User talk:JIP/Archive 29

Nomination of Scraplets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scraplets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scraplets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Claritas § 16:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In case the deletion patrol erase your work on this article, I copied it to Wikialpha. You can edit it there. http://en.wikialpha.org/wiki/Scraplets Mathewignash (talk) 14:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Xide (drink), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlsberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Golden Cap (cider)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Golden Cap (cider) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bob Re-born (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Golden Cap (cider)

The article Golden Cap (cider) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A brand of apple cider, page makes no claim of notability and does not cite any secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 22:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

old decisions

hello;

i was just working on restoring an article jelq that had gone through the very familliar cycle of merge<redirect<vanish (the word itself actually no longer appeared in the redirected-to article).

in restoring, i noticed that there had been a deletion discussion, & that you were the admin who closed the discussion as "no consensus"

the opinions (all with comments) counted out as 7 keep, 3 deletion & one neutral.

i do not understand how that becomes a "no consensus"?

please explain what i'm missing here?

o__0

Lx 121 (talk) 08:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the contribution

Appreciate your contribution of Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka to improve the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.172.31 (talk) 10:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kohvik Moon

The article Kohvik Moon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable business + recentism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BO | Talk 15:38, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amiga Internet and communications software for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amiga Internet and communications software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amiga Internet and communications software until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. James086 ^Talk 17:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Association of Performing Arts Presenters

Just wanted to give you a heads-up, since you had deleted Association of Performing Arts Presenters some years ago. The article you deleted was totally uncited, etc., but I believe the organization is (very) notable, and I've undeleted and attempted a rescue. Do let me know if you have any problem with the article as it now stands, especially if you think I haven't justified that as notable enough. I'd hope I can address any issues you might still have. - Jmabel | Talk 07:32, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eldrad

Here's a link to a site which hosts Dotor Who Episodes, directly to the episode Hand of Fear which includes Eldrad. I can't comment on the copyright status of the episode in Finland, of course. The backstory that you need to know is that the long curly-haired guy in the floppy hat and long scarf is the Doctor, a time-travelling alien, The blue box (TARDIS) is his spaceships, and Sarah, the pretty girl in the pink overalls is a human journalist who has been his companion on various dangerous adventures. The Doctor is trying to take her home, but he has navigation problems... μηδείς (talk) 21:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P Head

I need this for the wiki I'm making. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.213.156 (talk) 20:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move photo to Wikimedia Commons

Could you please move "Restaurant car in Austria.jpg" to Wikimedia Commons so it can be used internationally?

Thanks! --85.127.251.18 (talk) 09:57, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It should have now been transferred to WikiMedia Commons. I have added a "Now Commons" tag on the original local file so that it is marked for deletion. JIP | Talk 14:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 23435fbd71af3e99a3b0628a46500ec7

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Villains

Hello, JIP. A while ago you asked a question at the Reference Desk asking for names of villains. Was your submission accepted? Pokajanje|Talk 04:44, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately it wasn't. JIP | Talk 05:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What were the rooms named instead? Pokajanje|Talk 00:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Different animals. JIP | Talk 04:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Markdown implementations

Hi JIP,

I noticed you closed the prod for "List of Markdown implementations". Could you provide temp access to the list, or alternatively, the names of the two entries that have WP articles? I would like to add these to Markdown as mentioned in the prod.

Thanks, --Mark viking (talk) 06:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the entries in the list that show up as blue links: Doxygen, RStudio, IntelliJ IDEA, MultiMarkdown and BlueCloth. JIP | Talk 15:25, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for looking these up! --Mark viking (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of politicians who have met with Pope Francis

Can you please restore the talk page? The templates have to go, but my section doesn't. Janus Savimbi (talk) 14:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. JIP | Talk 16:18, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Janus Savimbi (talk) 20:48, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rev. Stuart Campbell

I recently completed the article for Rev. Stuart Campbell. I contacted the Reverend today to let him know that he was the subject of an new WP entry, and while rather pleased, he did state that he had to request the deletion of his previous article (and that was before all the "Scottish Independence debate") due to continual edit-warring. As he is a much more prominent figure since the last the article was created, may I request that you keep an eye out and quickly move to semi-protect if the need arises? Thanks. Hillbillyholiday ^talk 17:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to keep that in mind. JIP | Talk 17:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stuart Campbell (games journalist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Reid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Bonka, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Bonka" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 16:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Legolas by Laura for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legolas by Laura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legolas by Laura until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 11:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nacktfussball

Hello JIP,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nacktfussball for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sources accepted (I am a natural German speaker). However, in view of the large number of deletions and proposed deletions to your creations, perhaps you will now begin to understand the importance of establishing notability before you post new articles. If you need any help don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Mary folklore in popular culture Merge

Hi

Thanks for your comments on the merge proposal. Having left it a week and having had no further comments, I think its time for decisions.
Having had 3 agree that merging is commonsense, and the only "opposition" just wanting the article deleting all together... The commonsense outcome would be to merge.

However the one wanting the article deleted has decided that that is not acceptable and that his view must go above the agreement of the wider community... and so has reverted the merge.

Not being the most expert at merging (this is the first one I had proposed) I was looking for some feedback on what the next step would be; the one wanting it deleted rather than merged doesn't strike me as open to common-sense or reasoned discussion.

Thanks
--Rushton2010 (talk) 21:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

outnumbered by Germans

I wrote you a response here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Miscellaneous#Making_mocking_melodies_over_folk_songs. I have one German and no English great-grandparents. μηδείς (talk) 01:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Londonese

Terve! I replied to your question about "Londonese" on the reference desk. Is the phrase "puhua Lontoota" still current? I used to hear it sometimes in the past but not so often anymore. :) --Pxos (talk) 23:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is still being used from time to time. JIP | Talk 02:04, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chelsea Smile for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chelsea Smile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Smile (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 09:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nacktfussball

It's because it's a "sexuality stub", probably. Easily fixed - I'll do so now. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:27, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your opinion on a photo

Hi. We really need your opinion on which of these photos would make the best Infobox portrait for the Rick Remender article. Could you please offer your opinion in that discussion? The most recent subsection of that discussion is here, so you can just chime in there if you don't want to read the whole thread. I really appreciate it. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of McDonald's may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sandstorm (Transformers) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandstorm (Transformers) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandstorm (Transformers) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 15:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nucleon (Transformers) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nucleon (Transformers) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nucleon (Transformers) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]