User talk:JohnRogers

Hello, John Rogers. Welcome to Wikipedia.

A few tips for you to start going. (I'll send more if I see that I can help you :-)

Just edit stuff off the cuff for a while. We like that!
When you have time, check out Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers + the links in there.
You can sign your stuff on talk pages with ~~~~ It will convert to your username + the time. "anon" is fine too.
If puzzled, put a question on Wikipedia:Village pump, or feel free to ask me on my talk page if it's a very general question.
Most of all, have fun but take our work seriously!

-- Cimon Avaro on a pogo-stick 02:50 27 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Hi John, Blue Amberol Records doesn't make sense at the present. It doesn't mention the article's subject, and appears to be just disc listing. Start with eg Blue Amberol Records is a US(?) record lable whose titles include...

jimfbleak

I'm enjoying your contributions. One thing I'm wondering about is that lots of them have lots of unneeded html programing in them;

 "”&nbsp;&nbsp;  &nbsp"

etc. Are you adding those yourself, or is that an artifact of some program you're using? Wondering simply, -- Infrogmation 16:56, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Hi John, nice work except one thing - album and film titles should be italics not quotes. See Wikipedia style guide. Iam 05:34, Oct 19, 2003 (UTC)

...And please use the wiki 2 ' rather than html. Otherwise, keep up the good work! Cheers, -- Infrogmation 01:21, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Also, you've recently been converting song titles to italics -- according to the style guide for titles, song titles should be in "real" quotes rather than italicized (album titles are italicized):

"Red House" first appeared on the Jimi Hendrix album Are You Experienced?.

Perhaps you can reprogram your parser to change these to hard quotes? Jgm 13:30, 27 Oct 2003 (UTC)

You have been doing a lot of good work and I thought I would mention that Tiles 06:55, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Thank you. I find the formatting guide (or is that rules) to be somewhat confusing but the data is worth the effort. If only there was a wiki symbol for Tab (sigh). John Rogers

There is. the semicolon ":", when it is the first character in a line. Actually, it works like an "indent" function; long lines are also wrapped. Hope this helps. -- Viajero 20:28, 29 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Music, music, music

Hello. I don't think our paths have really crossed before. I'm glad that you are going around tidying up after me. Deb 21:18, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. That's a good suggestion of yours - though, now that we have the "Category" facility, I can see all lists being outlawed in the future. Actually, though, I think people are more likely to click on the name of the musical to get the credits, rather than on the year. It would be great to have a comprehensive set of articles about musicals, but I fear it will take quite a while - some are quite obscure, aren't they? Deb 19:05, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hi, John. Yes, I think we should aim to create articles for as many musicals as possible. Let's face it, most articles begin life as stubs, so there's no shame in it. Deb 16:52, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Pop singers categorization

Hi. Taking a look at Traditional pop music, your recategorizing the Boswell Sisters as "Traditional pop music singers" seems not to fit, so I'm reverting. Possibly the article &/or categorizations need some reworking, do you have any thoughts or suggestions on that? Cheers, -- Infrogmation 15:31, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Recording dates

You seem to have a lot of recording dates and similar information. Where are you getting it from? I'm actually glad to see your edits to my articles, since they supply info I didn't have and anything that builds up the articles about the songs I like is good. -- BRG 15:23, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The only source I'd seen online was for Perry Como's recordings, at [1] (which you probably know about). -- BRG 15:55, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hildegarde

You say: "Hildegarde recorded Darling,Je Vous Aime, Beaucoup on May 20, 1935.

I think it should be returned to the 1935 in music page."

That is very puzzling, because all the information I've managed to find gives the copyright date as 1936; how could it be recorded before it was written? (see, e. g. [2]) I wonder if your recording date is wrong? -- BRG 13:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further search does seem to confirm your 1935 date, as see [3] and [4]. -- BRG 14:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Clifford Grey

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Clifford Grey, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Clifford Grey seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Clifford Grey, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 10:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A request

Since you and I often work on the same pages, I just wanted to make a request. If you come across any page on which I put a reference to the discography at settlet.fateback.com, could you change it to the new URL, 78discography.com ? I've been trying to do this, but I'm sure there are a lot of pages I couldn't spot. -- BRG (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you search on settlet you will get a list of pages. I just updated The Syncopated Clock.

