User talk:Jason C.K.

*NOTICE FROM JASON C.K.*

I read a lot of articles, but other than that do not spend over-much time at Wikipedia doing other things, editing, engaging in discussion, etc. Unless you're posting on my talk page regarding something I'm currently active in, I might never notice :P If you're not sure I'm currently active on the wiki, you're better off emailing me (maybe I'll see your email amidst all my spam) AND posting on my talk page. --Jason C.K. 18:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Failed cat

Uhhh, where was the discussion on this? I notice you're moding a number of articles I was prime on, but no one ever asked me my opinion on this matter! Maury 16:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• I'll respond on the category's talk page

--Jason C.K. 16:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

iTablet

Although I am not trying to take offense at my page being deleted, I still would aprreciate if you did not. It spent hours compiling the research for this and also, if I recall correctly, there was a page on Intel powered Macs before Steve Jobs even hinted at that possibility. Please do not think I am mad. I understand that some articles need to be deleted. If you are Apple User, you must know that there has to be a Tablet in development. Even with the iPhone, patents have been taken out on a touchscreen computer with Apple software. Like I stated in the article, "With more and more architects, engineers, and designers (as well as Law Enforcement and Medics) turning to tablets for everyday use, Apple has definitely seen the potential of a Tablet PC." It will happen, it doesn't matter what steve Jobs says. But thank you. Also, i would be very delighted to start the Modbooks article, if you cold help that would be great.

• I replied on the iTablet talk page.

--Jason C.K. 22:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Broken OS template

I'm the person that came looking for help...but coelacan never came back :( Can you answer my question? I still can't use the template. I'm still confused how to use the code shown on that page, and I find no explanation or examples anywhere (I'm noticing Wikipedia is a little light on examples, I wish it had more, it's a lot more clear & concise than lots of help text). When I paste in, exactly, "Mets501" (without the quotes) it clearly isn't working right. Am I supposed to write something in place of "PAGENAME"? --Jason C.K. 19:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, I see the problem. The page had the wrong text. See the category page now. —Mets501 (talk) 22:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

iTablet

LOOK HERE AND TELL ME THERE WILL NOT BE A TABLET YOU IGNORANT FOOL!!!!!!!!!!

Jason C.K.

In one of your many comments, you said that tablets were a niche market. Well guess what Einstien, so were MP3 players! And now look!! Apple can make the products better. The Apple name and the huge Cult of Mac will create immense demand alone. Plus, Apple's 200+ patents on the touchscreen and gesture recognition are not going to be just for a cell phone. I use a Mac and I dont think that Apple would miss a chance to enter another market with that is currently a horrible mess, with miserable products and no clear market leader. Just like they did with iPod.

Accusations of bad faith.

On the Talk:Criticism_of_Microsoft#This_article_consists_heavily_of_Original_Research page you repeatedly accuse me of attempting to delete the article and then you accuse of me bad faith edits. I do not appreciate such accusations. You can't just claim bad faith when anyone disagrees with you. Please see WP:AGF. --TrollHistorian 02:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

• I believe I accuse you once of attempting to take apart the article by any means possible (because you keep offering changing arguments and only sometimes try to support/defend your reasoning, and only sometimes respond to the counter-points others make), and another time of giving the appearance of not discussing in good faith because you make a statement which appears to me to be insupportable (i.e.--that the article is ALL primary sources, and mis-used ones at that), I repeatedly ask you about your statement, and you just ignore my question. You're also unwilling to answer simple yes/no questions. Ok, so bad faith isn't the right term here, but you're not looking entirely to me like someone who's listening to others and responding, which rather grinds any discussion to a halt. I have been attempting to understand you, and indeed am about the only person even joining you in the discussion, but your ignoring counter-points isn't really helping. I apologized for saying you were trying to take apart the article by any means possible, but still you seem to ignore counter-points by others. That pattern doesn't give me the impression of someone who fully supports a give-and-take discussion. So no, that's not bad faith, but I don't think it's fair or productive discussion practice.

--Jason C.K. 03:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

electronic voting

hi Jason,

please have a look at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Electronic_voting#Jason_C.K._edits_.26_update

and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_voting&diff=189735717&oldid=prev

You need to invest quite some time to have lasting edits against e-voting ;) --Taintain (talk) 23:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Apple newton messagepad mixed note jk.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Apple newton messagepad mixed note jk.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 17:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Warhawk wiki

PLEASE contact me on the warhawk wiki!!! 24.118.220.174 (talk) 00:12, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Third-person PlayStation 3 shooter?

Hi Jason C.K.,

Thanks for your recent edits on the category of PlayStation 3 third-person shooters. One question: isn't the naming wrong right now? Shouldn't it be "PlayStation 3 third-person shooter" and not "Third-person PlayStation 3 shooter"? Otherwise the genre itself, third-person shooter, is split. --Soetermans. T / C 12:51, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

• Yep, your suggestion makes sense. I see it also matches to similar type categories created for various Nintendo consoles. If you like it better with your name suggestion, I certainly have no qualms if you want to change it. --Jason C.K. (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jason, sorry I didn't notice your reply before. Don't get me wrong, I have no intention of changing them, I just noticed your edits. I stay away as far as I can from categories! --Soetermans. T / C 11:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

• Maybe I'll change it someday. I made another category, but was careful to take your suggestion into account, and called it "OS X MMORPGs"  :) --Jason C.K. (talk) 16:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jason C.K.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jason C.K.. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jason C.K.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:MacOS massively multiplayer online role-playing games has been nominated for deletion

Category:MacOS massively multiplayer online role-playing games has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. IceWelder [✉] 10:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Apple newton messagepad checklist jk.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Apple newton messagepad checklist jk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)