User talk:JonathanLGardner

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mary Wilson.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mary Wilson.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Florence Ballard has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Res2216firestar 01:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from I Am… Sasha Fierce. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DiverseMentality 23:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Michelle Williams - We Break The Dawn Single Photo.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Michelle Williams - We Break The Dawn Single Photo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Michelle Williams - We Break The Dawn Single Photo.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Michelle Williams - We Break The Dawn Single Photo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Michelle Williams.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Michelle Williams.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:LeToya Luckett.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:LeToya Luckett.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Michelle Williams.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Michelle Williams.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The Supremes - Sing HDH.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:The Supremes - Sing HDH.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Supremes - Sing HDH.png

Thank you for uploading File:The Supremes - Sing HDH.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Michelle Williams.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Michelle Williams.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:LeToya Luckett.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:LeToya Luckett.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

File:The Supremes - Sing HDH.png

Please read through a template before you remove it. The template states "Please remove this template if you have successfully addressed the concern. Note If you think the image should not be deleted, please discuss the matter with the editor who placed this template on the image. You can also place comments on the image talk page." The concern was not addressed because you provide no information. In the future, either use the image or editor's talk page if you have a concern with an image instead of reverting without using an edit summary. Aspects (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries and minor edits

Looking at your recent contributions you seem to be making two mistakes with your edits. The first mistake is that you fail to provide edit summaries so other editors know why you made the edits. Please read through Help:Edit summary. The second mistake is that you are marking edits as "minor" when they are not. Please read through Help:Minor edit: "A minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." Fixing these two mistakes should improve your editing here at Wikipedia. Aspects (talk) 18:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:LeToya - LeToya.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:LeToya - LeToya.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 03:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:LeToya - LeToya.png

A tag has been placed on File:LeToya - LeToya.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:LeToya - LeToya.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Aspects (talk) 05:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:LeToya - LeToya.png

A tag has been placed on File:LeToya - LeToya.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:LeToya - LeToya.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Aspects (talk) 08:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Out_of_Eden_-_Hymns.png

I have tagged File:Out_of_Eden_-_Hymns.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 01:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:LeToya - LeToya.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LeToya - LeToya.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:LeToya - LeToya.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:LeToya - LeToya.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:LeToya - LeToya.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Aspects (talk) 20:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Out of Eden - 2004 (Pic 1) -s-.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Out of Eden - 2004 (Pic 1) -s-.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Out of Eden - 2004 (Pic 2)ue -s-.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Out of Eden - 2004 (Pic 2)ue -s-.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Please stop reverting edits without providing an edit summary

Will you please stop reverting edits without providing an edit summary? When you click the "Undo" button it states at the top "If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary rather than using only the default message." By not placing an edit summary, you say you are undoing vandalism. If the edit was not vandalism, you are then being uncivil to the other editor.

When another editor uses an edit summary to show you a page explaining policy, please read through that page instead of just reverting. You should read through the whole of Wikipedia:Images because you seem to spend a lot of time downloading images to Wikipedia, adding images to articles and changing current images.

Also please read through Wikipedia:Non-free content as to where non-free images, such as album covers, can be used. Specifically, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images for acceptable uses: "Cover art from various items, for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary)." and Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images_2 for unacceptable uses: "An album cover as part of a discography, as per the above."

Please read Wikipedia:Album#Cover: "The width of the image should ideally be no less than 200px (the default display size of the infobox), but it should be no more than 300px on at least one side (to satisfy fair use.)"

So in conclusion, please stop adding album and/or single covers to band/group/artist infoboxes because there is no critical commentary and if you are going to upload/change images please make sure at the most they are 300px by 300px. Aspects (talk) 20:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Out of Eden - 2004 (Pic 1) -s-.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Out of Eden - 2004 (Pic 1) -s-.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:41, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Supremes (Promo Pic 1).png)

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes (Promo Pic 1).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

The recent edit you made to The Boy Does Nothing has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 16:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:1965 - Nothing But Heartaches -3-.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:1965 - Nothing But Heartaches -3-.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Beyonce - Halo (Alternate Cover).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Beyonce - Halo (Alternate Cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Booty Luv - Some Kinda Rush.png

Thanks for uploading File:Booty Luv - Some Kinda Rush.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Out of Eden - No Turning Back.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Out of Eden - No Turning Back.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:LeToya - Lady Love (Album Sampler cover).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:LeToya - Lady Love (Album Sampler cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

File:1967 - The Supremes Sing Holland-Dozier-Holland -Enhanced by Jonathan Gardner-.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1967 - The Supremes Sing Holland-Dozier-Holland -Enhanced by Jonathan Gardner-.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

File:LeToya - She Ain't Got... (Explicit Version cover).png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LeToya - She Ain't Got... (Explicit Version cover).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (3)cropped.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (3)cropped.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (2)cropped.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (2)cropped.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Do not undo me without comment, I am not a vandal. Only free images would be suitable for that use, as the image is clearly replaceable. Please see our non-free content criteria. J Milburn (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (3).png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (3).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (2).png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (2).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:LeToya - Not Anymore (Screenshot).png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:LeToya - Not Anymore (Screenshot).png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

File:1973 - Bad Weather (Alternate Cover).png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1973 - Bad Weather (Alternate Cover).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

