User talk:JWBallz

Welcome!

Hello, JWBallz, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 22:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sam Hyde, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually,the link to the source was already there. I only provided clarification JWBallz (talk) 17:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You just removed my edit unfoundedly. JWBallz (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave my edits alone. JWBallz (talk) 17:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited and left a valid reason for the edit. The information removed is not substantiated and is misleading. JWBallz (talk) 17:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When your block expires, you can explain on the talk page how you feel the sources cited do not substantiate the information. —C.Fred (talk) 17:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're removing large quantities of well-sourced content without any appropriate justification or discussion. I've blocked you to stop the disruption. I will reduce the block to the article so that you may explain on the talkpage why you think such a drastic removal is appropriate. Acroterion (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A majority of the information I removed is unsubstantiated, anecdotal, or otherwise misleading. It most certainly does not belong in the main JWBallz (talk) 14:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 17:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Incel. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]