User talk:Jehowahyereh

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions seems really suspicious to me, I feel I have every right to mention what happened and not interested in taking with you here. I haven't done any kind of paid editing and I was blocked for not any genuine reason. after I see the block , I found the tags and pages moved. Its really suspicious. Jehowahyereh (talk) 03:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jibin George Sebastian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jibin George Sebastian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jibin George Sebastian. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 10:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the article I created is entirely different from any previous version. I found that the previous version of the article was deleted in 2017 and most of the major events I have mentioned in the article about the artist happened after 2017, his first english movie released in theatre in 2019, his notable movie in malayalam released in 2019 and about his upcoming movies , albums etc major part of it happened after 2017 and I found many relevant news article about the artist published after 2017, so its irrelevant to quote that it is identical to a previous version and I contest the deletion of the article Jehowahyereh (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Pahunkat (talk) 14:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the article I created is entirely different from any previous version. I found that the previous version of the article was deleted in 2017 and most of the major events I have mentioned in the article about the artist happened after 2017, his first english movie released in theatre in 2019, his notable movie in malayalam released in 2019 and about his upcoming movies , albums etc major part of it happened after 2017 and I found many relevant news article about the artist published after 2017, so its irrelevant to quote that it is identical to a previous version and I contest the deletion of the article Jehowahyereh (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sreevidya Mullachery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sreevidya Mullachery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sreevidya Mullachery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 21:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kishen Das for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kishen Das, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kishen Das until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vezham moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vezham, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. See also: WP:NFF – robertsky (talk) 16:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, The movie Vezham has already announced its release date and its releasing on June 24th 2022, which is available in most of the major news sources . Enough significant news references has also been furnished in the article as references. Incase you have any issues with the article you may create an AFD discussion. Thanks

Jehowahyereh (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vezham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vezham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vezham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– robertsky (talk) 17:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

Stubs are too short article. It seems you misunderstood about stubs. Please refer WP:STUBS before adding stub templates in article. Happy editing Onmyway22 talk 07:31, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Noble Babu Thomas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Noble Babu Thomas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noble Babu Thomas. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply The new article about the artist is more of new content compared to the old deleted stuff as I have included recent events like he getting National Award for his movie which happened after the previous deletion and he has done 2-3 high gross and well acclaimed movies after the previous deletion. The article is not exactly the same and the speedy deletion tag is unwated. Please remove the tag. Thanks Jehowahyereh (talk) 14:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vijay Pravin Maharajan

The article Vijay Pravin Maharajan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Repeatedly CSDed, still effectively a puff piece, almost all of the given sources seem to not be independent, no evidence that this person is actually notable in any way

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 18:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diesel (2022 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sai Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Diesel (2022 film)

The article Diesel (2022 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFF. Delete or move to draft until release

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Meera Jasmine, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jayaram Kailas

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Jayaram Kailas has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

G4 can't be used to delete pages recreated after Soft delete. Please reinstate. Moreover the article is not the exact copy of the previous article. I have created the article and added new news articles and contents. Jehowahyereh (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jayaram Kailas

I am not planning to nominate Jayaram Kailas for AFD right now. Instead, I am searching for sources, both online and offline, to make sure it is not necessary to go through the AFD process again. If there are no improvements, I may consider resubmitting it for AFD in the near future. Thank you and have a great day. Akevsharma (talk) 12:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok brother Jehowahyereh (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjitha Menon moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ranjitha Menon. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and non-notable actress haven't done lead roles.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Misterrrrr (talk) 14:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ranjitha Menon. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jehowahyereh,