File:1970 - Everybody's Got The Right To Love (Alternate Cover).png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1970 - Everybody's Got The Right To Love (Alternate Cover).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Addition of non-free images—Final warning

This is your final warning. The next time you add a non-free image of a living person when free alternatives exist or can be created, you will be blocked from editing. — Σxplicit 21:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments like this are completely inappropriate. Also consider this your final warning for incivility. J Milburn (talk) 21:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries are no different, this is also not appropriate. If this activity continues after you have been warned you will be blocked from editing. Fuzbaby (talk) 04:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:LeToya - She Ain't Got... - Screenshot.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LeToya - She Ain't Got... - Screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 21:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

File:1969 - Someday We'll Be Together (Alternate Cover).png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1969 - Someday We'll Be Together (Alternate Cover).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Booty Luv - Boogie 2Nite (iTunes cover).png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Booty Luv - Boogie 2Nite (iTunes cover).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:She Ain't Got... - Screenshot (4).png

Thank you for uploading File:She Ain't Got... - Screenshot (4).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 21:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:She Ain't Got... - Screenshot (2).png

Thank you for uploading File:She Ain't Got... - Screenshot (2).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 21:21, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Explicit. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Explicit is right. The image completely fails WP:NFCC#8 as well as WP:NFCC#3b. Wikipedia is very strict regarding Non-free content rules. No ranting will get you out of this. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:01, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Maintain civility and behaviour in Wikipedia. If I report the way you are posting on talk pages you are surely to get blocked. Just STOP!!! You have to read WP:NFCC clearly and understand WP:NFCC#8 to know why your image is failing inclusion in Wikipedia. We donot accept any random non-free image here. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Neither does your opinion. Hence the image will be deleted as stated by Explicit who was right in nominating it. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (3).png

Thank you for uploading File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (3).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 16:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:She Ain't Got... - Screenshot (2).png

Thank you for uploading File:She Ain't Got... - Screenshot (2).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 17:03, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (2).png

Thank you for uploading File:We Break The Dawn - Screenshot (2).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 17:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Not Anymore - Screenshot (1968).png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Not Anymore - Screenshot (1968).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Σxplicit 17:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JonathanLGardner for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Σxplicit 18:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued copyright and image use policy violations after numerous notifications about it. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Not Anymore - Screenshot (1961).png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Not Anymore - Screenshot (1961).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 07:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Not Anymore - Screenshot (1964).png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Not Anymore - Screenshot (1964).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 07:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:1965 - Back In My Arms Again+Whisper You Love Me Boy2.png

Thank you for uploading File:1965 - Back In My Arms Again+Whisper You Love Me Boy2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 19:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

The Supremes

Hi Jonathan, images we were using in Supremes articles have been deleted per fair use rationale. Is their a way you can get some images of The Supremes to WikiCommons that we can use in these articles. User:Hammersoft even took out the one we used for The Supremes discography, which was the exact same one we used for The Supremes main article. Also, a portal for The Supremes has been created, and we were using the same discography image in that also when the same user took that out, too (as well as other images). I know you're an expert in this type of work, and I'm asking you for your help in thia matter, please.. Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 22:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC) P.S. --

Thanks for messaging me...I really wish I was an expert on these things but I am not...I just checked The Supremes page and the pictures all seem to be back now =D JonathanLGardner (talk) 19:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Jonathan, these three articles are ready for album covers - 20 Golden Greats, At Their Best, and Love Supreme - if might you be able to take care of this sometime, please! Thanks. Best, --Discographer (talk) 08:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Heya! I will do the 20 Golden Greats now, as I have the cover for that - my stepdad used to have the actual LP (to my annoyance it was the only Supremes album he had left in his record collection - which my mum gave away for free to some man on the street because she thought they were taking too much space up in the house!!!)...oh mothers...LOL JonathanLGardner (talk) 18:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I have done all three now =) Have a wonderfully s u p r e m e day JonathanLGardner (talk) 19:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Jonathan, thank you so much! Best, --Discographer (talk) 20:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Please note our policies of no original research and neutral point of view

Please do not add unsourced analysis to articles as you did with this edit. Opinions and analysis need to be sourced to knowledable third parties and not just the opinion of a Wikipedia editor. See particularly WP:ASF. MM207.69.137.15 (talk) 16:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

What do you want me to do? Add a link to audio of her singing which shows her range? Would that be suitable? JonathanLGardner (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

I want you to do the same thing we do for all content in Wikipedia articles - find reliable sources that verify content and claims made in the article so that it is not your opinion. MM 207.69.139.146 (talk) 03:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

I did that straight after my original reply actually...and no it wasn't simply a "point of view"...have a nice day... JonathanLGardner (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MJB - Strong with Each Tear (international version).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MJB - Strong with Each Tear (international version).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Evenangels.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evenangels.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Commander - Single Cover

per WP:NFCC covers should be of a small size and of LOW-Mid Quality and Resolution to serve their non-free status. The new version of the single cover you uploaded is too high quality and so i've reverted back.Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

:( ok then, thanks. I like your user page :D JonathanLGardner (talk) 18:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BrokenHeelsAlternate.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BrokenHeelsAlternate.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JLS - The Club Is Alive (Cover 2).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JLS - The Club Is Alive (Cover 2).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JLS - The Club Is Alive (Cover 1).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JLS - The Club Is Alive (Cover 1).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Return The Favour (UK cover).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Return The Favour (UK cover).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Return the Favor cover

