User talk:JWattsmorgan

Welcome!

Hello, JWattsmorgan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Luvsannamsrain Oyun-Erdene. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Shodes97 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shodes97. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JWattsmorgan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a sockpuppet account, account set up independently of Shodes97, edits made were different to those made previously by different users and used cited sources not used by previous usersJWattsmorgan (talk)

Decline reason:

The technical evidence apparently supports your claim that these accounts are different people.

However, the behavioral evidence strongly suggests off-wiki collusion to push this article in a certain direction. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, but the collaboration is supposed to take place out in the open, on Wikipedia, usually via the article's talk page.

It simply is not believeable that all these accounts simply sprung up one after another in rapid succession to edit the same single article in a similar manner. Wikipedia is especially mindful of such things when the target is a biography of a living person as it is in this case. You are free to appeal again, hopefully adressing the points I have raised. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 23:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.