Jump to content

User talk:J Milburn/archive47

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Proposed deletion of Projekt: The New Face of Goth

Notice

The article Projekt: The New Face of Goth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable compilation. No coverage in reliable sources failing WP:N & WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:26, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

73 Cows DYK

Hello! Your submission of 73 Cows at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019 at Women in Red

February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111


Happy February from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons.

February events: Social Workers Black Women

February geofocus: Ancient World

Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman2019

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe

Join the conversations on our talkpage:


Image attribution: Johntex (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Tunnel problem. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

@Jmertel23: Do you really think that this was an appropriate message to leave? Josh Milburn (talk) 07:26, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

Administrator changes

added Enterprisey • JJMC89
readded BorgQueen
removed Harro5 • Jenks24 • Graft • R. Baley

Interface administrator changes

removedEnterprisey

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Help with FAC

Hello again! I hope you are doing well and having a good end of your week. I was wondering if you had the time to do a source review for my current FAC? Apologies for the random message, and I understand if you would prefer not to do so. Have a great rest of your day/night. Aoba47 (talk) 19:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

@Aoba47: I had seen it, but I'm sadly completely swamped right now. I doubt I'll be able to get to it in time, but I will if I can! Josh Milburn (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

File:73 Cows.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 73 Cows

On 14 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 73 Cows, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the BAFTA-winning documentary 73 Cows tells the story of Jay and Katja Wilde, beef farmers who gave most of their cows to the Hillside Animal Sanctuary and took up vegan organic farming? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/73 Cows. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 73 Cows), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 00:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

A Quick Thank You

Hi Josh. I just want to say a quick thank you for reviewing the Smythe's Megalith article. Hope that you found it of some interest. I'm thinking of taking it to FAC in the near future as I don't think that there's a great deal more that can be done with it. Have a good week! Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019 at Women in Red

March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113


Happy Women's History Month from Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:
March: Art+Feminism & #VisibleWikiWomen
Geofocus: Francophone Women
Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman


Other ways you can participate:
Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe
Join the conversations on our talkpage
Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred
Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Simoom (P225)

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

@Yoninah: Thanks for the note. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:00, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • United States L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
  • Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
  • Denmark MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
  • United States Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
  • Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
  • Ohio Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

UCLA Philosophy

Dear Josh! Can you please examine this merge? I think it can have independent article. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 09:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

@Pirhayati: If you disagree with the merger, I think it's reasonable to ask for some discussion. Perhaps we could ask the other editors involved to hold off restoring the redirect while discussion is ongoing, in line with the "BRD" cycle - though it would be good if you joined the discussion on the talk page rather than simply reverting. If you're asking me if I think the department deserves an article, I'm less sure. There probably could be a separate article, but the one that was there wasn't that good (as is mentioned on the talk page). Josh Milburn (talk) 20:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen: Thanks! I confess my-very-much-amateur interest in mycology doesn't really extend to obscure yeasts, but I do what I can! (PS: I choose to believe that's a vegan Dobos torte; I'm sure someone will have made one...) Josh Milburn (talk) 20:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Speaking of yeasts! I could give you a loaf of bread.... 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