Please don't change the cover back. The one you uploaded was EXTREMELY too big and too much of high quality, and non-free files have to be 300 x 300. And just to let you know, if someone re-uploads and image cover, it is usually because the original is too big. Thanks. Candyo32 15:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes I know all that, have you not seen my edit history? Anyway, if you were so concerned, why didn't you simply save the reduced version as a .png file and upload a new version of the file I originally posted rather than upload a whole new image? I'm sure you realise that's what the function is there for... JonathanLGardner (talk) 01:29, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

It was much easier to find a smaller version on Amazon than to reduce the current image. Also PNG is a high quality format, and jpg is lower, which is recommended. Candyo32 19:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Return The Favour (UK cover).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Return The Favour (UK cover).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1967 - In and Out of Love -2-.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1967 - In and Out of Love -2-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

copyright policy

Hi, Jon, do you understand copyright policy? You have a lot of deleted pics on your talkpage. For example [1] where did you get this picture you are claiming that you own it and that you are giving it freely to the world, do you own this picture? Did you take it yourself and if so do you have the original digital image? I would like to help you with this, perhaps you understand copyright, let me know please Jon. If you don't understand copyright then please don't upload any more pictures to Wikipedia and we can go through what you have uploaded, let me know Jon. Off2riorob (talk) 17:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

YES! I did take the [2] picture. I have Corel Paint Shop Pro X2 and edited the pic slightly (cropping it and adding contrast as well as sharpening it) to improve quality. I know about copyright, hence why I took MY OWN picture and edited myself. The work is completely my own. I have many other pictures from that night that I have taken, edited and posted here JonathanLGardner (talk) 22:26, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

You also seem to be uploading higher quality images of album covers when that is also against fair use, - . It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of such covers * solely to illustrate the audio recording in question, * on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law - it doesn't say low resolution for nothing. Please comment, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 18:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Rose Colored Glasses

Hi there, Thank you for adding the music video link to the infobox. However I had deliberately ommitted it because in GA reviews for Rowland's previous single "Commander", the use of the external music video link in the infobox was discouraged. Hence I've removed it again, since I intended to take this article to GA as well. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:52, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thanks...I'm just curious to know why people discourage the use of an external music video for GA article... JonathanLGardner (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure but I think it stems from the issue that sometimes it makes the infobox too long/to detailed. I was told "they can be better incorporated into the external links section". -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:13, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1968 - Love Child (Alternate Cover).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1968 - Love Child (Alternate Cover).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Happy New Year's

Hi Jonathan, my dear friend, have a Happy New Year's and let us remain as brothers! Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 23:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

I hope you have an incredible new year too! Thanks :) - JonathanLGardner (talk) 04:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Jonathan, and thanks for joining the WikiProject! As always, Best, --Discographer (talk) 07:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Unexpected assessment

You are very welcome, don't hesitate to ask if you want another assessments. By the way Florence Ballard is not an album article so we can't rate it. Zidane tribal (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Omg, LMAO, I totally didn't think about that, lolol, sorry, my bad haha. Thanks again JonathanLGardner (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Michelle Williams - We Break The Dawn (EP cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Michelle Williams - We Break The Dawn (EP cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:56, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

No worries, I actually removed the image myself, as I didn't feel that it was needed on the page JonathanLGardner (talk) 06:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:HallelujahAlexandraBurke.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HallelujahAlexandraBurke.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Images

Your constant uploads of high quality images are actually becoming a nuisance. U.S. and international copyright law is quite clear about the status of album and single covers. Per the copyright laws, album/single artwork is a non-free commericial work. Under the wikimedia agreements, wikipedia can upload low quality versions of artwork to demonstrate the covers of singles and albums. However that quality must not be equal to the actual image quality as this opens scope for others to copy and distribute the image and thus benefit commercially. The existing image for Overcome, for example was perfectly adequate because it showed all the features of the coverart without distorting any of the elements. You have consistently tried to upload higher quality images saying that existing ones are of 'terrible quality' when that simply isn't the case. When it comes to the law we should always side with caution. It may be a joke to you but wikipedia is liable for all images uploaded. A small amount of discoloration is an acceptable compromise for a coverart which definitely won't breach copyright law. Other users have reverted you in the past and now I'm officially asking you to stop this silly behaviour. If you think I'm wrong then by all means bring it up at WP:NFCC and seek advice but right now myself and others are convinced that covers you upload are breaching WP:NFCC so I politely ask you to stop. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 16:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Excuse me, but, I am all for uploading MODERATE quality images, but the image you reverted back to was clearly VERY LQ. Not even LQ, but VERY. Not only is the colour distorted but there is a very noticeable amount of noise. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Loud_-_Rihanna.jpg - that is MODERATE quality and I uploaded that. So please do no try to say that I "constantly" upload high quality images. I will admit that I used to, but I more recently, have been ensuring all copyrighted images I upload are of a moderate quality and for album/single covers 300x300 or less. I no longer see the point in arguing over the Overcome cover because it really isn't as serious to me as to waste any more time on it. However, I will not be made out to be some sort of pestuous vandal who is "constantly" breaching rules and guidelines. Thanks. JonathanLGardner (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

