User talk:Jdclark78757

Welcome!

Hello, Jdclark78757, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Philosopher's rock, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 00:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Philosopher's rock

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Philosopher's rock, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.capitalareastatues.com/philosopher.html. As a copyright violation, Philosopher's rock appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Philosopher's rock has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Philosopher's rock and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Philosopher's rock with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Philosopher's rock.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 00:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elisabeth earle

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Elisabeth earle, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://64.202.170.125/elisabeth/about_elisabeth.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Elisabeth earle

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Elisabeth earle, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://64.202.170.125/elisabeth/about_elisabeth.html. As a copyright violation, Elisabeth earle appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Elisabeth earle has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Elisabeth earle and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Elisabeth earle with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Elisabeth earle.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Elisabeth earle, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]