of the article before re-opening a new discussion? Do you wish someone to have to recreate that research or will you consider merging it with the new draft which contains pretty much identical claim to notability to the many deleted versions. @MelanieN:, @FreeRangeFrog: may be able to help out if you are unable due to not being active --ℕ ℱ 19:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- As I noted, G4 did not seem appropriate as it was not identical to previous versions. Furthermore, drafts are specifically exempted from G4 deletion. There's a reason it sat in the speedy deletion queue for over 24 hours. I did consult several other admins on IRC. There's no harm in allowing it to sit in the draft namespace to see if enough reliably sourced information can be included for an article, even if the subject is a hoax. I'm fine with deleting if that is the consensus from the MFD discussion, but it was languishing in the speedy queue. The analysis has already been copied to User talk:4letheia/Palam Kalyanasundaram-2. Jujutacular (talk) 21:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- thanks for your reply, but you seem to have made the decision without checking the analysis which was in fact at User_talk:4letheia/Palam_Kalyanasundaram and is currently still deleted. Please consider reinstating --ℕ ℱ 21:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've restored that talk page for your reference. Jujutacular (talk) 21:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've linked it from the discussion now, hopefully it will save people a bit of unnecessary reinventing the wheel. --ℕ ℱ 21:46, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've restored that talk page for your reference. Jujutacular (talk) 21:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Timothy Kast
Not too concerned with the deprod, but just thought I would give you a heads up on NHOCKEY. At the bottom of the section there is a link to what leagues fall under what criteria. The Swiss league falls under requiring 200 games, not just playing in the league. He is close enough that I am not surprised he was deproded, but he is not quite there yet. -DJSasso (talk) 03:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Noted! Thank you for the correction. Jujutacular (talk) 03:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Deletion of Akher Zapheer
@Jujutacular: Uhm, the reason for the deletion of this page was the lack of references which I have provided in the newer article... --Makeandtoss (talk) 10:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- The old version did also have references. It was substantially the same. I would recommend creating a draft in your userspace and submitting to Articles for Creation. Jujutacular (talk) 21:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Kindly email me the deleted article, so that I can modify on it.. --Makeandtoss (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- I see it has already been placed at Draft:Akher Zapheer. Jujutacular (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Kindly email me the deleted article, so that I can modify on it.. --Makeandtoss (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
JacquesPHI
Hi Jujutacular,
It's true that User:JacquesPHI edited an article about his company and one of the company's products. He did, however, make useful contributions to a number of other articles, for example here, and has the capability to edit responsibly. I understand that his name violates the username policy, but Wikipedia:Username_policy#Promotional_names allows some flexibility here. He's not a single-purpose account, and I think a block is a bit extreme in this case. Also, the boilerplate text of the block notice will probably be misunderstood, because it starts out basically accusing him of being a spam account. --Slashme (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Slashme, thank you for the correction, I have changed to the "soft block" message template and unblocked account creation. Hopefully this will have a better effect. Jujutacular (talk) 12:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Great, thanks! --Slashme (talk) 15:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Ebola Speedy Deletion.
Hello, I am trying to get an explanation for an action that occurred without my knowledge, and you are an involved party. (Note: I received the notification on my talk page, but did not know about it until now. That part I am ok with.) Specifically, this edit made a few days ago. "18:38, September 5, 2015 Jujutacular (talk | contribs) moved page Wikipedia:Ebola virus disease in Nigeria to User:BrianGroen/Ebola virus disease in Nigeria without leaving a redirect (not appropriate use of Wikipedia namespace) (revert)" Could you kindly explain what part of my redirect was inappropriate and deserved a speedy delete? --Super Goku V (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Super Goku V, I didn't speedy delete, but merely moved it from the Wikipedia namespace to the userspace. The Wikipedia namespace is for information or policies about Wikipedia, not for Wikipedia articles themselves. Feel free to move it to your userspace (e.g. User:Super Goku V/Ebola virus disease in Nigeria). Jujutacular (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, Jujutacular, but I think I put things together. Basically, I created a redirect last year. On the 5th of this month, User:BrianGroen edited out the redirect and created an article. User:Jamie Tubers intervened and restored it back to a redirect. User:BrianGroen decided to revert that, move it to the Wikipedia namespace, and blank the article. Then User:BrianGroen tagged that empty page for speedy deletion and place a notice on my page about my redirect being an inappropriate article/redirect. Then, you intervened and moved the redirect turned article into the userspace. So, sorry for the confusion. --Super Goku V (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- HI Super Goku V (talk) i am partly to blame for the confusion i wanted to move it to Ebola virus disease in Nigeria not knowing the article exist, but in the process i accidentally placed in the Wikimedia space instead of article space... I am partially sighted due to a disease and it was a honest mistake. I then blanked the page so it could be speedily deleted as per wiki rules. Sorry about that, but it is in the correct place now. Kind Regards Brian BrianGroen (talk) 08:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, Jujutacular, but I think I put things together. Basically, I created a redirect last year. On the 5th of this month, User:BrianGroen edited out the redirect and created an article. User:Jamie Tubers intervened and restored it back to a redirect. User:BrianGroen decided to revert that, move it to the Wikipedia namespace, and blank the article. Then User:BrianGroen tagged that empty page for speedy deletion and place a notice on my page about my redirect being an inappropriate article/redirect. Then, you intervened and moved the redirect turned article into the userspace. So, sorry for the confusion. --Super Goku V (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Bristol Farms
Where's the "credible assertion of importance or significance"? Sionk (talk) 22:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- I declined because it appears it may have significant coverage in reliable sources. I recommend taking to AFD if desired. Jujutacular (talk) 22:48, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
RFPP
Didn't mean to step on your toes. Looks like we were looking at the same report at the same time. --NeilN talk to me 22:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- No problem, it seems you didn't think protecting the page is necessary, which I already done when I saw your comment. I'm fine with unprotecting if you think it would be beneficial. Jujutacular (talk) 22:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Talk pages for Commons files are not eligible for speedy deletion. See WP:CSD#G8 (the policy is not as explicit as it used to be, unfortunately). Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the correction, I hadn't realized that. I have reverted the delete. Jujutacular (talk) 14:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Deletion of the Chaker Khazaal page
Hi there. I hope you are well. I would like to email you a bunch of articles/news written about Chaker Khazaal. Many of them are in languages other than English hence why they do not show in his news results when you look him up (to establish notability). Is there any chance we can contest the page deletion and get it back live with proper citations? GlobalWikiCitizen —Preceding undated comment added 20:54, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi GlobalWikiCitizen, I have userfied the article in your userspace (User:GlobalWikiCitizen/Chaker Khazaal). You can edit there and submit at deletion review if and when you think it is warranted. Jujutacular (talk) 22:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!