The rules apply not only to how the image appears on the upload page but how it appears in the infobox. It is the latter which is the primary concern. If the image appears fine in the infobox then there isn't an issue. Small amounts of pixilisation/colorisation are expected because that is the nature of non-free LOW quality media items. moderate quality is not acceptable, the rules are clear images should be of low quality so they cannot be redistributed and aid in the breach of copyright violations. Its not going to kill someone if the image is lower quality than you personally like but it goes a long way to preventing non-free media violations. You need to get off your high horse on this issue. I used the words 'constantly' because I've personally brushed into you several times on this matter and other users have also pulled you up on it but you don't seem to be prepared to listen. Whilst it may not seem like a big deal to yourself, wikipedia spends a LOT of money on legal teams to formulate the policies at a central level which govern the use of non-free media. It would be helpful if people like yourself remembered that the only reason we are allowed to upload covers in the first place is because US law stipulates Low Quality as a non-copyright infringement. Thus being able to upload non-free items is a privilege on wikipedia, NOT an automatic right. As I am not the only on mentioning this to you (others have reverted you too). WP:NFCC clearly and explicitly says "Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used". End of story. Have a good day. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you read my response carefully. I clearly admitted that I have not always uploaded the "low"est quality images. I am on no 'high horse'. I clearly admitted that I have made mistakes in the past. I don't feel it is necessary for you to be offensive to get your point across. In my response, I detailed that I felt I was made out to be some sort of vandal, when that is not the case. I truly believe my mistakes are far out-weighed by the positives that I have created in my contributions for wikipedia. I invite you to go and look at them yourself. I would much appreciate feedback - as I've seen your profile - and you're clearly an absolute pro - and no I'm not being sarcastic. JonathanLGardner (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

The Supremes 'A Go-Go

Hi Jonathan, how's it going? I seen this moved and do find a lot of sources like Discogs that show this as 'A Go-Go, though I found that Motown's albums catalogue show it listed as The Supremes 'A Go-Go. I agree with you in what the album cover shows, but maybe we should move it back for consistency with Motown's own (title) listing. Best, --Discographer (talk) 01:17, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

P.S. Might you be able to find a pic for The Andantes sometime, please? Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 01:17, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh ok, my bad. No problem, sorry :) thanks for being so polite - some people on here can get so moody when things aren't done their way LOL JonathanLGardner (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

About The Andantes...I don't own any free images of them and because they are all alive, I'm not sure some people will approve of using a non-free image. HOWEVER, they aren't in action as The Andantes anymore so I guess it would be ok. I'll add one soon :) JonathanLGardner (talk)

Okay, good. Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 22:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Mary - Shackles (Praise You) 2 (LQ).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mary Mary - Shackles (Praise You) 2 (LQ).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Motivation

Since when has MTV not been a reliable source? Please can you double check things before you go removing verified information from an article. Thanks. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 06:52, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

My bad, I mistook the ref name for actually being the reference. I'm just trying to ensure Kelly's pages are as verifiable and reliable as they should be. #TeamDC. If you get the time, check out my cover of the song ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeU70eY6A7U JonathanLGardner (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beyoncé - B'Day (Deluxe Edition)(Small).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beyoncé - B'Day (Deluxe Edition)(Small).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 23:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1967 - In and Out of Love -2-.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1967 - In and Out of Love -2-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 16:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1966 - My World Is Empty Without You -2-.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1966 - My World Is Empty Without You -2-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:39, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1966 - My World Is Empty Without You -2-.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1966 - My World Is Empty Without You -2-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

1+1 (song)

Rather than leaving comments on the article's talk page, take part in the deletion discussion. Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Have posted any images of Beyonce performing "Run the World" at the Billboard music awards here? We badly need one? If possible, try your best. Jivesh • Talk2Me 06:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have any - I wasn't at the Awards lol, so I can't take an image that isn't mine and post it there. I don't want to get in any trouble with copyright either here on Wiki or on Flickr. Sorry :\ If I find any images that have the licensing on Flickr that allows it to be on wiki I will most definately post it :) JonathanLGardner (talk) 12:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you Jonathan (Nice name). Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: Here I Am

I didn't remove it, someone else did because US Weekly is a tabloid. Reviews should come from noted industry critics. It is highly likely in the coming days that proper reviews will surface. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 21:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I was the one that removed the review. The reason is as Lil-unique explained, as well as in the article's history page, which shows the who, what, and when of edits made to the article and edit summaries, in which I explained the removal. Consider notable music publications such as those listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Review sites, or publications/sites used by Metacritic, which is more extensive (list) These are largely accepted as review sources and sources in general for WP:Albums articles. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok thanks, I know all that. BUT, at the time there was only the two reviews. I have no problem with it being replaced with a host of professional reviews if there was more than enough...but there isn't. Nevermind. JonathanLGardner (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Adam Lambert - For Your Entertainment - 2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adam Lambert - For Your Entertainment - 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kelly Rowland - Lay It on Me.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly Rowland - Lay It on Me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year!!!