April editathons at Women in Red

April 2019

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117


Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Candida blankii

I am within 300 characters of reaching the 1500 minimum, so that I could submit this for a WP:DYK. I am running out of ideas. It is easily past the 5X expansion, and we are within the time limit. If you can find something to add, I would be happy to add you as a co-contributor. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen: The original description (can you access it?) has physical characteristics. That is the obvious absence, here! I'll take a quick look this evening. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I am within 100 characters over 1,500, so this should require only a mild touchup. I particularly like taking an AFD to a DYK. I am naturally resistant and perverse that way. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen (☎)
Any suggestions for a WP:DYK hook? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen: I'd go for something about human infection. Something like: ...that though first described from mink organs, the yeast Candida blankii' is now known to infect humans? Josh Milburn (talk) 10:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Although I should say that the article is maybe a little all over the place at the moment - I think that's probably unsurprising, given that it was put together quickly by non-specialists. Perhaps we could try to put it in "order" a little... Something like:
Taxobox
Lead
-Taxonomy
-Description
-Biology
--Symbiosis
--Pathology
---Human pathology
-References
-External links
I think GAC would be very optimistic, but hopefully we can get it to a nice self-contained B-class before it hits the MP? Josh Milburn (talk) 10:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll nominate it. Will list you as a co-creator.
A collaborator would be most welcome. For sure, I was working outside my bailiwick. It was written to defeat the delete; that whole kerfuffle started because one editor got irritated and retaliatory when I undid his deletion of a link to the article. A silly reason to start an AFD.
I would welcome any rewrite or clean up you might do. Any article can be improved, and this one needs another set of eyes. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Getting TO WP:GA will take some work. OTOH, WP:Deletion to Quality Award is an incentive. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:06, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen: I've moved things around a little so that it's a bit more standardised. The article's certainly not looking terrible, but I'm a little nervous that two non-specialists have pulled together disparate comments from such a wide range of journals - the article feels a little bitty, and I worry we may have gotten some things wrong. 17:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Suggesting my essay for Signpost?

Hello, I am wondering if you could suggest my essay Wikipedia:Notability comparison test for inclusion in the April edition of Signpost. Of course, I can make the suggestion myself, but given that I am the author of the essay, it would seem like self-promotion to others. VarunSoon (talk) 06:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

@VarunSoon: I'm afraid I must decline. I'm not interested in being involved with The Signpost at the moment; I've been watching recent developments with some horror. I'm also not sure how familiar the majority of Signpost readers will be with the kind of logical arguments you're deploying in the piece; it may get a rather frosty reception for that reason. Josh Milburn (talk) 11:10, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Candida blankii

Hello! Your submission of Candida blankii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:06, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Faryl Smith scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Faryl Smith has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 14 May 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 14, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 21:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Cortinarius violaceus scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Cortinarius violaceus has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 22 May 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 22, 2019. Thanks! 22:38, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Ealdgyth - Talk

Sorry for the double scheduled, but at least this is a co-nom, and let's face it, fungi don't exactly attract a lot of controversy...
Precious
Six years!
Good timing it seems! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ealdgyth and Gerda Arendt: Wow, thanks! The Smith article was in decent enough shape last time I looked, and fungi articles don't tend to need updating too much. I'll have a look through both of them. Josh Milburn (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Candida blankii

On 24 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Candida blankii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the yeast Candida blankii, first described from mink organs, is now known to infect humans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Candida blankii. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Candida blankii), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!

May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121


Hello and welcome to the May events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Edit warring?

Please read the article about edit warring. I reverted your edit once only. Just because you weren't able to see the error doesn't mean I was wrong. Sebastian James (talk) 18:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

@Sebastian James: No one has claimed that my inability to see the "error" meant that you were wrong. I am perfectly aware of what WP:EDITWAR says. Indeed, I know that it is not an article. Perhaps you could "use your brain and look" before claiming it is in the future? Josh Milburn (talk) 18:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Your actions say otherwise. We didn't "repeatedly override each other's contributions", maybe you can be "perfectly aware" after you read it (again) in the future? So sad, unable to look at the edit before reverting, now other editors should be extremely accurate when messaging you because of your attitude. Duly noted! Sebastian James (talk) 19:00, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
  • Wales Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
  • Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
  • Kingdom of Prussia Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by Chicago Barkeep49 with six GAs, United States Ceranthor, England Lee Vilenski, and Saskatchewan Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and Denmark MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
 Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Bhagat Singh/archive1

Hello there, Josh. How are things going with you? Good I hope. I've nominated this film article about the life of the Indian freedom fighter Bhagat Singh starring Ajay Devgn as the titular character. As always, your comments would be most welcome and beneficial to the overall improvement of the article. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Thanks for the note; I can't make any promises, I'm afraid. Best of luck with the nomination. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:07, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration

  • In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
  • Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

MAX Red Line FA nomination

Hi Josh! I was wondering if you could assist me with getting the MAX Red Line article reviewed for potential featured article. It seems my decision to bypass a recommended step has not helped me in getting the article looked at, therefore I am reaching out. I hope you could take a look at it and provide feedback whenever time permits. I look forward to hearing from you. --Truflip99 (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

@Truflip99: Thanks for the message. Subjectwise, it's not really my bag, I'm afraid. I'm trying to up my reviewing, though, so I may be able to drop by. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for considering it (and the very swift response). Very much looking forward to it! :) --Truflip99 (talk) 20:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you today for Faryl Smith, "a child singer of Britain's Got Talent fame, after Andrew Johnston and Connie Talbot. Smith has arguably been more successful than either of them- Talbot saw fame in the US and the far east, and Johnston has vanished, but Smith is still a fairly big name in the UK classical scene, despite her second album failing somewhat." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:49, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Faryl Smith

Template:Faryl Smith has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 13:36, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Caroline Brady (philologist)

Thanks again for the review of this article, Josh. I'm sorry it got somewhat subsumed by a minor point at the end, but happily that discussion has come to a rest. As you say, good working with you again; by now I've come to expect a number of your points (e.g., logical quotation and, for academics, substance and impact of publications) which I try to incorporate in articles whether or not you are reviewing them. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:11, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

TFA

Thany today for Cortinarius violaceus! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Many thanks. Faryl Smith's time on the main page was tough (the article hadn't aged as well as I thought, given the now extreme hostility to one of the sources that was used!) but hopefully a purple mushroom won't cause too much trouble! Josh Milburn (talk) 08:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Good luck today. I watch every TFA, but will be mostly off today. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: Just a couple of unhelpful changes so far, but surely forgivable! Josh Milburn (talk) 09:14, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

June events with WIR

June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125


Check out what's happening in June at Women in Red:

Virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series

Template:Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 11:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

Administrator changes

removed Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický

CheckUser changes

removed Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
  • An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
  • An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news

  • The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
  • Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

July events from Women in Red!

July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128


Check out what's happening in July at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Initiatives we support:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

Administrator changes

removed 28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • Floquenbeam1 • Flyguy649 • Fram2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • Norfolk Island Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
  • South Carolina Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
  • United States Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

I owe you a pint

Hi, I just noticed on your userpage that you live in York, and are a lecturer at York uni - funnily enough, so do I, and my partner's in the History department. I always teach my kids not to arrange to meet people over the internet, but I don't necessarily practise what I preach - if you fancy a pint in the Phoenix or the Lamb and Lion some point, I'd be very glad to thank you for all the effort you've put into that recent GA review. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 18:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

@Girth Summit: Thanks! I saw you were York-based - small world! I hardly keep it a secret who I am and I've met up with Wikipedians several times... Nothing's gone wrong yet! I've actually only met a couple people from the history department, though I have taught a good few History/Politics joint honours students. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:51, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
She's Laura Stewart - Early Modern British History? I'd suggest all going for a drink together, but she's out at the Huntingdon Library for the summer doing some research (which is why I've got more time than usual for writing articles!). If you've got a free evening some time, it would be nice to meet another Wikipedian - I'm quite jealous seeing all the meetups they have in London, Oxford and Cambridge... GirthSummit (blether) 20:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for doing that GAN on Fir Clump, Josh! Hope you found it interesting. I intend to pull some of the other Wiltshire stone circle articles up to scratch in the new few years, although I have less time for Wikipedia now than I used to so it might be a slow process. Midnightblueowl (talk) 09:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

@Midnightblueowl: My pleasure. I, too, have much less time for Wikipedia than I have done in the past, though a forthcoming new job, house move, etc. may mean that my life looks very different in six months than it does right now. I'll keep my eyes open for any GA nominations. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
All the best with the move and the new job! Midnightblueowl (talk) 09:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019 at Women in Red

