User talk:Joesayers
Welcome!
Darts
[edit]There is a proposal for a Wikiproject on darts, so why don't you join the proposal or discuss a Wikiproject for darts. Just click here and sign the proposal or discuss it. Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 17:51, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
I have created a WikiProject for darts, come along and help, sign up aswell. Need as much help as possible Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 11:13, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for signing the proposal but their already is a WikiProject for darts, sign up and help out. Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 17:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Unfinished discussion at WikiProject Darts
[edit]Hi, I invite you to finish the dispute for the importance ratings on darts articles.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Darts at 16:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC).
A little advice
[edit]Hi there. Thanks for your contributions to WikiProject Darts, but I'd like to give you a bit of advice. On the darts biography articles (such as the one you created for Louis Blundell), you use a lot of Darts Database references. A few of these are fine, but too many of them make the article look a little messy - personally, I prefer to use the PDC results articles on PDC.tv when appropriate. These are more reliable and professional than DDB, which is more of a database than a news source.
I hope this helps. Keep up the good work. CFuller (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah thanks its probably just a little laziness on my part really. I realise also it does look lazy, in future I'll try and vary the sources a bit, I will also work on amending the articles I have done this on. Thanks for the advice and if there is anything else dont hesitate to let me know User:joesayers talk
A GAN on Mervyn King has been put on hold to allow time to copy-edit, build the lead and add more inline citations. SilkTork ✔Tea time 23:43, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- The review has been closed. The article has not been listed. Work was not done during the time of the review. The article can be nominated again in the future, though it would make sense to deal with some of the issues raised in the review first. SilkTork ✔Tea time 15:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]I am just going to take a stab at this and say your a Tottenham fan. Anyway rivalry aside, the reason I blanked was because wikipedia does not have the right to show these matches. Look at my edit summary at the page. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 03:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Joesayers. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
TFL notification
[edit]Hi, Joesayers. I'm just posting to let you know that List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Shane Warne – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 10, 2020. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:24, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Louis Blundell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 11:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Reece Robinson (darts player) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reece Robinson (darts player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 11:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)