Hi Jonathan, have a Happy New Year!!! Best, --Discographer (talk) 23:52, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Ultra_Nate_&_Michelle_Williams_-_Waiting_On_You_(LQ).jpg

I have tagged File:Ultra_Nate_&_Michelle_Williams_-_Waiting_On_You_(LQ).jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 12:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Waiting on You, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tweeted (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Kelly Rowland Here I Am

Hi there,

Can I use the cover art for Here I Am already used in the English wiki for the Hungarian article?--Szaboci (talk) 12:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Absolutely, go ahead :) JonathanLGardner (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trey Songz - Anticipation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trey Songz - Anticipation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. When you recently edited LeToya Luckett discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blood Money (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ashanti - The Woman You Love (2011)(LQ).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ashanti - The Woman You Love (2011)(LQ).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ginuwine - Playlist - The Very Best of Ginuwine.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ginuwine - Playlist - The Very Best of Ginuwine.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lately (Tyrese song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Underdogs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Diamonds (Rihanna song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. --(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 19:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

US R&B Songs

For clarity, there is a page at WP:USCHARTS which explains how to use Billboard Charts. Per that article, Hot R&B Songs and Hot Rap Songs are 25-song charts which are distillations (a.k.a component charts) of the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 19:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mica Paris discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One (U2 song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stylist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mica Paris - Whisper a Prayer.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mica Paris - Whisper a Prayer.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Temptations.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Temptations.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fire (Matt Cardle album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gfk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Love and War (Tamar Braxton song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

	Happy Holidays!
	Hi, Jonathan! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 19:17, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Temptations.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Temptations.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Best Days (Tamela Mann album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited If We Had Your Eyes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited If We Had Your Eyes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited If We Had Your Eyes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mica Paris - One.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mica Paris - One.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

	Happy Holidays!
	Hi, JonathanLGardner! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 00:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1965 - Nothing But Heartaches -2-.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1965 - Nothing But Heartaches -2-.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mica Paris discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Michelle Williams - Fire (Single Cover).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Michelle Williams - Fire (Single Cover).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Journey to Freedom (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OCC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michelle Williams (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OCC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Say Yes (Michelle Williams song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• One Music|E1 Music]]|publisher=[[PRNewswire]]|date=August 22, 2014|accessdate=October 3, 2014]]}}</ref> On the [[Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles]] chart which acts as a 25-song extension of the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:45, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michelle Williams discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rather Be. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

February 2015

Hello, I'm Amortias. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Journey to Freedom (album) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 21:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1972 - Automatically Sunshine.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1972 - Automatically Sunshine.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:03, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michelle Williams (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TV One. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Journey to Freedom (album) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flo ABC Records Promo from 1968.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flo ABC Records Promo from 1968.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mica Paris discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Happiness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JonathanLGardner. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Michelleuk.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Michelleuk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JonathanLGardner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Eternal discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to BPI and GLF

I Wanna Be the Only One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IRMA

Save Our Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IRMA

Stay (Eternal song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IRMA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eternal discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Before the Rain and So Good (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanya Blount, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Supremes (Promo Pic 1).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes (Promo Pic 1).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanya Blount, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Healing Tide, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Joplin and I'm Gonna Make You Mine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Mariah Carey - Caution - World Tour (Small)~.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mariah Carey - Caution - World Tour (Small)~.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mariah Carey - Caution - World Tour (Small)~.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Mariah Carey - Caution - World Tour (Small).png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1969 - The Composer (Promotional Poster).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1969 - The Composer (Promotional Poster).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JonathanLGardner. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scherrie Payne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eternal---The-Best.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eternal---The-Best.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurt Carr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michelle Williams discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Clark Sisters - You Brought The Sunshine.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Clark Sisters - You Brought The Sunshine.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Discography page

Please see User talk:Tripplepoints#Edit warring at The Supremes discography where I mentioned your name. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kierra Sheard, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BMI and This Christmas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

You did not explain why you reverted me. I explained that there were problems with accessibility. Please don't do that again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:26, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining your next edits. You do understand what accessibility is, and why it's important, don't you? if you'd like to discuss why other articles are formatted incorrectly, feel free to. If you want to discuss the layout on the article's talk page or on the talk page of a project, feel free to. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Another mistake?

reverted to 'number' as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers It says nothing about using "number", but MOS:NUMERO does. No., one of the two approved formats, was in use before you removed them. I correctly restored them. I have confirmed that the rowspans and {{na}} do meet accessibility guidelines and so I won't revert your unexplained and provocative edits again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

I wrote that text with "number" originally. You are incorrect. You are the one editing my original, clearly referenced texts to be provocative. You clearly have nothing better to do than mess up well-referenced work. I had to correct numerous edits which resulted in inaccurate info on the discography tables. You copied and pasted album titles on songs from different albums, despite numerous references clarifying this. Your lack of attention-to-detail is frustrating in the least. Please take the time to read existing references and Wikipedia templates as provided in my edits before further vandalisation, which I will not hesistate to report should you make accurate information false again. JonathanLGardner (talk) 11:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michelle Williams (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Mirror.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Remember Me (Daley song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Omar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaguar Wright, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vinyl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaguar Wright, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mica Paris discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages E17 and Another Level.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Supremes discography

added links pointing to Mary Wilson, My Favorite Things, CBS Records, Make Someone Happy and Second Hand Rose

Partners (Scherrie & Susaye album)

added a link pointing to Gary Grant

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1972 - Automatically Sunshine.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1972 - Automatically Sunshine.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1976 - I'm Gonna Let My Heart Do The Walking.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1976 - I'm Gonna Let My Heart Do The Walking.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Supremes - Touch (Germany).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes - Touch (Germany).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1971 - Nathan Jones.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1971 - Nathan Jones.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Supreme Florence "Flo" Ballard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ain't That Good News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Florence Ballard - Love Ain't Love - Single Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Florence Ballard - Love Ain't Love - Single Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Supreme Florence "Flo" Ballard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambassador Theatre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whisper a Prayer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BPI and So Good.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

The Supremes discography.

