User talk:Janaofmm

Speedy deletion of Rosemary ellen guiley

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld 13:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:REGBoltSmall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:REGBoltSmall.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 21:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rosemary Ellen Guiley

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. -- Vary | Talk 13:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Vary | Talk 02:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there is information in the current version of the article that's incorrect, please feel free to remove it (although as far as I can tell the International Institute for Integral Human Sciences is not an accredited university). The problem here is that your version of the article was edited for tone and format over several revisions, and rather than working from that revision and making whatever corrections you feel are necessary, you've repeatedly reverted to your preferred version and then made those changes and updates, which to experienced editors can look like an attempt to control (or 'own') the content of the page. So please work on improving the current version rather than reverting the constructive changes made by other editors. Please be very careful about keeping your tone neutral, and be prepared to have other editors change and remove text that may not be entirely neutral, and even add sourced information that you may feel is negative. If you haven't already, now would also be a good time to review our guidelines on conflicts of interest. And please try to assume good faith; there's no reason to believe that there's anyone editing the article who has a personal problem with your client. -- Vary Talk 15:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Janaofmm! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Rosemary Ellen Guiley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:09, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]