Jump to content

User talk:Jha09/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Welcome

Hello, Jha09, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animal (2023 film) (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ts12rActalk to me 14:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jha09! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ts12rActalk to me 14:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— DaxServer (t · c) 12:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I noticed that in this edit to Shruti Sharma (actress), you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! — DaxServer (t · c) 18:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. In Multiple articles you've edited today you've added text about being the most popular/paid or among the top, and none of it was sourced. Please don't do that. Those are significant claims, and need to be mentioned in the article body, attributed to the who's making the claim and MUST be backed by solid, reputable sources. Not just throwaway lines in articles, but some discussion about why. Ravensfire (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. You've continued with the same issues highlighted in my warning a few days ago. Please stop, READ these messages, understand that they are important and ask question if you don't get why you are being reverted. If you continue as you are, you'll probably end up blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 04:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Will take care of it Jha09 (talk) 17:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Sections

Hi. Please stop removing valid section titles, like in Samantha Ruth Prabhu. Please use edit summaries. — DaxServer (t · c) 18:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Could you please respond to me? Please note that communication is required for collaborative editing. — DaxServer (t · c) 19:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

I will take care of it. Jha09 (talk) 17:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! — DaxServer (t · c) 09:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaan Khan (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two lead roles in TV shows is borderline notable, and the sources cited don't provide enough WP:RS significant coverage. However, the main reason for declining is that the referencing is inadequate; eg. the entire 'Early life' section is unsupported, in violation of WP:BLP rules.

I also note that this has been deleted twice following AfD, most recently less than 12 months ago and not much seems to have happened career-wise since then.

--
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rithvik Dhanjani. This needs to stop, you're continuing to add material to articles that's not supported by sources "It was his breakthrough and gave him immense acclaim and popularity", or is found only the in the article title "e of the most popular television actor" and in both cases, the text is very non-neutral and would be great on an entertainment website or blog. Wikipedia articles need to be neutral in tone and avoid the kind of language you're adding to articles. Please don't keep doing this, the next step is to ask for admins to review your editing and possible block you from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 14:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hiba Nawab. Wikibio is not and never has been a reliable source. You cannot just do a google search and take any result. You should know what is and is not a reliable source by now, you clearly don't. Spend some time reading WP:IRS. Ravensfire (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Other honours have been mentioned seprately in many celebrities wiki page. Why are you deleting it from Parineeti Chopra's page? Jha09 (talk) 14:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Imtiaz Ali (director). yet again, more unsourced... I'm too tired to go to ANI right now, but seriously, ANY MORE, I will be asking for a block. Ravensfire (talk) 19:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mrunal Thakur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

I am so sorry....i did'nt saw that.... 

Jha09 (talk) 07:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pranali Rathod have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please read filmography. ManaliJain (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Ravensfire. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Naga Chaitanya seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kanwar Dhillon. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 14:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Preetika Rao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

I am so sorry....will make the changes. Jha09 (talk) 06:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Your recent edits aren't constructive enough. I would request you to please read WP:BLP, WP:ICTFSOURCES, WP:RS, WP:FILMOGRAPHY and MOS:BODY. ManaliJain (talk) 04:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gracy Goswami
added a link pointing to Gujarati
Jayeshbhai Jordaar
added a link pointing to Gujarati
Mehreen Pirzada
added a link pointing to Pollywood

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Will do the changes. Jha09 (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Non-notable award(s)

This is regarding your recent contributions to Gracy Goswami, even though there are a few reliable sources out there who mention a particular award but the mentioned award isn't always contemplated as notable. Read WP:FILMCRITICLIST for more. In simple words, if an award has it's own page on Wikipedia than it could be considered and added otherwise not. ManaliJain (talk) 06:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok.Thank you Jha09 (talk) 06:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Alternate accounts

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please note, operating multiple accounts or evading ban policy on Wikipedia is is strictly discouraged. Multiple accounts are allowed under WP:SOCKLEGIT. If you are evading ban policy or operating multiple accounts, please disclosed your other accounts. If you think i made a mistake, please let me know. regards. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

I have only one account Jha09, but by mistake i once edited from 120.58.75.57 Jha09 (talk) 06:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kratika Sengar, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 16:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yukti Kapoor and Shivangi Joshi, you may be blocked from editing. Kindly read WP:BLP, WP:ICTFSOURCES, WP:RS, WP:FILMOGRAPHY and MOS:BODY. ManaliJain (talk) 04:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. ManaliJain (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katietalk 15:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jha09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not do any kind of disruptive edits all i added have sources to it. Thank you!!