Hi JonathanLGardner ,

I erase you post, because you posted in my user page not in my talk page. I kept the charts they performed better and the more well known charts in the table, but you can change again and include the 10 charts you consider the best. I only did that because almost all Supremes singles has articles and the info you put there can be included in them.--88marcus (talk) 23:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I understand, no problem. I've added the chart peaks for each territory to the individual song pages so they are not lost. I propose for The Supremes' 60s singles removing the Record World and Cashbox charts, as their Billboard Hot 100 history has the most US entries after its R&B chart. Then for international charts; SWI (2 entries), NOR (3 entries), BEL FL (5 entries), GER (5 entries), IRE (7 entries - closely aligned to the UK also). I could either take out the R&B chart for the 60s singles and keep one of the international charts, but torn between GER and IRE. For the 70s singles, I'm thinking of removing; BEL FL (1 entry), NZ (1 entry), SGP (1 entry), BGK (2 entries), IRE (2 entries). This would leave the Cashbox and RW charts for the 70s singles, but they could be swapped out for 2 of the intnernational charts. What are your thoughts? JonathanLGardner (talk) 00:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Seems pretty good. When you talk to someone on your talk page, don't forget to put the {-{-ping-|-username-}-} (without trace) so that the person receives the notification that you are talking to them.--88marcus (talk) 14:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Thank You Darling

added a link pointing to CBS Records

The Rhythm of Life

added a link pointing to Frank Wilson

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Lead section in The Supremes discography

Hello JonathanLGardner,

You have done an excellent job on the article by the group The Supremes but I would like to show you this article with the style manual: Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Lead section An introduction should contain a maximum of four paragraphs and should synthesize the entire article, without many explanations. See as an example this Madonna albums discography article, it is in line with Wikipedia standards and I hope it can help you.Thanks for your atention.--88marcus (talk) 22:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the links. Whilst editing, it became apparent the lead section was growing much too long. At least with all the major points now highlighted, it will be easier to condense them. Also, I have considered splitting the discography into albums and singles — in the way Madonna and Mariah Carey's are. JonathanLGardner (talk) 22:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Supremes & The Temptations - The Weight (Netherlands).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes & The Temptations - The Weight (Netherlands).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Supremes & The Temptations - The Weight (Netherlands).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes & The Temptations - The Weight (Netherlands).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Supremes & The Temptations - The Weight (Netherlands).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes & The Temptations - The Weight (Netherlands).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meet The Supremes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateside.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Respect (2021 American film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dr. Feelgood and Ted White.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Supremes discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Always and Funny Girl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Faith Evans discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Estelle, 112 and Carl Thomas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:The Supremes - L'amore Verra (You Can't Hurry Love).png

The file File:The Supremes - L'amore Verra (You Can't Hurry Love).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

More than one cover art used as lead image. Insufficiently supported by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC#8 and/or WP:NFCC#3a.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

"Hip Hop" in the Soul/R&B Singles chart's name an anachronism in The Supremes discography

The reason the "HH" was removed from the column's title was because it stood for "Hip Hop", a genre that did not exist during The Supremes' heyday, and if there was a WP:ANACHRONISM guideline in the Manual of Style, any references to "hip hop" in the Soul/Black/R&B Singles chart's name should be avoided whereever possible, because the words "hip hop" were not added to the chart's name until 1999, long after The Supremes have disbanded. Can't you find a different solution on how the column should be titled (like changing the title to "US Soul" or something) instead of simply going back to the previous version? Jim856796 (talk) 02:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

I completely understand and I am with you in that R&B/HH is not ideal for older discographies, but it's the present name of those charts and how the source Billboard refers to them in all the references. The Supremes discography has charted throughout every name change the chart has had - so I'm unsure of how we'd show this accurately as the albums and singles charts are seperated by decade but the name changes were in 1969, 1978, 1990 and 1999. Would we seperate the tables for each name change? Further complicating matters is the newer R&B Songs and Adult R&B charts. Removing the /HH could cause confusion with the newer R&B Songs and R&B Albums charts whilst calling it US Soul could also be seen as referring to the Adult R&B chart where US soul music tends to chart nowadays. I'm not quite sure what the best fix is, but at least the abbreviation is consistent with the present name and the references, so there's no confusion as to what is being referenced. JonathanLGardner (talk) 19:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

