User talk:Jph98

Hello Jph98, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Addison2008 (talk) 07:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

pastebin

Your hostname does not resolve, and cannot be found via the search engine tests, and qualifies to be removed as a dead external link. You are also not paying any attention to the vetted procedure for getting a link added to the list. --Slepp (talk) 00:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC) -- DNS resolves directly from the master NS, though REFUSED is a common response from outside those servers. Now, show notability and popularity, and request addition on the Pastebin discussion page. Someone else, without COI, will put it in or leave it there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slepp (talk • contribs) 00:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read this too: Wikipedia:External links, particularly Wikipedia:EL#ADV. If you still think I'm being unfair, feel free to file a complaint. --Slepp (talk) 01:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback on my page, read the above here. It ended up resolving, but _not_ from 3 of Canada's largest ISPs (Shaw, Allstream and Telus). You keep saying it's private, so I'm not sure what you're getting at with that. No matter what, you are not getting consensus for your link, and are not following the procedures to get a link added. Read the material above, as suggested, read the page comments, as suggested, and use the Pastebin talk page to discuss and request the link. I've already placed your request there. And I can't just "look closely" given that access to the site is rather limited with the DNS problems that presently exist when resolving via Shaw and Allstream. --18:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slepp (talk • contribs)

Anything to put in the Pastebin discussion yet? --Slepp (talk) 23:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Object-oriented design ontology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Object-oriented design ontology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented design ontology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MadScientistX11 (talk) 17:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eggel (Egg Bagel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eggel (Egg Bagel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eggel (Egg Bagel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 13:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]