User talk:Jimbojunior

Note

This is to:

• Cottycrimge (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Jamie-Burk (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Jimbojunior (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

You obviously all know each other or are possibly the same person. If you are only one person, please do not make any more accounts.

I know Wiki markup is challenging and interesting. Experiment for as long as you want. However, please confine your test edits to your own user space or the Wikipedia:Sandbox‎, and please do not make any more disruptive edits. Please do not make any more test pages that are templates or articles. Ask me or the teahouse if you need help. We are friendly here.

Consider making one of these articles:

• Wikipedia:Requested articles/Images

If you do, make one. Add sources. Work on it. Do not just make lots with a single sentence each. Pick one and build it. You will feel satisfied and happy with yourself. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:48, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your future at Wikipedia

I'm sending this to all 4 of you:

First, are there any more accounts that are not listed below?

• Cottycrimge (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (2 edits)
• Jamie-Burk (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (111 edits)
• Jimbojunior (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (117 edits)
• Mr-roland-rat (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (9 edits)

So, the 4 of you (if in fact you are 4 different people) have made a total of 239 edits. None of those have been constructive. You have created useless pages, added copyvio images to your userpages, asked questions about how to do this and that, and none of it to do with helping build the encyclopedia. You are wasting community resources. You are permitted to experiment in your own userspace, but not if it is disruptive.

You must choose what you will do next:

1. Start to edit constructively (the best and most enjoyable choice)
2. Leave
3. Persist in making unconstructive edits without making any significant number of constructive edits

If you choose 3 then one or all of you may be blocked indefinitely from editing per WP:NOTHERE.

If you need help getting started, please ask. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock-un|Your reason here}}. But, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I have blocked all 5 accounts per WP:NOTHERE and WP:CIR. I think you are all nice, well-meaning people. However, I do not think that you understand that to make edits here means to make constructive edits that help build the encyclopedia. Out of hundreds of edits combined, there have been none. Please return to Wikipedia if and when you feel capable of making such edits. For now, please consider joining each other at another website such as Wikia where you can construct something you are all interested in. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:45, 22 July 2015 (UTC)