What if I told you I didn't care about the existence of those other, newer charts you mentioned, and I just wanted any references to hip-hop/rap on those chart tables to be avoided, period? I mean, I can't just pretend that the "HH" stands for something else besides hip-hop/rap. I think the The Supremes discography page should just be barred from consideration for GA or FA status If you let the anachronistic-looking "HH" stand on the R&B-chart column, because it could be easily edit-warred over.Jim856796 (talk) 20:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Wow...as I stated before I completely understand your complaints, however, the source and compiler of the chart, Billboard themselves now reference the chart as the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart, to reflect the current musical landscape - The Supremes have charted on the chart throughout its various name changes, so how would one decide which is the best for tables which span across numerous changes? If you go to the page I've referred to you can see it is the same chart The Supremes charted on in the 60s, but has gone through numerous name changes. When you click the references for the charts, they all go back to The Supremes' chart history on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart. It would be inaccurate to name it anything else, especially given the very recent R&B Songs chart which is the current Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs minus the Hip-Hop songs. This chart did not exist until late 2012! How is it more accurate to refer to a chart that started in 2012 but The Supremes debuted on Billboard in 1962? Thus, referring to the chart by its current name, as the source does makes it easier for casual readers to follow. They can see - accurately - that it is the same chart The Supremes topped many times that newer artists appear on, simply with a new name. Your issue should be with Billboard, not me. I'm simply trying to make The Supremes discography featured list status. There is no room for ambiguity or personal opinion. The source rules. It doesn't make sense to reference a source for a chart and call it something else because you don't like the genre mentioned. The Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs and Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums charts are the same charts The Supremes charted on in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 2000s. R&B Songs and R&B Albums were created in 2012 under different criteria. JonathanLGardner (talk) 22:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Frankly, the (current) name of the R&B Hip Hop chart going to make somebody ask how the rap/hip-hop genre is going to exist in the 1960s or earlier. Can footnotes detailing the R&B/Hip-Hop chart's name changes during The Supremes' heyday work, or is that not a good-enough solution for you? For example, how about a disclaimer on the notelist saying the rap/hip-hop genre simply did not exist during The Supremes' heyday? Or is the best solution to this no solution at all? Simply going back to the previous version is just going to make me wish those newer R&B charts by Billboard has never been created. It should be noted the discographies of other major R&B artists who have charted around the same time as The Supremes do not have "HH" in the R&B Chart singles column.Jim856796 (talk) 03:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Okay, new solution: How about we just put the "HH" in parentheses on those tables if it can't be omitted entirely? Jim856796 (talk) 03:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

You Gets No Love writers

Hi Jonathan my name is Toni Coleman and I co/wrote You gets no love by Faith evans. You have Trevell Coleman and I’d like you to correct please. User:2600:6C50:57F:5CD4:3CCA:2822:1581:B390 (User talk:2600:6C50:57F:5CD4:3CCA:2822:1581:B390)

Hi Toni, I've only worked on the chart history and discography of Faith Evans on wikipedia. I didn't list the writers or producers on any of her records. My edits on You Gets No Love have been solely regarding the song's chart peaks in the UK. According to the article, the credits are taken from the liner notes of the Faithfully album. Do you have any references with your name listed as a writer of the song? JonathanLGardner (talk) 01:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Diana Ross chart trajectory

Hi. I appreciate you adding chart information to an article I started, but detailing what a song reached each week like here falls under WP:CHARTTRAJ. Casual readers are not interested in reading a play-by-play of what position a song rose to each week (this was decided years ago on Wikipedia), and the focus on UK charts when Ross is an American artist, even if these UK sales charts are the only charts the songs appeared on and when the article is about the album and not the song(s), is odd. Sometimes we say the debut and subsequent peak, but really the peak is what is most important. Ss112 12:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

The Supremes discography

Hi there! I saw you nominated The Supremes discography for GA status. I wanted to let you know that since discography pages are considered lists, they do not qualify as being considered for GAN. Therefore, I recommend you revert that and nominate at FAC. Cheers :-) – zmbro _(talk) 17:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I was going by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies which currently has 33 pages rated GA including Robert Johnson recordings. I've since reverted the GA nomination though and will look into FAC. Many thanks. JonathanLGardner (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jennifer Hudson discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Hamilton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Mary - I Sings.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mary Mary - I Sings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Supremes discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jennifer Hudson - Respect OST.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jennifer Hudson - Respect OST.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:The Source (Feat. Candi Staton) - You Got The Love.jpg

The file File:The Source (Feat. Candi Staton) - You Got The Love.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Displaying more than one cover art not compliant with WP:NFCC#3a. Preferring File:You Got the Love by The Source featuring Candi Staton UK 1991 reissue.png....

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ice (Kelly Rowland song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tears Always Win, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Adding chart positions below 200

Hi Jonathan. I've noticed that you've added Tophit chart peaks below 200 to discographies and song articles. Please note that there was a discussion about this and a consensus formed to make WP:Record charts#Charts with more than 200 positions. We now no longer consider chart positions lower than 200 notable enough to include as we are not an indiscriminate collection of information. Thanks. Ss112 20:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Destiny's Child - Survivor (DVD1).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Destiny's Child - Survivor (DVD1).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Infodisc.fr

Hello, The above website is not a reliable website for sales. It even says here that it doesn't provide sales figures. It says This Ranking is absolutely not a reflection of sales but simply a summary of information from the time. This is based on sales it thinks songs or albums at certain positions should have had. Pease stop adding it to articles. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 18:47, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Discographies should have a maximum of 10 charts in any wikitable

Hi. Regarding your edits to Mary Mary discography in December last year, please maintain a maximum of 10 charts in all discography wikitables. We should not attempt to fit every chart an artist has ever appeared on on a discography, as this is outside their scope. Discographies were never intended as a list of charts first and foremost. It's also an WP:ACCESSIBILITY issue as more than 10 columns widens the screen on some devices, can make text smaller to fit, and makes tables convoluted, which is against their purpose to format information in an easily accessible way. Please bear this in mind going forward, as it appears you're still occasionally adding charts exceeding 10 to wikitables. The charts we include amongst the 10 are only supposed to be an overview and/or the markets an artist performed the best in. Thanks. Ss112 14:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

