User talk:Jacobayoub

Ref says 9

https://www.health.gov.au/news/coronavirus-update-at-a-glance

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this reference is outdated. It has been updated by others about 2 hours ago.

Government news stations confirmed it called ABC News Australia Jacobayoub (talk) 04:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LEAVE THE REFERENCES! I’m adding new ones and they are REILABLE and you are changing it. Jacobayoub (talk) 05:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have added no references... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Jacobayoub (talk) 05:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, for some odd reason I’ve been blocked from editing. All the information has been reliable. What has happened? Jacobayoub (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you continue to add numbers not reflected in the source? El_C 06:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have supplied the source from BNO News. Are you incharge of blocking? Jacobayoub (talk) 06:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BNO News is where I’m getting the info from. It was attached to the China source, but was since removed by a user. Jacobayoub (talk) 06:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:INDENT. Anyway, the numbers need to be reflected in the source that is actually being cited at any given time. And, as already mentioned, I am the one who protected the template. El_C 06:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t notice that the source was removed so I just updated the number which was shown on the website.

I’ll be able to update the source now if I’m able to please.

Thanks. Jacobayoub (talk) 06:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please allow me to edit? Thank you. Jacobayoub (talk) 06:26, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please review WP:INDENT. As for your request, I would rather you make proposals on the template talk page, for now. Protection, incidentally, is applied to pages. Blocks are applied to users. You are not blocked. El_C 06:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m on mobile device Jacobayoub (talk) 06:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can supply edits since I live in Australia so I can do them when I’m awake. Jacobayoub (talk) 06:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I see the connection between what device you're on to what I said above. And yet again you fail to indent. Anyway, supply those figures to the template talk page as proposed edits is what I was saying. El_C 06:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t see what you mean by indent. Also, how are others editing the page? I would like to be able to edit it since there are information to be updated. Jacobayoub (talk) 08:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When can I have access to the page please? Jacobayoub (talk) 08:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All the information I supplied was correct. Jacobayoub (talk) 08:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Doc James. I woke up this morning and I just found out that I’ve been blocked for using ‘multiple accounts’. What does that mean? I didn’t do anything.. could you please unblock me?? My whole IP is blocked.

I can’t edit on any Wikipedia page....

Errr. I’m so frustrated...

Please and thank you. I just want to edit and help Wikipedia. Could you please help? Jacobayoub (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This isn’t a unblock discussion. This was about a source Jacobayoub (talk) 04:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can remove anything you wish except for answered unblock requests. El_C 04:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I am unblock am I able to delete it? Jacobayoub (talk) 04:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Affirmative. El_C 04:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick reply? Are you able to review my unblock request? Please and thank you. Jacobayoub (talk) 04:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot. In your case, only an admin with the checkuser permission may do so. El_C 04:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. So I’ll hear from them in the next few hours? Jacobayoub (talk) 04:46, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. I cannot provide a time for you. El_C 04:50, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I appreciate your support. Jacobayoub (talk) 04:50, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. El_C 04:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Jacobayoub. Edible Melon (talk · contribs · block user) 10:55, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacobayoub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not using multiple accounts, I don’t know what that means. I only use my iPhone. I want to help Wikipedia by editing many articles for the community. This ban was a mistake in your side.Jacobayoub (talk) 23:48, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppeteer. Also, why would we unblock someone who's only here to post nonsensical edits to their user page? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:47, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok look, I have a younger sibling who is very young. He likes to play around with things and yesterday he admitted that he was trying to raise the edit counter up to see how much he could get. I told him that I change the password and he has no longer access to my account, I take full responsibility to this action.

When you mentioned ‘multiple accounts’ I didn’t know what that meant, so I got a little confused. I didn’t use multiple accounts, instead my little brother was bored and wanted to play around. Jacobayoub (talk) 01:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, WP:LITTLEBROTHER is usually not an argument we accept as valid. El_C 01:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise in advance about what has occurred and I’ll make sure this doesn’t happen again. My intended was not for this to happen. I love these kinds of things and I visit Wikipedia everyday. I’ve had experience managing things on social media and I’m a truthworthy person.

I kindly request for you to unblock me as this was an error that won’t happen again.

As I said before, my intention on here (Wikipedia) is to improve the experience for millions of people worldwide. I like to offer my time to help others.

Thank you Jacobayoub (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacobayoub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have a younger sibling who is very young. He likes to play around with things and yesterday he admitted that he was trying to raise the edit counter up to see how much he could get. I told him that I change the password and he has no longer access to my account, I take full responsibility to this action. When you mentioned ‘multiple accounts’ I didn’t know what that meant, so I got a little confused. I didn’t use multiple accounts, instead my little brother was bored and wanted to play around.

I apologise in advance about what has occurred and I’ll make sure this doesn’t happen again. My intended was not for this to happen. I love these kinds of things and I visit Wikipedia everyday. I’ve had experience managing things on social media and I’m a truthworthy person. I kindly request for you to unblock me as this was an error that won’t happen again. As I said before, my intention on here (Wikipedia) is to improve the experience for millions of people worldwide. I like to offer my time to help others.

Thanks, I hope you understand. Enjoy your day. Jacobayoub (talk) 04:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted above, WP:BROTHER is not usually an argument that is accepted as valid. We have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer/holding the phone making edits, only that inappropriate edits came from this account(and others, it seems). For all I know, you are the younger sibling claiming to be you. For this reason, compromised accounts are not unblocked. There might be a way for you to follow the guidance at WP:COMPROMISED to be able to resume editing, but you will need to describe what edits you want to make and what steps you will take to better secure your account, in order to resolve this checkuser issue first. 331dot (talk) 10:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hey, did you read my latest unblock request. Thank you. Jacobayoub (talk) 22:38, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacobayoub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, I take 100% responsibility to what has occurred. I promise this won’t happen again. I have taken further steps to ensure that this won’t happen again. I have: • Changed my Wikipedia password • Added a passcode on my phone These steps above will protect my account from getting unwanted spam. I have edited many articles in the past including from weeks and months ago. My goal is to continue that for the community. I love Wikipedia and I enjoy what I do. I hope I can continue doing good for the community and to get back editing. I can’t wait to get back on this wonderful site and start editing again. I politely request for you to unblock me from Wikipedia due to the fact that I have taken further steps to ensure these things won’t occur again. I take full responsibility. I know that wasn’t a good look for me on Wikipedia because it was against the terms of service. But, I have reviewed the terms of service and I have ensured that I have fixed the issue that occurred earlier, and promise this won’t occur again. I understand the consequences that occur when you don’t follow the correct terms of service on this website. I hope I can come back editing. Thanks for reading down this far. I hope you understand what I’m coming from. My trust and politeness will continue to thrive on this platform. Thanks again, cheers! Jacobayoub (talk) 03:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have neglected again to cover why you are blocked, and that is the fact you were caught socking with multiple accounts. At this point, any other unblock request would be a waste of your time, and ours, so I am also removing talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When do I get a response please? Jacobayoub (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]