User talk:Johnny Stormer

June 2014

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia editing. It is noticeable that you have not been including an edit summary with your edits to date. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors to quickly understand why you made a change, so please always fill in the edit summary field. Thank you. Melbourne3163 (talk) 22:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Stormer, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Johnny Stormer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tom Liberatore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}
**'''Chris Grant Medal - [[Western Bulldogs] Best First Year Player''': 2011

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1996 Brownlow Medal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| holder = [[Michael Voss]] ([[Brisbane Bears]]) [[James Hird]] ([[Essendon Football Club|Essendon]] 21 votes

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2003 Brownlow Medal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| '''=4th''' || [[Ben Cousins]] ([[West Coast Eagles|West Coast]] [[Shane Crawford]] ([[Hawthorn Football Club|Hawthorn]]) [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2005 Brownlow Medal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| '''4th''' || [[Scott West]] ([[Western Bulldogs]] || '''17'''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2012 Brownlow Medal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; font-size: 90%;"
Club|Richmond]]) [[Sam Mitchell (footballer)|Sam Mitchell]] {[[Hawthorn Football Club|Hawthorn]]) || '''26'''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1998 Brownlow Medal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Robert Harvey

1999 Brownlow Medal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Matthew Richardson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brownlow articles

Hi there, thanks for creating all the individual year Brownlow Medal articles, but as some editors get technical about references vs external links, can you try to include at least one inline reference in each article. A good & easily accessible reference source is the Fairfax news store at [1] or the Football Record archive at the State Library of Victoria ([2]). If you pulled up each Grand Final Footy Record, you'd be bound to find a story about the winner. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 04:11, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1995 Brownlow Medal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Robert Harvey

1996 Brownlow Medal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Robert Harvey

1997 Brownlow Medal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Robert Harvey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gavin Wanganeen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chris Judd may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}
**'''[[AFL Premiership]] ([[West Coast Eagles|West Coast]]''': 2006 (Captain)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Corey Enright may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:23, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mal Michael may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}
ref>[http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/story/68284] Mal Michael Joins Nilma Darnum Bombers 2008-2009]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:27, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sam Mitchell (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mark Williams (Australian footballer born 1983) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

with Ballan in the [[Central Highlands Football League]] for 2012 and 2013.<ref>O'Neill, David (4 April 2012 [http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/article/2012/04/04/464561_country-footy.html
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ben Reid may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:44, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scott Pendlebury may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm Wikicology. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Leigh Matthews, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikicology (talk) 07:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have a barnstar

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For all your work adding statistics tables to Collingwood players' pages. You are doing a fantastic job. --SuperJew (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matthew Boyd may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tadhg Kennelly may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

00.html Swans draw on spirit of Kelly] By Jenny McAsey for FoxSports.com.au 11 September 2008]</ref>
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Will Langford may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Premiership Player: [[2014 AFL Grand Final|2014]])
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics for AFL Players and Coaches

I think you've done a great job with all the statistics, however, when doing the colour blocks, for most games played it isn't relevant to be coloured in as a lot of players in the league play 22 or 25 games. It doesn't give a true reflection of "most in the league" for that statistic as it's not unique. Also colouring in the premiership year isn't relevant because it's already noted in career highlights for that individual. So for your further edits, please just colour in the statistics that are relevant, i.e. kicks, handballs, disposals, marks, and tackles as they are more of an achievement if it is the most in the league. Thanks Flickerd (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnny Stormer: Also as per the wikiproject for Australian rules football please use the template for the clubs in the stats tables (here's the guide Templates). I've noticed in a lot of the tables that you have created and you have also changed already made tables, you've linked clubs as Adelaide Football Club|Adelaide as opposed to the {{AFL Ade}} template, please try and use the templates. Thanks Flickerd (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013 AFL Goal of the Year

added a link pointing to Goal of the Year

2014 AFL Goal of the Year

added a link pointing to Goal of the Year

2015 AFL Goal of the Year

added a link pointing to Goal of the Year

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Team templates

Hey, I've noticed that you're still using the Adelaide Football Club|Adelaide template for the AFL statistic tables, can you please use the appropriate template in accordance with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian rules football, I've listed them for all the teams.
{{AFL Ade}} – Adelaide
{{AFL BB}} – Brisbane Bears
{{AFL BL}} –Brisbane Lions
{{AFL Car}} – Carlton
{{AFL Ess}} – Essendon
{{AFL Fit}} –Fitzroy
{{AFL Foo}} –Footscray
{{AFL Fre}} – Fremantle
{{AFL Gee}} – Geelong
{{AFL GC}} – Gold Coast
{{AFL GWS}} – Greater Western Sydney
{{AFL Haw}} – Hawthorn
{{AFL Mel}} – Melbourne
{{AFL Nor}} – North Melbourne, {{AFL Kan}} – Kangaroos (between 1999–2007)
{{AFL Por}} – Port Adelaide
{{AFL Ric}} – Richmond
{{AFL StK}} – St Kilda
{{AFL Syd}} – Sydney
{{AFL WB}} – Western Bulldogs
{{AFL WC}} – West Coast

Please use this from now on because I'm getting tired of having to tidy them up after you. Thanks Flickerd (talk) 10:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glenn Maxwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Harold Ball Memorial Trophy

Template:Harold Ball Memorial Trophy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

I also nominated for deletion the duplicities Harold Ball Memorial Trophy winners and Harold Ball Memorial Trophy Winners.

