Jump to content

User talk:J hernan26

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, J hernan26! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Aboutmovies (talk) 05:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Stop by the Teahouse anytime!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! J hernan26, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! SarahStierch (talk) 20:40, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response to one of your comments

[edit]

Unfortunately, I'm about to leave for Chile for a week, so I won't be able to review your proposal. If you want to move ahead with the article, I do have one suggestion: If you name it College women in science and engineering instead of Lack of college women in science and engineering it will have a much better chance of not being deleted. It can still have the same content, and focus on the lack of women, but that will give it a broader sounding and more neutral title. Otherwise, given my experience with similar articles, I would say it is likely to be nominated for deletion. Kaldari (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that article titles use sentence case rather than title case (strange, I know). Kaldari (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Women in engineering

[edit]

Nice work on the Women in engineering article! Kaldari (talk) 18:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to you comments at Talk:Women in engineering#A couple suggestions. Cheers! Kaldari (talk) 23:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Women in engineering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Stress, Media, Dropout, Peer, Coping, Survey, Administrator, Breadwinner and Counselor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits from Lenasilva

[edit]

Hey Juan! Great topic! I think the article is very well organized and I like the title that you ended up choosing, I agree that it is much more neutral.

I think the last sentence of the first paragraph could be edited to be a little more succinct: These explanations vary from beliefs regarding women's physiological inability to succeed as engineers, to environmental factors in women's childhoods that discourage them from entering science and engineering fields.[1][2] Of course, I'm not sure what your source information says, so feel free to disregard this suggestion if it does not coincide.

The last section of the first paragraph is currently: Two forms of activism tasked with raising awareness include both on and off-campus organizations. I think it would be more efficacious if it read: Two forms of activism tasked with raising awareness include organizations focused on college campuses and organizations that are geared toward the society at large. ...or some version of this - I just think "on and off-campus organizations" is too jargon-y for non-students.

I think there is a typo in the last sentence of the last section on Initiatives: Additionally, ethnic diversity is a factor that has been strongly suggested admissions boards prioritize.[19][21] --> it could be: Additionally, it has been strongly suggested that admissions boards prioritize ethnic diversity.[19][21] Also, in this section, you use the acronym "STEM" without clarifying what it stands for, maybe you spelled it out earlier and I missed it? If not, then it may be good to spell it out and then put STEM in parenthesis next to it.

I really like the organization and flow of the article. I think it makes a lot of sense and is easy to follow. I especially appreciated that you included a list of notable women engineers. Great job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lenasilva (talk • contribs) 20:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lenasilva (talk) 20:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response

[edit]

Thanks, Lena. I'll use all the help I can get right now, and it certainly wasn't an easy choice for me to change the title of piece. I really wanted to include more information on foreign women engineers to make the article more complete, but I guess I'll have to settle for everything as is due to time constraints. I'll be sure to follow the two suggestions you outlined above, especially concerning the very last sentence in my introduction. I dunno, I seriously thought I had fixed that piece since I had full intention to expand it when I had originally written it. And yes, I'll be sure to fix that sentence regarding ethnic diversity, too. Regarding the STEM acronym, I actually defined it in the History section of my article. I figured that once was enough. Nevertheless, thank you for the great suggestions and I wish you the best of luck on your article as well.

J hernan26 (talk) 21:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)J hernan26[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Diversity in the classroom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Public school, Segregate, Freedom, Minority, Native American and European
Women in engineering in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Stress, Promotion and Caring
Child laundering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Western and Profit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Women_in_engineering_in_the_United_States&oldid=480206321 Kaldari (talk) 21:34, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Education Program Student Survey

[edit]

Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/College Women in Science and Engineering concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/College Women in Science and Engineering, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Underrepresentation of College Women in Science and Engineering concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Underrepresentation of College Women in Science and Engineering, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission College Women in Science and Engineering

[edit]

Hello J hernan26. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled College Women in Science and Engineering.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/College Women in Science and Engineering}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission The Underrepresentation of College Women in Science and Engineering

[edit]

Hello J hernan26. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Underrepresentation of College Women in Science and Engineering.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Underrepresentation of College Women in Science and Engineering}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon

[edit]
Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - You are invited!
Hi J hernan26! The first Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 in Austin

Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Wikipedians of all experience levels are invited! Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors.
Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here!

An invitation to join WikiProject Women writers

[edit]

Hello J hernan26! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women writers, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women writers on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)

[edit]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:J_hernan26&oldid=1063838594"