User talk:Jewel15

Jewel15, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jewel15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Capitals-Penguins rivalry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Capitals-Penguins rivalry, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WNYY98 (talk) 19:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Penguins-Red Wings rivalry

The article Penguins-Red Wings rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Contains no encyclopedic information. Does not satisfy general notability or sports notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article creation

The articles you are trying to create might be notable topics but you need to produce content immediately that demonstrates that they are notable topics. Starting an infobox and then publishing the content is not the way to go about it. I suggest you try again by using the Draft namespace where you can work on articles without that pressure to have enough content from the outset. Nthep (talk) 20:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Cup playoff articles

Hey, I'm sorry that I had to revert a couple of the edits that you made to a few of these articles. It's nothing personal and anything that added relevant content to an article was kept.

Hopefully, you continue trying to add more content to these articles in future. Deadman137 (talk) 07:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Cup playoff articles

Hey no problem, Deadman. I included the (W-L-T-OTL) thing to give readers an understanding of how to read the series records, but if you don't feel it should be there, that's cool. I did have to put the Anaheim-Detroit and Chicago-Detroit rivalries under the "historical" category, because I genuinely feel those rivalries have completely died out because we (I'm a Red Wings fan) only play them twice a season and have never had a string of Stanley Cup Finals meetings, which I feel creates interconference rivalries (such as Edmonton-New York Islanders and Edmonton-Philadelphia in the 1980s, and Detroit-Pittsburgh in the late 2000s). Thanks for getting back to me! jewel15

Canucks–Flames rivalry

On this article, the all-time series is specifically between the Calgary Flames and Vancouver Canucks, not including stats from the Atlanta Flames. Please do not revert this. I don't want an edit war. Conyo14 (talk) 04:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canucks-Flames rivalry

Hey I'm sorry Conyo. I did not know that your info was based on the all-time series since the Flames relocated from Atlanta. I thought it was just someone trying to be difficult. Just curious, did you make this article? jewel15

Yes, I created the page for the article; all the info was on National Hockey League rivalries so really, I just moved the section in the rivalries article onto its own separate page while adding on some info into the Canucks Flames rivalry. Conyo14 (talk) 18:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original Six in 2017 Stanley Cup playoffs

Because it was not mentioned in 2011 nor 2014, there really is no need to mention it here on this article neither. Conyo14 (talk) 04:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Desert Center, California

added a link pointing to Phoenix

Oakville, Ontario

added a link pointing to Hamilton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Flyers–Penguins rivalry, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Marchjuly, sorry about that. I am new to Wikipedia, and thought that since those images were on another Wiki page, I could copy and paste them. Now I know why the hockey rivalry pages do not have team logos uploaded anymore. I didn't want to be difficult. Thanks for letting me know.

That's fine. Image use, partilculary non-free image use, can be a tricky thing sometimes and more experienced editors than yourself make often make mistakes. In general, non-free team logos are OK for stand-alone article about the team in question when they are used as the primary means of identification at the top of the article, but much harder to justify in other articles about individual seasons or rivalries, etc. or when used in other sections of an article. You use anything which is freely licensed or public domain if you want since such files are not subject to Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. Someone may have uploaded wordmarks for the teams, so trying checking c:Category:National Hockey League logos to see if there's any you want to use. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Historic NHL Rivalries Head-to-Head

If a rivalry is historic, then head-to-heads must be within the years listed, otherwise you're including updated stats that could suggest the rivalry is still on-going. Ex: MTL-QUE rivalry is specifically between Montreal and Quebec not Montreal and Colorado, so including stats about Montreal and Quebec plus Colorado would suggest Montreal still has a rivalry with a team (the Nordiques) that does not exist. You are welcome to put head-to-heads for the years listed for that section.

Also a reference is unnecessary for this statistic. Conyo14 (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that is much clearer than what you put down as a reason to delete the head-to-head record. I thought you meant that posting anything that related to the Wings' and Ducks' head to head record is irrelevant info. Jewel15 (talk) 21:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 03:49, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Jewel15 (talk) 04:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Caps–Pens rivalry

So I have made a large edit to your new page, please look over the changes I made and feel free to revert some stuff or ask me anything.

P.S. In regards to the W–L–T situation, don't. keep at W–L–T–OT for regular season for all head-to-heads. If a team doesn't have OT/SO losses just put 0. Conyo14 (talk) 22:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So I got rid of the markings due to the fact that you created an English article, and by wiki standards, the marings are only for their specific articles. When mentioned on other articles such as the one in question, they must adhere to English-wiki standards (no markings). I hope this has helped. Conyo14 (talk) 04:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That helps. I did not know that rule. Jewel15 (talk) 10:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Canadiens-Senators rivalry

Hello, Jewel15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Canadiens-Senators rivalry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 05:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jewel15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2004 Stanley Cup playoffs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devils–Flyers rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wells Fargo Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

If you want to keep reverting, please do. I'll be glad to take you to an administrator. If you can't use your edit summary, your edits will be seen as disruptive editing/vandalism, in which you will be reported. You clearly don't understand what is non-free content and Public Domain. Corky 16:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck. Please "take me to an administrator." Though I'm left to wonder how it's possible to take an anonymous Wiki user somewhere. You've been reported already for your disruptive edits. Jewel15 (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 National League Division Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1987 Jets note

Your second attempt at writing this was nearly perfect, good job. Deadman137 (talk) 10:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Italy-Spain rivalry

Your changing of info is incorrect. You can access the FIFA source [1] and change the teams with the drop down menu accordingly. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 00:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metropolitan Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NFL rivalry tables discussion

Hi Jewel15

I noticed that you were editing the format of the results tables for a couple of NFL Rivalry pages, namely those for the Dolphins-Patriots rivalry and the Bills-Jets rivalry. I wanted to get your feedback on why you wanted to revert those tables back to the original format from a more current template that can be found here, and if the new format was too difficult to see or navigate.

Thanks--WuTang94 (talk) 06:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jewel15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bruins-Leafs rivalry

Hi there. Thanks for your work on NHL rivalry related pages. I think a Bruins–Maple Leafs rivalry article is overdue due for creation. A redirect was made in 2016 to the NHL rivalries page, and there isn't even a summary section there—that should at least be there. Obviously the rivalry has been hotly contested ever since the 2013 Playoffs into the playoffs a couple years back and now, but does have some history as well. If you have time, I'd encourage its creation—I don't have the exact time or knowledge to bring give this a wide overview, but would certainly help if you decide to create it in the near future. I'd rather not deal with the stats part, but I could do most of the body. Let me know. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 16:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vaselineeeeeeee. I enjoy working on NHL rivalry pages, so I’m pleased to see you appreciate my work on them. During the NHL offseason, I’d be happy to work on a Bruins–Maple Leafs rivalry page. I must ask, what is it you want me to do? Research stats as well as game recaps? Let me know and I’ll be on it when the time comes. Thanks! Jewel15 (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the support. Yes, mostly stats like the ones in the infobox, but perhaps some of the earlier history as well. I'll probably start working on it in my sandbox in a week or so. I put the Leafs-Red Wings rivalry page there as a template; feel free to edit in my sandbox whenever you have a chance. Thanks so much. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 13:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox has been fixed and updated for the Bruins-Leafs rivalry page.Jewel15 (talk) 22:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2007 Stanley Cup Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Conference (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited League Championship Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cavaliers–Celtics rivalry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cavaliers–Celtics rivalry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cavaliers–Celtics rivalry. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2021 NBA Finals, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 05:16, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cavaliers–Celtics rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cavaliers–Celtics rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cavaliers–Celtics rivalry (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Frank Anchor 02:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]