--SuperJew (talk) 09:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics ref accessdates and spaces

Hi, I've noticed that when you update stats that you are adding a space before the reference and updating the accessdate each time, just letting you know that there should be no space before the reference per MOS:REFPUNCT and you don't need to update the accessdate each time (and shouldn't either), the accessdate is from when the reference was first accessed. Thanks! Flickerd (talk) 11:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI on ruckman stats

Hey, just letting you know that per a discussion at WT:AFL, the ruckman stats table template has been reordered (below) to match the non-ruckman stats table, just a heads up for future additions of the ruckman stats table. Thanks, Flickerd (talk) 08:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Season	Team	No.	Games	Totals								Averages (per game)
Season	Team	No.	Games	G	B	K	H	D	M	T	H/O	G	B	K	H	D	M	T	H/O

Space before references

Hi, can you please stop adding spaces before references per WP:REFPUNCT in the Wikipedia Manual of Style with the exact wording "the ref tags should immediately follow the text to which the footnote applies, with no intervening space", as I've reminded you previously. Thanks, Flickerd (talk) 02:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Kurt Tippett. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. I know you've seen my previous requests about spaces before references, it is very clear in the Manual of Style to not do it, and the first time I asked you to discontinue doing it, you did so, so I'm unsure why you've reverted back to adding the space and why you would go and re-add it on Kurt Tippett once I removed it. I don't want to continue writing on your talkpage and be ignored, so please take notice and stop adding the space; I'm not making this up, it's very clear in the Manual of Style. Flickerd (talk) 05:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Johnny Stormer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Johnny Stormer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Johnny Stormer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elliot Yeo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:26, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proud Mary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stats columns in cricket inboxes

Hi,

I noticed a coupe of edits from today where you added a fifth column in cricket infobox. The cricketer infobox only handles four columns, so adding a fifth one throws an error code - which is how come I found the problem. Might just want to be aware of that. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Patrick Cripps. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 04:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Joel Selwood

I have nominated Joel Selwood for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 01:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Petracca. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop adding bolds for career-highs, as it's not something that we do at AFL/AFLW pages. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 23:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Steele, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 14:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:REFSPACE

You seem to be repeatedly re-inserting spaces before ref tags, eg [3][4], after I have removed those spaces. Please read MOS:REFSPACE, which says "All ref tags should immediately follow the text to which the footnote applies, with no intervening space." Thanks, Mitch Ames (talk) 02:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics section/table formatting

While you appear to have taken notice of the more recent changes to statistics tables (thanks for removing the row colours to make way for the zebra stripes), there are still some things that you're doing wrong. Please note the changes that I made to the format of Ryan Clarke's statistics section with this edit:

No unnecessary indentation, and the wording of the note should be "Updated to..." rather than "Statistics are correct to..."; the full stop's outside the italics as well, not inside.
No rowscopes, as it's easier to distinguish between the seasons if they're the same colour as their respective rows; the way you had formatted them in this instance, they were just useless code anyway.
Season, club and guernsey number are on one row of code, statistics are on the other.
Brownlow vote cells for the current season are left blank until the votes are awarded, so no need for the N/A.
Career statistics are formatted as a row, like the individual season statistics.

Thought I'd reach out given you edit more of these tables than me, so might as well point you in the right direction. While on this topic, for the last time, please do not add boldface to career-high statistics like with basketball statistics tables – I've already warned you more than enough times; thanks. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 16:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:One-time VFL/AFL Premiership coach

A tag has been placed on Category:One-time VFL/AFL Premiership coach indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Category:Two-time VFL/AFL Premiership coach

The page Category:Two-time VFL/AFL Premiership coach has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coaches of Australian rules football has been nominated for merging

Category:Coaches of Australian rules football has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robby (talk) 09:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bailey Laurie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bailey Laurie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Judd McVee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Judd McVee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob van Rooyen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jacob van Rooyen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob van Rooyen (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Jacob Van Rooyen instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob van Rooyen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 11:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 May 24 § Category:Two-time VFL/AFL Premiership players

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 May 24 § Category:Two-time VFL/AFL Premiership players. Qwerfjkl talk 11:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judd McVee has been accepted

Judd McVee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SportingFlyer T·C 23:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob van Rooyen has been accepted

Jacob van Rooyen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The-Pope (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nat Fyfe, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 08:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bailey Laurie (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nearly all of the sources are passing mentions, i.e. not in-depth. [5] This source looks OK, but this drafts needs more in-depth sources. Stats table or a single mention is not significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bailey Laurie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bailey Laurie

Hello, Johnny Stormer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bailey Laurie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Johnny Stormer. Thank you for your work on Taj Woewodin. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tyler Sellers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tyler Sellers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Sellers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Fonti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Fonti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Fonti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 06:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New articles need better references

Hi there, 10 years ago (look up above) I advised you to put better references in your articles. In that time, the old notability guideline of WP:NAFL (played at least 1 AFL game) has been eliminated, and the general notability guideline of requiring multiple significant, independent, reliable sources is being strictly enforced by some editors. Hence, creating articles about players that only have brief mentions (not significant), or from club or AFL linked references (not independent) is going to continue to result in AFDs like Fonti and Sellers. Please look for at least 1, preferably more than 1, independent newspaper ref for any future articles that you create. The-Pope (talk) 12:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]