August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131


Check out what's happening in August at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 06:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

FA mentor Digital media use and mental health

Hi there how are you? I have worked quite a bit on this article over the last 7 or so months, and brought it to GA status. I was wondering if you were interested in mentoring me to bring it to FA status. It has a peer review (still open, I'm not sure when to close it), also just underwent copyediting. Thanks so much for considering! --[E.3][chat2][me] 04:36, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

@E.3: Thanks for the message. It's a really important topic, but I may be a little slow as I have just agreed to mentor for a different article. I wonder if you have asked Casliber? This may be a topic he'd be willing to help out with. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:42, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
I have been involved already and will take another look Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi!

Hello! I've noticed your username in the list of FAC mentors. I'm currently writing an article draft about Indonesian homegardens, and I'm aiming a featured-article criteria for it. However, I'm afraid that the writing might be inadequate in its flow or readability, and I'm also afraid that I might accidentally came into indications of original research. If you have time, any revision or any form of constructive criticism will be appreciated. Thank you in advance! Dhio-270599 15:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

@Dhio270599: How fascinating; I'd be happy to help with this. A very quick glance suggests that the article is in a good shape, but I will find some time to take a good look at this soon. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Dhio-270599 12:52, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Pekarangan peer review

Hello! First of all, thank you for the corrections you have pointed out in the review page. If you have time, can you re-review the page? I'd be happy to know whether the article is assuredly adequate in its quality. Thank you! Dhio-270599 09:59, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 at Women in Red

September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135


Check out what's happening in September at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Indigenous cultural material...

I finally found one that has cultural material in spades.....King brown snake, though annoyingly there is no reference which summarises/encompasses it as a whole, leaving the cultural section a bit "bitty" currently. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@Casliber: Brilliant! I'll keep at eye out at GAC for it... Josh Milburn (talk) 14:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
readded Floquenbeam • Lectonar
removed DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana

CheckUser changes

removed Callanecc • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Note

Hello, J Milburn. In response to this, I have to note that you have misunderstood my comment. I was not suggesting that you immediately fail the article. I was suggesting that you fail the article if further discussion proved unproductive. You gave no time for such discussion, which might have resulted in further improvement to the article whether it was passed or not. If you do not wish to engage with me any further, that is of course your choice. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 23:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

@Freeknowledgecreator: I was happy to keep the review open and work through some of the disagreements we had. I think the reason I changed my mind will be fairly obvious to anyone who looks at the review. Trying to turn this around to make me out as unreasonable, impatient, or what-have-you is both unfair and patronising. Josh Milburn (talk) 06:56, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
We will have to agree to disagree. Your comments about the "reception" section were correct on one level (the section could indeed be better written, better organized and presented, and more interesting and engaging, than it is) and yet false on the level of detail. None of the specific suggestions you made for improving it were helpful. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 08:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
@Freeknowledgecreator: My incompetence knows no bounds. I don't think I have much more to say, but if you make any further comments, I will read them. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
I didn't call you incompetent. That would have been gratuitously insulting, and also quite wrong. You have written not only many more good articles than I have, but also featured articles, something I have not only never done but never expect to do. You are clearly a more skilled and more competent editor than I am. That is not flattery; it is just objective truth. However, I do have an advantage compared to you where Freud and Philosophy is concerned, which is that I've worked on it for many years, contributed essentially all of its content, and, I think I can reasonably say, have a familiarity with its sources that you do not. So when I tell you that your suggestions for improving the "Reception" section were not much good, I think my judgment is worth something, even if I'm not as good an editor as you in general.
I'm going to leave things here. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 10:39, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hello. I recently listed this article Felicity Smoak (Arrowverse) for peer review and was wondering if you would consider taking a look at it when you had chance? Any help and advice would be greatly appreciated. If it is not a topic you have an interest in/knowledge of, any general advice would still be extremely useful. Many thanks. AutumnKing (talk) 07:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