JohnRogers (talk) 06:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taking Liberties

Ta for updating the reference on Liberty Horn. I probably wouldn't have noticed that it was different because I know what it says and wouldn't need to go to it! Peridon (talk) 00:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello JohnRogers! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 58 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Evelyn Dall - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elsie Randolph

You may be interested to know that I've restored this article, which was deleted for some inexplicable reason. However, I'm having difficulty finding anything in on-line sources to add. Maybe you have some books or other references? Deb (talk) 20:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Pleasure of His Company

Hello, John. May I press you on this detail of the Stanley Holloway article? I have found that details are frustratingly hard to lay hands on, and if you have chapter and verse it would be a great help. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Popular Music says, "...and in 1977 toured Australia and the Far East in a tribute to Noël Coward entitled The Pleasure Of His Company." If the production was a stage play rather than a Coward tribute show, the main text of the Holloway article is wrong and will need to be amended. Most grateful for any citable information you may have about this production. Tim riley (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much - that's marvellously helpful. (Put not your trust in Oxford Dictionaries!) Tim riley (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moonlight Cocktail

Hello, can you please give me the source you used to verify that Moonlight Cocktail was recorded on December 8, 1941? Thank you. Cullen328 (talk) 14:21, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Holloway FAC

Hello, I hope you don't mind in me messaging you. I have noticed you made an edit on Mark Sheridan not so long ago. Judging by your user page, I'm assuming you take an interest in music hall, variety, victorian/edwardian actors and actresses etc? The reason I ask is that Stanley Holloway has now been nominated at FAC, but it has only received one set of comments there. Because of this I am desperatly trying to drum up some support. If you can review the article and comment here it would be much appreciated. If you know of anyone else who might be interested in doing so then please direct them accordingly. All the best -- Cassianto (talk) 17:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1924 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Punch Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Coslow and "Everybody Loves Somebody"

Hi. Are you sure about this? Some sources list him as a co-writer of that song and some don't. If you are positive and have convincing evidence, please also edit this, as he's still listed there (also, to help prevent having that credit introduced again in the future, I think it's crucial that you mention it – and give your proof – on the talk pages for both the song and Coslow). Regards – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 14:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please bear in mind that having a record sleeve or something where Coslow isn't listed doesn't necessarily mean he wasn't involved: The Trashmen, for example, had to be sued to give credit where it was due with regards to "Surfin' Bird". So maybe (I don't know) there is a case to be made for Coslow. – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 14:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An article titled “Same Old Song” appeared in the Los Angeles Times on August 3, 1997. It describes how Coslow received royalties for “Everybody Loves Somebody” as the result of an agreement with Irving Taylor and Ken Lane in 1950. Coslow’s claim was based on the melody of a 1920s song titled “Midnight Moon”.

“Midnight Moon” can be heard here:

http://archive.org/details/MidnightMoon

The first two lines of the chorus are very similar to the first two lines of the chorus of “Everybody Loves Somebody”. The verse and the remainder of the chorus are different. The main musical theme of “Everybody Loves Somebody” does appear to be inspired by “Midnight Moon”.

However it appears that Sam Coslow did not write “Midnight Moon”. The songwriter credits on the recording noted above are to Hare--Schafer—Bernard and this attribution is repeated in the Library of Congress database SONIC.