Decline reason:

As you see nothing wrong with your edits, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Please take this time to read about WP:CITE and WP:RS and our other policies; otherwise, you will likely receive a substantially longer block once you resume editing. Yamla (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied, we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details, there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

  1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
    Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
    If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
  2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
    If you are able to edit the sandbox, you are not blocked from editing. Either the autoblock on your IP address has already expired, or you weren't blocked in the first place. Either way, you can resume editing.
  3. If you are still blocked, follow the directions below:
    1. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Unblock request" section.
    2. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page, and click save.
      If you cannot edit your own talk page, use the Unblock Ticket Request System to make your request.
Jha09 (talk) 05:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Information icon Please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 13:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Uunchai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uunchai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uunchai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravensfire (talk) 17:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Aetashaa Sansgiri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You've been warned about this before. This needs to stop. You've got too many edits for this to still be happening. Ravensfire (talk) 17:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Please restrain yourself from adding non-reliable sources persistently. Whatever content you want to add on Wikipedia articles has to be verifiable, which means that "reliable sources" must be able to support the material.

I kindly request you to read: WP:VERIFY, WP:RELIABLE, WP:ICTFSOURCES, WP:RSP rigorously.

If you need anymore help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or visit The Help desk for interactive assistance. Thanks, ManaliJain (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Ok.. Jha09 (talk) 17:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Information icon Hello, I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ManaliJain (talk) 03:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Information icon I kindly advise you to read WP:ORDER. ManaliJain (talk) 03:54, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vidhi Pandya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crime Patrol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for my mistake. Jha09 (talk) 13:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Basic mistakes

Hi Jha09. I just wanted to kindly request you to please keep a check on your edits before publishing them. Basic mistakes including grammar, punctuation, vocabulary and other structures of the language should be avoided as much as possible.

Like I'll give you an example of your own mistake. You use words "potray/potraying/potrayal" but instead it is "portray/portraying/portrayal".

If you want, you can use your sandbox to test or experiment. I hope this has become clear.

Thanks, happy editing! ManaliJain (talk) 16:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

ManaliJain, you should keep a check on your edits as you know nothing. 27.58.157.10 (talk) 17:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Will take care thank you Jha09 (talk) 02:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kinshuk Vaidya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kinshuk Vaidya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinshuk Vaidya (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 DIVINE  18:03, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ravi Bhatia
added a link pointing to Salim
Shaheer Sheikh
added a link pointing to Salim

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry!! Jha09 (talk) 11:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Sheetal Thakur

Make sure you also deal with Sheetal Thakur. Ravensfire (talk) 14:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Can you help me with this. Jha09 (talk) 15:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Alice Kaushik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice Kaushik, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Kaushik (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Warning

Information iconThis is to inform you that your "Award and Nomination" edit from Alice Kaushik and Pandya Store have been reverted because they were Unconstructive. You can't add any notable award till the time award ceremony genuinely happens. Right now only voting process is going on and award ceremony hasn't been held. So you can't add that thing. Pri2000 (talk) 11:32, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

@Pri2000: If nominations have been announced then you can add them with "pending" tag. Sid95Q (talk) 01:49, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shivangi Khedkar (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 12:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Animal (2023 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Animal (2023 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onmyway22 talk 09:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ekta Kaul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Sorry!! Jha09 (talk) 11:37, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bharat Ka Veer Putra – Maharana Pratap
added a link pointing to Ranthambore
Maharana Pratap
added a link pointing to Administrator

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Zaan Khan

Information icon Hello, Jha09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zaan Khan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jha09/Archive_1&oldid=1124356392"