User talk:Jino john1996

January 2021

Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Indian mathematics without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 12:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Indian mathematics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Calculus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 15:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Calculus. Favonian (talk) 15:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Malayalam. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Austronesier (talk) 10:24, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of highest-grossing Malayalam films

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of highest-grossing Malayalam films, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to page List of highest-grossing Malayalam films did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. RangersRus (talk) 17:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jino john1996! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Malabar Muslims that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 05:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned source does not mention it so that's why I removed it Jino john1996 (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to page List of highest-grossing Malayalam films did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Please refer to WP:ICTFSOURCES for what reliable sources you can use. RangersRus (talk) 18:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why did you revert my content? Multiple sources says that film grossed 65 to 70 crore. Jino john1996 (talk) 15:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did not use reliable source and refer to WP:ICTFSOURCES list for what reliable sources you can use. bollymoviereviewz is not reliable. If you have any question about a source that is not listed, please ask question on ICTF talk page. RangersRus (talk) 03:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay i did not know that. I will try to find a source mentioned there Jino john1996 (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what about imdb? Jino john1996 (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB is only good for external link if the subject of the entire page is exactly the same as the subject of the IMDb page that you're linking. Anything else is user-generated and not reliable. Refer to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#IMDb. RangersRus (talk) 23:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]