User talk:Jackspinner
Welcome!
Hello, Jackspinner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 22:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't feel deleting references to the individuals who initiated the actions on 9-11 is the proper move. This isn't a natural disaster, the planes didn't "explode" of their own voilition (not to mention it's terrible grammar). 19 individuals initiated these actions.
--Mmx1 20:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
World Trade Center
[edit]World Trade Center isn't the main article for discussing the 9/11 attacks, yet alone such conspiracies which I don't think have a place in Wikipedia except for the 9/11 conspiracy theories article. Also, let this be a warning, regarding WP:3RR. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 16:45, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- The World Trade Center article merely says "...all of the original buildings in the complex were destroyed in the September 11, 2001 attacks" and leaves the specifics about both the attacks and the building collapses to separate articles. Specifics about the collapse of the twin towers are detailed in Collapse of the World Trade Center, and there is a separate article that covers specifics about WTC7. As for Silverstein's quote, "pull-it", that is covered in the 9/11 conspiracy theories article. Regarding WP:3RR, Wikipedia doesn't allow editors to revert more than three times in 24 hours. So, should you try to put your statements in the WTC article once more, your at risk for being blocked. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 17:28, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Also you are very unintelligent and like to meddle into other peoples articles and ruin them by just deleting what they have written and then comment with the one word you know 'fatuous'. Stop deleting my articles i didn't state anything incorrect and am not interested in what you have to say - You ARE NOT IMPORTANT. -EddyJawed —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 11:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Google.com
[edit]Make a friend in google.com and you wouldn't have to ask.[1][2] - Deathrocker 16:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello Jackspinner! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Maurits Jonkman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)