The transfer of copyright to Coslow is explained in this reference: http://books.google.se/books?id=2hTmIYzDdN0C&pg=PA9&lpg=PA9&dq=%22midnight+moon%22+%22coslow%22&source=bl&ots=xot5GmOGVH&sig=O5TaRAHKbfnz-usaZSRINX9EDCY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PoPPUOnQCNH24QSEsICoBg&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22midnight%20moon%22%20%22coslow%22&f=false

Coslow’s name does not appear on sheet music for “Everybody Loves Somebody” even after the 1950 royalties agreement. Neither “Midnight Moon” nor “Everybody Loves Somebody” is mentioned in Coslow’s autobiography.

The ASCAP entry for “Everybody Loves Somebody” is nonsensical because it credits Coslow as co-lyricist when his only claim to royalties was based on the melody!

In the light of this information, I believe my change should stand. The Wikipedia entry for “Everybody Loves Somebody” is technically correct because it reflects the ASCAP entry which has been supported in the courts, even though dubious.

I am indebted to members of the 78-l mailing list for identifying the quoted references.

JohnRogers (talk) 00:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Know Why (And So Do You), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anne Shelton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1944 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Explain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Hap-Hap-Happy Day Comment

It's a Hap-Hap-Happy Day is a song featured in the film, Gulliver's Travels (1939 film). A redirect[5] there is appropriate in my view. A blank page on the other hand is not appropriate; if you think the page has no useful content, then propose it for deletion at WP:RFD. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:55, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An article about the song could usefully link to the film. But a link from the name of the song merely precludes the opportunity to write an article about the song itself. I agree with you about the blank page but the problem is created by the initial link. Next time I try to undo this type of inappropriate link I will insert an article about the song.JohnRogers (talk) 04:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

You came to my attention because my Friend Wilf showed me a very tattered and heavily annotated copy of British Dance Bands on Record, 1911 - 1945 and pointed out that we had the wrong date for She Had to Go and Lose It at the Astor. When I got round to updating the article I found that you had beaten me to it.

Please note that I have moved your article drafts to User:JohnRogers/sandbox. There was nothing wrong with what you were doing but the convention is that your main user page is reserved for you to tell us as much or as little as you want about yourself. As a minimum, I would add where you live, at least as detailed as country.

You are allowed as many user sub-pages as you need so I would split Elsie Randolph out of your sandbox into User:JohnRogers/sandbox2 or User:JohnRogers/Elsie Randloph. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1935 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moon Over Miami (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Always (1925 song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Guy Lombardo]] & his Royal Canadians (with vocal by [[Kenny Gardner]] on January 3, 1947 and released on Decca 23817

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1949 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Rollins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Gus" Kahn, Lo These Many Years Later

Just ran down an old edit of yours @ 1915 in music. You listed an American song lyricist, Gus Kahn as Gustave Kahn. Close, but "Gus" was born in Germany as "Gustav" (no e). Thought you might still be interested (You were an engineer! (-; )Tapered (talk) 02:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Tapered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.129.159 (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited By the Light of the Silvery Moon (song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Billy Murray and Haydn Quartet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Memory Lane

Hi John Rogers. Unfortunately you revert of Memory Lane is against the established Wikipedia guidelines for disambiguation pages. Disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. Thus entries which do not link to an articles in which the search term is mentioned cannot be added. (And, each entry can have no more than exactly one navigable blue link, see the overview at WP:DDD) If you want to re-add the magazine, create a link to an article that readers might reasonably be looking for. Please also watch your edit summary use: "meddling" isn't the most Assume good faith-friendly word and a revert like this one is definitely not a minor edit. Cheers LittleWink (talk) 13:36, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

your Brenda Lee revert

I am baffled by your revert of my talk page note about Brenda Lee. This is an article suggestion. I am unsure about which article it might belong in, how it would best be presented, or if it is worthy of article inclusion. This is the first time ever I have seen someone delete-censor a talk page, and suggest that the material belongs in the article instead! Talk pages are the place to discuss possible article contents. That is what I was doing...-71.174.175.150 (talk) 15:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Whitburn's Pop Memories 1890-1954