If you object to an article being moved to Draft space, please move it back, do not cut and paste the content on a main space page. This loses the edit history of the original article and is discouraged. It is perfectly okay to object to draftification but please address this with a move rather than a cut & paste job. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, the move was disabled. So I had to manually revert the unusual draftification and edit Jehowahyereh (talk) 13:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to this on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranjitha Menon (2nd nomination). In short: Ask for help if you are prohibited from doing something. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sure. As the person who draftied the article first and then tagged the original page for deletion, the move was not working. I will definetly as for help next time. Thanks Jehowahyereh (talk) 13:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been editing in wikipedia for around 4 years by now and haven't created or edited any page in returns of money. Last month, to be precise User:Akevsharma tagged a page Jayaram Kailas I created for PROD which was previously a soft delete and and admin User:UtherSRG not going with the rule of no prod for soft deleted page and I asked the user:Akevsharma, if you have any concerns you may go for AFD. Later User:Akevsharma messaged me I am not going to AFD now. Later I am finding now that I have be blocked for not any credible reason and of a sudden User:Akevsharma tagged the page Jayaram Kailas for AFD and moved my recently created page Abhilash Pillai_(film_writer) deleted previously by User:UtherSRG to draftspace.I strongly believe Wikipedia is not a place to show any revenge or the editors must not use tactics like this to delete any pages. I am confident enough to give valid point to AFD discussion of Jayaram Kailas if I was not blocked. I strongly believe that this block is of no valid reason as I edit and created pages mainly related to movies , artists , major finance firms etc. One more thing, I created Vijay Pravin Maharajan's page after consulting an admin advise and the page have no problems for months and right now it got problem and I am being blocked. Please unblock me Jehowahyereh (talk) 03:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)}}[reply]

GeneralNotability, I've tried to fix the formatting of this unblock request but have been unsuccessful. I tried to add the unblock request category and was unsuccesful at that as well. Maybe you know what the problem is. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand correctly, you're accusing that both UtherSRG and I are seeking revenge against you. However, I want to clarify that I am not the one who blocked you. I'm not an admin to block you. You got blocked only after I nominate Jayaram Kalias for AFD. It was an admin who blocked you due to your violation of Wikipedia's guidelines on paid editing. Therefore, it's important that you disclose any articles you were paid to write, and then only the admins will even consider your request for unblock. UtherSRG is one of the most reputed and experienced admin here. You cannot simply come and accuse them for taking revenge. Akevsharma (talk) 03:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: What happened is really suspicious. I feel I have the right to mention what happened in the request. I only mentioned what actually happened. I have been in wikipedia for past 4 years and haven't done any paid editing or got any blocks for any unethical editing. Morevoer I have asked an admin advice while creating Vijay Pravin Maharajan's page. I havent accused you or admin UtherSRG but mentioned what happened with the page Jayaram Kailas and your unusual speed for AFD yesterday related to my block. Jehowahyereh (talk) 03:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I went through all of the articles that you created and noticed they are having a strong flavour of UPE. There are several deleted and existing articles in question including BitsCrunch, Natalie Plain, Abid Anwar (actor), Deepak Menon etc. These are only a few. If I'm right this is the reason that you got blocked. I only moved your recent creations to draftspace as it's a procedure. And please refrain from making serious allegations against other editors without proper evidence. You can refer to this revision link https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1138394378, where I have clearly mentioned that I may consider renominating Jayaram Kailas for deletion again. Akevsharma (talk) 03:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to ask why you created VijayPravin Maharajan instead of creating it as Vijay Pravin Maharajan. It appears that you have tried gaming. You mentioned consulting an administrator before creating the page; could you provide any evidence of this? I find it interesting that BitsCrunch is a company in which Vijay Pravin Maharajan holds a key position. This is not a coincidence. You have a COI but you haven't declared. That's a violation. Akevsharma (talk) 04:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have created the page Vijay Pravin Maharajan not VijayPravin Maharajan. It might be moved later. You can find my admin consultation in my talk history. I have no COI and there is no point in insisting me to disclose. Moreover let me point out an interesting happening. Jayaram Kailas the page you tagged yesterday for deletion. His first movie page Akkaldhamayile Pennu which won Kerala Critics Film Award and the actress won Kerala State award was also tagged for deletion yesterday even though it having lot of featured news articles and interestingly User:UtherSRG placed the deletion comment stating it lacks GNG. Everything happened on 6th march yesterday. So much coincidence yesterday Jehowahyereh (talk) 04:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you are accusing that LordVoldemort728, UtherSRG, and I are targeting you? If that's the case, let's leave it at that. I don't wish to argue with you any further on that. Your block occurred almost three hours after Jayaram Kalias was nominated for AFD, so the block is unrelated to the AFD. Next, you haven't provided a clear response to my concerns. I couldn't find any revisions on your talk page that indicate you consulted an admin before creating Vijay Pravin Maharaj. You recreated Vijay Pravin Maharajan which got deleted multiple times due to promotional reasons. It's a clear indication of COI. What's your connection with Vijay Pravin and BitsCrunch? You can answer these questions if you wish to get unblocked. Even if you answer I'm not sure whether the admins will unblock you. Now comes the most suspicious part. You recreated some articles that were previously deleted as problematic. For instance, Abhilash Pillai (film writer) was initially created by a banned user Ameer al safar and you recreated it. Similarly, Takeshidjome, a blocked UPE user created Ranjitha Menon, which you recreated. This is not a coincidence. I just noticed that Rahulphotoshop who only added a photo of Abhilash Pillai to Wikipedia has been blocked for using multiple accounts. I'm curious to know whether they are connected to you, but only GeneralNotability can confirm that. Akevsharma (talk) 06:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:UthersRG, User:Akevsharma and I am not targeting you. We are following wikipedia's policies. Akevsharma nominated Jayaram Kailas for deletion because he think that he is not notable, UthersRG voted for deleting Jayaram Kailas and Akkaldhamayile Pennu because he also think that this topics are not notable and I nominated Akkaldhamayile Pennu because I also don't think that it is notable. We all are established editors and never argue or target anyone. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 08:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Akevsharma, I have recreated many deleted pages when I see enough articles to make the page live and correcting the problems those pages already had. Being a wikipedia editor we are supposed to research and help wikipedia grow and add reliable contents. You accused me of creating VijayPravin Maharajan which is factually incorrect. When you go to the deletion log of the article, you can see I was the first one to create the page. It was on september 2022. It was not any recreation. Later one admin deleted it and further the same admin undeleted it, later someother user named Abugate moved the article to VijayPravin Maharajan on 6th february and the admin Liz who messaged here previously deleted it today. So why did you accuse me of WP:Gamming ??? Jehowahyereh (talk) 08:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:LordVoldemort728 , you created your wikipedia account in 2022 and by february 2023 you created over 400 pages. So much established are you Jehowahyereh (talk) 08:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abhilash Pillai (film writer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abhilash Pillai (film writer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akevsharma (talk) 00:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VijayPravin Maharajan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, VijayPravin Maharajan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akevsharma (talk) 00:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #70397