• "There are other charts that could be removed with less appearances"...Mate, Williams had one appearance on the Adult R&B airplay chart. There's no value less than one (zero is the absence of a value). Also, it's a bit rich to tell me to "start a discussion as to which" chart should be removed, when I already started a discussion informing you to stop adding more than 10 charts that you didn't even reply to. Maybe don't add more than 10 charts and there won't need to be a discussion? Ss112 02:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kierra Sheard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mali Music.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of best-selling female music artists in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page What a Feeling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CeCe Winans discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gabriela Rocha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michelle Williams discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Jackson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mica Paris - Stay.jpeg

The file File:Mica Paris - Stay.jpeg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UK music charts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CCM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited CeCe Winans discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alabaster Box.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hot Gospel Songs

added links pointing to Hurricane (song), Crowder and Long Live Love

The Battle Is the Lord's

added a link pointing to Save the World

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirk Franklin discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noname.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Top Gospel Albums, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tasha Cobbs Leonard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blanca.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

File:The Supremes - Someday We'll Be Together (Italy).png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Supremes - Someday We'll Be Together (Italy).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 04:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:1969 - Someday We'll Be Together.png

Thanks for uploading File:1969 - Someday We'll Be Together.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 11:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Kim Weston - Take Me in Your Arms (Rock Me a Little While).png

Thanks for uploading File:Kim Weston - Take Me in Your Arms (Rock Me a Little While).png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:The Supremes - Nathan Jones (Germany).png

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Thank You Darling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thank You Darling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thank You Darling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

George Ho (talk) 07:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:The Supremes - Baby Love (Netherlands 1).png

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes - Baby Love (Netherlands 1).png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:The Supremes - Somethings You Never Get Used To.png

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes - Somethings You Never Get Used To.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Supremes - Somethings You Never Get Used To.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes - Somethings You Never Get Used To.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:The Supremes & The Temptations - I Second That Emotion (Denmark).png

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes & The Temptations - I Second That Emotion (Denmark).png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:The Supremes - The Happening (Netherlands).png

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:1966 - Love Is Like An Itching In My Heart.png

Thanks for uploading File:1966 - Love Is Like An Itching In My Heart.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:The Supremes - Love Is Here and Now You're Gone (Netherlands).png
• File:The Supremes - Love Is Here and Now You're Gone (Sweden).png

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:The Supremes - Back in My Arms Again (Sweden).png

The file File:The Supremes - Back in My Arms Again (Sweden).png has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:1964 - Where Did Our Love Go (Stateside).png

Thanks for uploading File:1964 - Where Did Our Love Go (Stateside).png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:1969 - I'm Livin' In Shame (Alternate Cover).png

Thanks for uploading File:1969 - I'm Livin' In Shame (Alternate Cover).png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:1969 - I'm Livin' In Shame.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:The Supremes - Thank You Darling (Netherlands) 1.png

The file File:The Supremes - Thank You Darling (Netherlands) 1.png has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:The Supremes - Thank You Darling (Germany).png

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Supremes - Thank You Darling (Germany).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes - Thank You Darling (Germany).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Supremes - Thank You Darling (Netherlands) 1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes - Thank You Darling (Netherlands) 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:The Supremes - Come See About Me.png

Thanks for uploading File:The Supremes - Come See About Me.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:The Supremes - Come See About Me (Denmark).png

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karen Clark Sheard discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stanley Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Khia - MotorMouf aka Khia Shamone.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khia - MotorMouf aka Khia Shamone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Total Praise

added links pointing to Fantasia and Richard Smallwood

Top Gospel Albums

added a link pointing to Richard Smallwood

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirk Franklin discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anthony Evans, Jordan Smith and Can You Feel It.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Attempts to ping me don't work

Nice try pinging me in something like 10 edit summaries in September 2022 on Alexandra Burke discography here; I have had pings turned off for years and I literally only just noticed it more than two years later. That was also completely unnecessary and seems very petty. Why would I need that many pings when one would have sufficed? I also am not required to start discussions before boldly removing content; nobody is. It is no editor's responsibility to provide a working source for one that is now dead. Bear that in mind going forward, and don't deliberately be annoying and (attempt to) ping editors 10 different times, Jonathan. Thank you. Ss112 09:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Very confused by this post. Definately didn't intend to alert you when making the edits...so very long ago. You flagged an issue, I resolved it and thought nothing else of it. If you were alerted each time, I apologise, it was not intentional. All the best JonathanLGardner (talk) 09:00, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

I told you I have pings turned off, so no, I was not notified. I would have posted here in September 2022 if I had been notified. But in case you didn't know, pinging a user is what typing User:So and so's username does. It gives them a red "1" notification each time you do it, even in edit summaries. Ss112 13:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirk Franklin discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Babyface and Carl Thomas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Reverting without giving a reason

I think that if you revert an edit, be it by an new editor or a veteran of 17 years with 200,000 edits, the minimum curtesy is to give a reason in the edit summary. Muhandes (talk) 14:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yolanda Adams discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William McDowell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC)