User talk:JSFarman/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:JSFarman. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019
Hello JSFarman,
- Backlog
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
- Coordinator
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
- This month's refresher course
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
- Deletion tags
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
- Paid editing
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
- Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
- Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
- Not English
- A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
- Tools
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Horton Barker
Thank you for the encouraging note in review of the stub I created for Horton Barker. I saw just the briefest clip of him in Festival and I was a goner. High on my article To-Do list is finding a picture that's out of copyright. I have also found some other sources I will use to fill in more detail, soon. I hope you enjoy listening to Horton Barker. So far I can't listen to more than a song or two at a time, as his singing hits me so hard and so poignantly. Thanks again.
Also, if this comment would be better published to my own User talk page, my apologies. The "talk" functions, policies, and practicies in Wikipedia are still not clear to me. Gcampbel (talk) 16:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Gcampbel and apologies on the delayed response. Glad you responded here because it will be great to reread your message the next time someone decides to leave me a less pleasant message!
- I was so psyched to come across the article - I had never heard of him (and I listen to a ton of old music). I listened to his version of "Amazing Grace" and it totally killed me. He has such a powerful voice. From what I read he also has an amazing story.
- Let me know if you need any help in your continued editing adventures, but it seems to me that you've done a great job figuring Wikipedia out! Best, Julie JSFarman (talk) 00:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
WikiConference North America 2019
You are invited to WikiConference North America 2019 on November 8-11 in Boston. Deadline for Program Submissions and Scholarship Applications is September 20. Hope to see you there! --Rosiestep (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Rosie! I am trying to figure it out today. I want to be there! xoxo JSFarman (talk) 14:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi JSFarman/Archive 7,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
October Events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm 94rain. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Brian Greenberg, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
94rain Talk 15:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi JSFarman/Archive 7,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Mistake?
Hi there. Just alerting you to what happened when you made this edit. I presume that wasn't intentional? Cordless Larry (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Cordless Larry! I'm seeing my commented related to the Alex Depledge deletion discussion. Maybe I'm having a cache issue? Or maybe my vision is even worse than I think it is? What are you seeing? (and thank you)! JSFarman (talk) 20:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- The edit also restored several sections that had been archived, and deleted several newer sections. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:53, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- AHA! Yes, def a mistake. I have no idea how that happened. I'll fix it! Thanks for letting me know. JSFarman (talk) 20:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- The edit also restored several sections that had been archived, and deleted several newer sections. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:53, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Deletion pending for File:Bob Woolf 1990.jpeg
Hello, JSFarman. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Bob Woolf 1990.jpeg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.
- If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
- If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest that you have commented on at the user's talk page. The thread is Karldmartini. Thank you. —-Guy Macon (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hipgnosis Songs Fund, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Knox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| For your continued and tireless contributions to record label related articles and your pursuit at attaining the highest quality for them. We need more like you around here! Robvanvee 05:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC) |
Jack Babuscio
Hi JSFarman! Thank you for your comments and guidance. I'm not sure if this is how I should be responding (I hope so!). I've only been contributing to Wikipedia for three weeks, so I'm very new here. I added a few additional sources today via academic sources (databases, journals, etc.) and a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ageshow (talk • contribs) 18:35, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Ageshow! This is definitely the right place to be responding, and welcome! You are doing amazingly well in navigating Wikipedia.
- I started working on the article yesterday and then (as always) ran out of time/focus. Your sources are great, and more can be added. I think that the lead needs to specify why he is in Wikipedia - something that indicates his influence in the definition of camp. (It will need to come directly from a reliable source.)
- Also, the BBC defines him as a queer film historian; I suspect that is how he described himself because the BBC doesn't generally take that kind of liberty. I think that should also be in the lead, or the infobox. But your call (although of course it can be changed by another editor).
- I will go back to the article as soon as I'm able and hopefully we can move it into the article space. Let me know if you have questions, and again, thank you! So glad you're here. I hope you stick around. JSFarman (talk) 16:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello JSFarman,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
- Getting the queue to 0
There are now 806 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.
- Coordinator
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
- This month's refresher course
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
- Tools
- It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
- It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
- Reviewer Feedback
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
- Second set of eyes
- Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
- Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
- Arbitration Committee
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
- Community Wish list
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Notice of subpage moved
Hello. This is a message to let you know that a subpage of your user page has been moved to User:JSFarman/sandbox/Melody Road (Neil Diamond album). This has been done since titles with consecutive apostrophes (for example, '' or ''') have been known to cause issues with wiki markup on pages if the page title is linked on other pages. Since the end of 2014, the creation of titles containing consecutive apostrophes has been restricted by Wikipedia's title creation blacklist. The page can now be found at User:JSFarman/sandbox/Melody Road (Neil Diamond album). Feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 23:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December events with WIR
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Rounder Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Folkways, Concord, Norman Blake, Union Station, Other Voices, Other Rooms, Dawes, George Pegram, John Strohm, Too Late to Cry and Corey Smith
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter December 2019
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosguill (talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Onel5969 (talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | JTtheOG (talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Arthistorian1977 (talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | DannyS712 (talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Boleyn (talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Ymblanter (talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Cwmhiraeth (talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
- Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
- Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
- This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
.jpg)
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
Chris Troutman (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- To you too! Hope to see you in 2020. It has been too long. Happy New Year! JSFarman (talk) 17:18, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Your recent review
Hi, I got a message that you reviewed by Wikipedia article Robert Lewis Byington. Thanks for doing this. I appreciate the time you guys spend on Wikipedia. I was wondering if you could review a draft for me? It is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Elwood_Walter,_No._7. I have spend a lot of time updating this wiki page with more citations and linked to other pages, e.g. Pilot boat, Joseph Henderson (Pilot), etc. They suggested that I contact someone else to review the page since the review queue is so long. I thank you in advance, if you can review the "Elwood Walter, No. 7" page. Greg Henderson 21:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Greg. Thanks for the note and so sorry that you have been waiting for so long for the article to be reviewed. (Also thanks for the Robert Lewis Byington article.) I will do my best on the Elwood Walter article, but it is quite far out of my area of expertise, and it'll take me a while. Thanks for all of your effort, it's clear that you have put a lot of time into the articles. JSFarman (talk) 16:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
draft article (Jennifer Zilm) your review 20 October 2019
hi -- happy new year! I'm a bit slow getting to this draft submission. I've read the relevant materials on notability, but I don't understand why Zilm doesn't qualify, as she has substantial (not passing) references to her work in both The Walrus (significant monthly Canadian literary/public affairs magazine) and Canadian Literature (a well-known academic literary review). She was also shortlisted for a significant poetry national Canadian award (Pat Lowther Award). The Canadian Literature and Walrus articles won't show up through a regular Google search -- they will show up if a database search is done through a library. Do the sources/references have to show up through a Google search to count? It would be somewhat rare for even many well-known, established Canadian poets to appear in Publisher's Weekly. Thanks for your help! cheers, Ktrainor7 (talk) 20:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ktrainor7 (talk) and happy new year to you too.
- I find that it can be very difficult for poets (and writers in general) to meet the notability criteria, and it's frustrating. There aren't a lot of publications that cover poetry and meet Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source. Fortunately references do not have to be online; just note the publication, name, writer, date of publication, etc. Enough info so that the assertions of the article can be verified. That said, I don't think being shortlisted for the Pat Lowther award goes to notability - the only shorlist slam dunks I can think of would be for the Pulitzer, National Book Award, Man Booker and the Nobel (although I am not sure if there is an official shortlist). Can you add whatever else you can find, online or off? I can re-review (or you can publish it directly). JSFarman (talk) 00:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Finis Conner
@JSFarman: The facts simply do not support JSFarman's decline of this article. NY Times and Fortune Magazine articles qualify as significant independent coverage of Finis Conner by reliable secondary sources. His founding of three of the pioneering disk drive companies should more than qualify him as a subject for Wikipedia. We can replace the Wikifoundry references with RSs at which point the article should be acceptable. Tom94022 (talk) 08:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Good morning @Tom94022:. For clarity's sake, at the time you submitted the draft, there were 13 references: Wikifoundry 3 times, a photo of Finis Conner, a press release serviced via Business Wire, the Conner website twice, two articles about the company (not the individual), and a Bloomberg "Are you a robot" landing page. If you can replace the Wikifoundry references with reliable sources please do so. However, with your new lede, I understand the basis of his notability, and another reviewer is likely to accept the article. JSFarman (talk) 15:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- FWIW the 1990 Fortune article referenced is almost all about Finis and his career at Shugart, Seagate and Conner Peripherals. The Bloomberg reference when corrected is also mainly about Conner. Tom94022 (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Likewise the NY Times article is mostly about Finis. Tom94022 (talk) 07:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- Also the Wikifoundry articles having been published by the Computer History Museum's Storage Special Interest Group are likely reliable sources. Tom94022 (talk) 07:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Tom94022: I added another New York Times ref and another Fortune ref as well as a Crain's ref about a company he founded in 2015. (Crains also wrote that Steve Jobs was his first customer: https://www.chicagobusiness.com/awards/finis-conner) I resubmitted the article on your behalf, but couldn't accept it (through AfC) because a Finis Conner redirect is blocking a move to the mainspace. (I requested that the redirect be deleted).JSFarman (talk) 01:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- @JSFarman: Thanks for all your help - can I delete this section as no longer relevant? I could archive it but why bother in keeping it? Yr recommendation? Tom94022 (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Tom94022:. My pleasure. Thanks for writing the article (and your perseverance). I agree that it doesn't need to be here but I am going to move it to my talk page. If only because it's evidence that AfC reviewers are truly interested in seeing worthy articles published! Thank you again. JSFarman (talk) 20:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- @JSFarman: Thanks for all your help - can I delete this section as no longer relevant? I could archive it but why bother in keeping it? Yr recommendation? Tom94022 (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Tom94022: I added another New York Times ref and another Fortune ref as well as a Crain's ref about a company he founded in 2015. (Crains also wrote that Steve Jobs was his first customer: https://www.chicagobusiness.com/awards/finis-conner) I resubmitted the article on your behalf, but couldn't accept it (through AfC) because a Finis Conner redirect is blocking a move to the mainspace. (I requested that the redirect be deleted).JSFarman (talk) 01:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Please don't copy and paste text to new titles
I'm having to clean up a few messes you made with Wynter Gordon/Diana Gordon (singer) and related articles. Please do not move articles by copy and pasting the text, because the edit history is lost in the process. —C.Fred (talk) 14:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
- @C.Fred: Hi and thank you! I did not think that one through - another learning experience (which I really should have figured out). Thank you thank you thank you - that was a ton of cleanup. JSFarman (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Ron Stone Photograph and Release
Hi JS -
Thanks so much for your kind effort to assist. I'm copying and pasting the photographers release and uploading the headshot of Ron Stone to be included on his Wikipedia page, which is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Stone_(music_industry_executive)
I uploaded the image, but don't see it appearing here. Thanks so much for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richardstellar (talk • contribs) 12:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, in order to use the photo the photographer needs to sign off on the complete release and send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. You can find it here: Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Also - for future ref - you don't want to leave personal email addresses on talk pages! JSFarman (talk) 17:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Do you think that this draft should be accepted? If so, I will move the redirect; please let me know whether you want help. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Robert and thanks for asking - I would appreciate your help with the redirect. The draft should be accepted; they meet notability, although more refs can still be added. (They're just a grind to find - mostly from offline sources such as books and old newspapers and magazines.) Thanks again! JSFarman (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David A. Stewart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Would I Lie to You? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello JSFarman,
- Source Guide Discussion
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
- Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Sabath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LP1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020 at Women in Red
   Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Five years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, Gerda Arendt. Thank you times five. That you noticed my work made such a huge difference for me on Wikipedia early on -- it made me feel connected to the community, and it is one of the reasons I stuck around. JSFarman (talk) 21:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- ... now 6 --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Covered bridges in Connecticut
Thanks for moving my article into the main article space, but I actually had intended to do more work on it before publication. No problem, though, I will continue to work on it there. fixing the title of my article, which I thought I had created in user space. However, it should technically be titled, "List of covered bridges in Connecticut" to follow the naming convention of corresponding articles for other states. If you could move it to that name without creating a link having the current name, that would be great. Waz8:T-C-E 19:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Waz8:T-C - Sorry about that! It was actually already in the main space - I will move it back to draft (where you can change the name as well). Thanks for writing the article; I'm a New Englander and I love those bridges! JSFarman (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will continue to work on it there then move it to the main article space with the appropriate name. I've always been fascinated by bridges, especially the covered ones. There are quite a few pictures of them in my bridge gallery. Waz8:T-C-E 22:27, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Edif/Comment on Samora Smallwood article
Hello, Thank you for the comments on my draft article Samora Smallwood. I am attempting to edit it and I'm very new at this. Can you tell me what you mean by 'remove the links in the body of the article.' Samdal35ton (talk) 04:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Link to article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Samora_Smallwood
Thank you,
Karen
Samdal35ton (talk) 04:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Karen (talk) and thanks for persevering!
- Links within the articles should only lead to other Wikipedia articles - those are Wikilinks. For example, the wikicode for my user page is [[User:JSFarman|Julie Farman]], not [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JSFarman Julie Farman ] , which renders as Julie Farman, not Julie Farman If an article exists on Wikipedia, you can Wikilink it, but if there's no article, it should just appear in plain text. The only time users should be taken off Wikipedia is via references and through the external links that are included at the end of most articles. Hope that helps, and feel free to ping me if you need more help! JSFarman (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Partial revert
Please note that I reverted your addition of a date of birth to Cara Buono as the date has been disputed (see the related discussions on the article talk page) and you didn't provide the reliable sources required for a date to be included as required by policy. Could you advise which source you used for the date? Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- I just checked out the talk page and the history and I'm cracking up. I thought it was such an innocuous edit! (I used Playbill as it is generally reliable.)
- I want to expand the article but I won't add a DoB when I do -- I just tried to find a solid reference and as far as I can tell nothing ironclad exists. (Is the DoB controversy what the article is semi-protected?) JSFarman (talk) 02:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is indeed. If a date of birth is missing from an article, always best to check the talk page. There's generally something there that will explain the absence of a date.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 02:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice
Hi JSFarman, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.
Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.
To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!
Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello JSFarman,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Request for Review
Hello, John, I had created a wikipedia draft and submitted it. Its has not been reviewed for almost 3 months. Please could you help and review the draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Adeeb_Ahamed. Thank you very much. (Kuruvillac (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC))
Draft:Cheryl_Hsieh
Hello JSFarman, I've modified the draft page according to your advice. Please let me know if it's ok now. Thank you so much for your time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cheryl_HsiehNepotismTW (talk) 13:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)