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jehowahyereh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, My account was blocked on 6th March. I have been editing in wikipedia for around past 4 years and have not edited or will not edit taking any amount from anyone. I haven't done that. I am a millionare and editing wiki is my passion and I love to continue to make wikipedia wonderful as it is. I don't know what is the exact reason for my block. From my understanding of the block message its based of COI , As mentioned earlier I have not edited any page in return of money. One user mentioned in my talk page about an account Vijay Pravin Maharajan which I created seems COI, I have consulted admin Jimfleak through my talk page before creating that page. It can be seen in my talk history. Recently I created a page for Abhilash Pillai , a script writer and some user mentioned the one who added photo is also blocked. Abhilash is quite famous in kerala now for being the writer of the highest grossing malayalam movie in 2022. I have many other concerns regarding few editors and one admin which I can raise later. I have been recreating deleted pages solving the problems it had and adding more info into it. I regret if that is the problem or anything else from my end which caused trouble in wiki. I can assure that I will abide with wikipedia rules and guidelines in future . If there is any additional details needed, I am all here to provide. Thank you Jehowahyereh (talk) 04:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. UtherSRG (talk) 11:42, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Aswin Jose

The article Aswin Jose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

actor with numerous minor mentions. Fails GNG, BIO and NACTOR. A WP:BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Monhiroe (talk) 08:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diesel (2022 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diesel (2022 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diesel (2022 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Monhiroe (talk) 09:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diesel (2022 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Diesel (2022 film), is not suitable as written to remain published per the AfD. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star Mississippi 14:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abhilash Pillai (film writer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhilash Pillai (film writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhilash Pillai (film writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 00:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Diesel (2022 film)

Hello, Jehowahyereh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Diesel (2022 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vijay Pravin Maharajan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijay Pravin Maharajan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Pravin Maharajan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Akshithmanya ^talk 11:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deepak Menon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepak Menon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Menon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Akshithmanya ^talk 11:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natalie Plain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natalie Plain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Plain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Akshithmanya ^talk 15:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]