I've noticed you've reverted a few instances where editors have referred to pre-1950s US chart positions. I don't know if you know Whitburn's book Pop Memories 1890-1954, in which he sets out "estimated" chart placings back to 1890 for recordings, based on a whole variety of published sources. I have a copy of the book. His methodology is somewhat dubious and has been criticised, but the book exists and Whitburn is normally regarded as a reliable source. My view has been that we should treat in the details in the book with great caution, but if we provide references it's OK to refer to it. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a copy of Whitburn's book. It could have been a useful resource but it fell into the trap of imagining chart positions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.129.159 (talk) 10:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1933 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Kelly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1726 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Carey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Hirolovesswords. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rudy Vallée without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hirolovesswords (talk) 12:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Sinatra

Dear John,

You undid my change

In Sinatra's early days, mafia boss [[Willie Moretti]] helped him for kickbacks and released Sinatra from his contract with [[Tommy Dorsey]]. Sinatra was present at the mafia [[Havana Conference]] in 1946.

These statements are referenced in the articles Willie Moretti and [Havana Conference]]. If you do not agree, you should change those articles with your own references, of course. Thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 20:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1942 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Young. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Almost Lost My Mind

Thanks for the revert, it appears that it is a 1949 song, but that makes, as it says, written in 1950, wrong. Do you want to amend? Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When reverting edits such as this please provide a summary of the reason why you believe the edit should be reverted. I created the link after watching last night's edition of Later...with Jools Holland and mishearing the name, and wondering what the hell Vera Lynn was doing on his show. Others may make the same mistake, and hatnotes are there for such instances. If you disagree with this reasoning then you need to discuss the matter rather than reverting it without a valid reason. This is Paul (talk) 11:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page discussion open if you wish to add your thoughts on the matter. This is Paul (talk) 11:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

+1 [6]. Otherwise you look like a vandal. Toddst1 (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for catching the error in Ned Wever's age at the time of his death. I should have spotted that. I have deleted the sentence containing the incorrect age. I appreciate your help. Eddie Blick (talk) 13:27, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1971 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Stevenson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited We're Going to Hang out the Washing on the Siegfried Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Carr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JohnRogers. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JohnRogers. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone to Watch Over Me (song)

Please read and understand WP:COVERSONG before you restore a useless laundry list in violation of Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs guidelines like you did in that article.

You Indiscriminately deleted the whole list including the best versions of the song. Be selective or stay out of it.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JohnRogers. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1960 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hey, Look Me Over (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JohnRogers. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing on Someone to Watch Over Me (song)

This edit has numerous problems:

There is a discussion on the talk page which you have ignored
You are ignoring WP:SONGCOVER
Not using an edit an edit summary and arbitrarily reverting another editor's constructive edit is considered bad practice

Please try to review the basic principles that we edit by and engage constructively with your fellow editors instead of arbitrary and capricious WP:IDONTLIKEIT editing like it appears you're engaging in. Toddst1 (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Dream a Little Dream of Me. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Reliable source (which I have subsequently added) says you're wrong. Assuming good faith, but clearly another example of seriously bad editing.

Again, if you revert another editor's work, be sure to:

Check the talk page and engage in the discussion before reverting or editing if that issue is being discussed
Back up your changes with one or more reliable sources
Use a meaningful edit summary.

Toddst1 (talk) 05:46, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring talk page discussion on yet another article

I noticed that you ignored another talk page discussion at Talk:Mildred_Bailey#Birth_of_Mildred_Bailey by repeating your deletion of her birth date here. (First time here.) It's absolutely clear that you were aware of this discussion because you commented here yet you ignored it, sure in your position that you are right, while disputing a reliable source without providing anything to back up your own position.

This is a canonical example of Wikipedia:Tendentious_editing#Disputing_the_reliability_of_apparently_good_sources while not providing anything to support your own position.

I realize you think you're right and in your mind (only), you're editing in good faith, but the way you're going about it is a serious and chronic problem. If it continues, you may be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 06:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1851 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1962 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Good Life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]