User talk:Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco/Archives/2020

Speedy deletion nomination of Gerard Mussies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gerard Mussies, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 07:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

I think the nomination was too fast, knowing that it appears in university libraries, google scholar, jstor, etc. This version of the article is different from the previous one. Anyway, I really appreciate your recommendations and time. Best regards. --Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited François Bœspflug, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Gérard Gertoux for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gérard Gertoux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gérard Gertoux (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 21:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

I thank you very much for the advice, and I hope that with this, the wikipedia policies will be fulfilled.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 22:32, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

• There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Guy (help!) 23:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for this other notice. Have a good time.Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 23:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco,

Please do not make any further posts to the deletion discussion of Gérard Gertoux. Your edits are becoming disruptive. Please do not bludgeon the process. Further responses to everyone weighing in on the discussion are not necessary and are discouraging to those editors who would like to participate. You do not get to badger each editor with questions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Ok, it is ordered now. Have a good day.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 00:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Gérard Mussies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gérard Mussies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gérard Mussies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 12:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice, I'll keep that in mind.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

WHY???

Why don't you stop pestering wikipedia with your sloppy nonsense? --Qumranhöhle (talk) 22:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

don't you understand the difference between a journal article and a book? --Qumranhöhle (talk) 15:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

I've explained it several times to you. If you don't understand, I don't care, but that doesn't make your sloppy edits any better. --Qumranhöhle (talk) 22:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Should have known that it is useless to explain anything to you. You don't want to understand, you just want to push your POV. --Qumranhöhle (talk) 22:52, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nehemia Gordon

The article Nehemia Gordon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no citations, doesn't meet notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Makaristos (talk) 06:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. I'll see if I can do something to improve the article.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nehemia Gordon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nehemia Gordon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nehemia Gordon. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Guy (help!) 17:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank for the notice user:JzG (Guy). Have a good day.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Charles Perrot moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charles Perrot, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning. May you succeed with your editions.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 04:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Jean Margain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jean Margain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

I appreciate your cooperation. Have a nice day.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 19:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Margain has been accepted

Jean Margain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on this article and on wikipedia. May all be well with you.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 12:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Charles Perrot has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Charles Perrot. Thanks! Awsomaw (talk) 16:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Dear Awsomaw, I tried to improve the article by adding references. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at it.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 22:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Perrot has been accepted

Charles Perrot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Awsomaw (talk) 23:11, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much, and I always appreciate any suggestions. --Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 23:15, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

No problem! I changed "biblicist" to "biblical scholar" because that's what you're looking for. "Biblicist" in English has a different meaning. In addition, this sentence, "Perrot collaborated in the Association catholique française pour l'étude de la Bible. Congrès (1979 Paris, France) Etudes sur la première lettre de Pierre." has way too much French in it. Can you trim it down? And if only there was an English Wikipedia page for the ACFEB... In addition, can you add an ISBN, ASIN, or citation for the rest of his works? Those would be the main things to improve on the article as of right now. Thanks, Awsomaw (talk) 23:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco

Thank you for creating Anne Pasquier.

User:Synoman Barris, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Meets WP:ACADEMIC, good job

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Synoman Barris}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

I really appreciate your support and advice. All be fine with you.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Article for Deletion: Alexander Thomson (writer)

Hi, since you have contributed to this article, I wanted to let you know that I've submitted it to AfD, in case you wanted to participate in the discussion. Alan Islas (talk) 17:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)