https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Deletion of the Jay-P page
hello Jujutacular. I noticed a page i created a while back was deleted. Can you please avail me a copy of it so that i can update it to a format acceptable by Wikipedia. I have gathered news articles and the likes Kindly Advise — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexanderGee (talk • contribs)
- It appears consensus here is that the subject is not notable for an article at this time, thank you. Jujutacular (talk) 22:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Alright Jujutacular. Is it okay for me to redo the article offline with mostly new verifiable references/citations and have you review it and if possible seek your guidance — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexanderGee (talk • contribs) 16:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: "Aerospace Engineering And Aviation News" page deleted
Hello,
You have deleted a page that I have created. It was about a website and an aerospace journal which credibly indicates the importance of the subject. There are already few stuff which has an engineering point of view in aviation and you have deleted one of them. Could you please kindly take back your action and create the page again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diyetisyenece (talk • contribs)
- It was requested to be deleted as it did not indicate significance. I agreed with the nominator and deleted the article. Generally, a topic should only have a Wikipedia article if it has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" -- see Wikipedia:Notability. I would suggest creating a draft article and submitting through Wikipedia:Articles for creation if you still think it meets Wikipedia notability guidelines. Jujutacular (talk) 00:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: "Francine Muyumba"
Hello jujutacular,
A few months back you deleted a page ("Francine Muyumba") that I created. I was very new to wikipedia and did not properly understand how Proposed Articles for Deletion functioned and after someone else made a major edit to the page I created, it was deleted using that method. Apparently the article was flagged as "Non notable person - being src president isn't enough. Fails GNG", however due to the edits made it may have been flagged unnecessarily. The person in question is a major African politician and the President of the youth branch of the African Union. Does this still qualify as non-notable or was there something in the content of the article that may have made that unclear? What can I do help reinstate the page? Bjornanderspeterson (talk) 05:03, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and happy new year
.jpg)
Restoring "Nathaniel David Becker"
Hi Jujutacular,
I recently attempted to edit a page, Nathaniel David Becker, which appears to have been deleted by you in September 2015. It is unclear to me why it was previously deleted. Could you please restore so I may make edits and/or resolve the issue that let to its deletion in the first place. Thank you and happy holidays!
Best,
Whatupfox
Restoring Lukasz Krupadziorow
Hi Jujutacular,
Can you restore Lukasz Krupadziorow article, he is now notable kickboxer as he fought for ISKA world title.
Master Sun Tzu (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Alban bunjaku
Hello there. I saw at Alban Bunjaku logs that last time this article was deleted by you. Can you please restore previous revisions before last time page was deleted. Thank you. Eni.Sukthi.Durres (talk) 18:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Romanovsky deletion
I am a bit puzzled. There were more "keeps" than "delete". I believe that "notability" is only one guideline, and has been subjectively applied here. Surely there are many pieces that don't meet those guidelines but which are important to have in WP. I am a historian and have read all Romanovsky articles that are cited and there is no doubt that they are notable contributions recognized by eminent scholars in an area which is just developing (because of the opening of the Soviet archives) and it was useful to me to learn about the person who did the research. I do wonder how many of the deleters knew very much about the subject as well. Surely knowing the "guidelines" is not really sufficient. But enough time lost, I will move on but not without disappointment with this WP process. Joel Mc (talk) 08:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Joel, thanks for working on this. As you note, there were more users in favor of "keep" than "deletes". However, decisions on Wikipedia are made through consensus rather than voting. As I note in my closure, my reading of the discussion is that those in favor of "keep" did not adequately show how the subject passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If you disagree with my reading of the discussion you are welcome to open a deletion review. Jujutacular (talk) 14:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deletion review for Daniel Romanovsky
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Daniel Romanovsky. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Thoughtmonkey (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Your relist here was plainly inappropriate. Consensus, and the applicable guideline, has changed since the 2010 AFD. Please undo your action and get this right, or else leave the decision for someone who will more accurately apply policy and guidelines here. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:08, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree. Any administrator is free to close it at any time. I'm concerned by the state of the discussion at the AFD. The arguments made absolutely no reference to the previous AFD, noting that the subject no longer meets the applicable notability guideline if that's the case. Two requests that the article be "salted", is clearly inappropriate if one evaluates the deletion and AFD history. There is no harm in allowing the AFD extra time to improve the arguments to help solidify consensus. Thank you for sharing. Jujutacular (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- No, you're dead wrong. The prior AFD was six-and=one-half years ago, and consensus, both as to the applicable guideline and the level of sourcing required for such BLPs, has clearly changed. It's not your place as an admin to pass judgment on the merits of a well-establioshed community consensus. It's abusive to do so. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 11:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)