@Autumnking2012: Thanks for the note. It's not a topic I know anything about, but I may be able to find some time to drop by. No promises, though. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. Any advice is much appreciated. AutumnKing (talk) 08:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red

October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140


Check out what's happening in October at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Fire coral fungus

Yes probably. I can't find any other then Daily Mail news articles right now. Best off leaving my edit out until we find something more scholarly then.--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 12:05, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Good Article Backlog Drive Barnstar

The Working Man's Barnstar
Thanks for your participation in the September 2019 GA Backlog drive. Your 6 reviews made a difference, as did your willingness to review particularly old nominations. The work of editors like you helped bring down the unreviewed backlog by over 35%. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Илья Ильич Мечников

First of all, happy belated birthday! Secondly, I've replied to you. I didn't document it as well as I could have, because I thought the Creator page for Agence Rol explained it. It does not, so I fixed it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.2% of all FPs 08:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Four award

Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Meinhard Michael Moser. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019 at Women in Red

November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143


Check out what's happening in November at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:

  1. Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
  2. England Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points
  3. Norfolk Island Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
  4. Wales Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
  5. Washington (state) SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
  6. Antarctica Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points
  7. United States Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
  8. Indonesia HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Lethal Innocence

Hi Josh, Thanks for the review. Can you let me have publishing date/ISBN for Lethal Innocence? There are a couple of points I want to add, and can't find an online source for it. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 21:21, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

@SchroCat: I haven't looked at it; I just saw it cited in Scotland: Global Cinema: Genres, Modes and Identities. According to Google Books, it was published 1991, and the ISBN is 9780413649805. Might be a real pain to get hold of. Incidentally: I quoted the whole of the "Milestones" article that was about Whiskey Galore (I think), so I wouldn't expect too much from the article! Josh Milburn (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Excellent - thanks very much. - SchroCat (talk) 10:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

[[1]]

The contents listing includes in its lead section: "Wikipedia is a compendium of the world's knowledge... bird's eye view...", while the article about Wikipedia begins with "Wikipedia is a multilingual online encyclopedia created and maintained as...". This makes me feel like the lead section of Wikipedia:Contents exhibits some bias, but I'm not sure if I should do something about it, because it is, after all, Wikipedia's contents listing and not a fact-checked article. You're an experienced editor, so I thought it might be a good idea to consult you.

Please ignore my anonymity.

106.215.12.94 (talk) 13:06, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi there; I'm afraid I am not sure I understand your question. The contents page isn't a paradigm example of a page covered by the neutral point of view policy, but it probably is/should be covered. If you feel that the wording could be better, you could just boldly change it, or you could start a conversation at Wikipedia talk:Contents. Josh Milburn (talk) 14:35, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR

December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147


Check out what's happening in December at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

Administrator changes

added EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
removed Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂

CheckUser changes

readded Beeblebrox
removed Deskana

Interface administrator changes

readded Evad37

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/The Bill (Inside No. 9)/archive1

Reminder to self... Josh Milburn (talk) 08:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/The Riddle of the Sphinx (Inside No. 9)/archive1. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!


May 2020 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from Krampus!

All the best

Gavin / SchroCat (talk) 07:49, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

@SchroCat: Many thanks, and merry Christmas! Josh Milburn (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Io Saturnalia!

Io, Saturnalia!
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:31, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
@Ealdgyth: Many thanks, and merry Christmas! Josh Milburn (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
@Lightburst: Many thanks, and merry Christmas! Josh Milburn (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020 at Women in Red

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Be well at Christmas

Have a WikiChristmas and a PediaNewYear

Be well. Keep well. Have a lovely Christmas. SilkTork (talk) 18:27, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

@SilkTork: Merry Christmas! Love the bullfinch. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:J_Milburn/archive47&oldid=1259714503"