Jump to content

User talk:IslamMyLoveMyLife

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is lies and false. Your sources are flawed. No point in publishing crap on wikipedia. That's why people dont trust wikipedia because it's full of garbage from nutters like you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.153.251 (talk) 17:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ashamed that bad guys like you are running Wikipedia, people shouldn't talk to other people like that later. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 14:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, IslamMyLoveMyLife! Thank you for your contributions. I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Ed talk! 18:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evyallah IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 18:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Muslim saints from the Old Testament has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Muslim saints from the Old Testament has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing figures from the Hebrew Bible and New Testament as "Early Islamic preachers"

[edit]

Ridiculous.Smeat75 (talk) 22:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, seriously, you think Goliath, for instance, was an "Early Islamic preacher"? What? Utterly absurd but thanks for the laugh.Smeat75 (talk) 23:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gabriel the Archangel was not an "Early Islamic preacher " because archangels do not exist, there was never any such thing to preach Islam, even if it had wanted to, which there is no reason to imagine.Smeat75 (talk) 23:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Smeat75: How can you falsify the religions?, remaining one Islam told that These all people and angels have preached Islam, remember, you cannot hurt any Muslim, Christian, Jew, Believer of Bahai Faith, etc IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 06:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:ABIAS and note that

Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are.
— User:Ian.thomson

Smeat75 (talk) 10:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note MOS:PBUH. We do not use honorifics such as "peace be upon him" or "saw" anywhere on wikipedia.Smeat75 (talk) 10:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jonah; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 06:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Early Islamic preachers has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Early Islamic preachers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilatti Tuturial

[edit]

Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilatti Tuturial (talk • contribs) 10:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Selamun Aleykum! @Wikilatti Tuturial: IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 13:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pre-Muslim saints has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Pre-Muslim saints has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned about your thinking that the Bible says Adam and Eve were Christians

[edit]

Where did you get that idea? Doug Weller talk 17:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He also put John the Baptist into a category "Muslim saints from the Old Testament" and Elizabeth (biblical figure), Isaiah‎, Jeremiah‎, Paul the Apostle and other equally absurd ones into a category "Medieval Islamic preachers". I think WP:CIR may need to be invoked.Smeat75 (talk) 18:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new categories

[edit]

Please take a break in creating new categories. There is a rapid consensus that your category creations so far were not a good idea. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, IMO you are at least approaching WP:Disruptive editing. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree. Despite warnings on this page, the editor continues the same way. First he put Goliath into a category "Muslim saints from the Old Testament" , then when that was removed, he put Goliath into Islamic figures from the Torah and Psalms, then "early Islamic preachers" (!), currently back in "Muslim saints in the Old Testament" and the new category,which he created today, Islamic personalities mentioned in the Hebrew Bible. This is all utterly ludicrous. Presumably he knows who Goliath is? A big old villainous giant in a folk legend, in no way a saint or preacher, and I don't know how this character can possibly be considered "Islamic". I don't think he knows what "medieval" means as he put Paul the Apostle in a category "Medieval Islamic preachers"! (now emptied.)
IslamMyLoveMyLife please stop your WP:Disruptive editing. Stop creating categories and putting people into them from the Hebrew Bible and New Testament that categorize them as Islamic. Otherwise you will be taken to WP:ANI very soon with a request for a topic ban or indefinite block.Smeat75 (talk) 15:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And FYI IslamMyLoveMyLife, Jesus, John the Baptist, Disciples of Jesus and St. Peter, do not appear in the "Old Testament" therefore they do not belong in a category "Muslim saints in the Old Testament", whether they are actually considered "Muslim saints" or not.Smeat75 (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcocapelle: and @Smeat75: For the sake of God, the Prophets and biblical figures should not be included only in the Christianity and Judaism, when these people have a great status in Islam, like other Abrahamic faiths. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 10:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes but there is no need for 7 categories. Two is enough, for Hebrew Bible people in Islam and for New Testament people in Islam. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Marcocapelle: Again! I do not agree with names, They are not considered Non-Muslims in Islam, they are considered Muslims (But also Islamic prophet Muhammad was born in the 6th century), So it should be Category:Islamic personalities from the Hebrew Bible and Category:Islamic personalities from the New Testament . IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 14:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also per guidelines WP:CATV Categorization of articles must be verifiable. It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories. These prophets and people from the Hebrew Bible and New Testament should not be put into a category "Muslim saints" unless the article explicitly states with sources that Islam has made them saints. According to Wali the Salafi movement, Wahhabism, and Islamic Modernism, all three of which have, to a greater or lesser degree, "formed a front against the veneration and theory of saints. So that's millions of Muslims who do not even accept the concept of "Muslim saints",never mind retroactively applying the term to pre-Islamic characters in stories a lot of which have no historical basis, or people who were certainly Jewish or Christian and not Muslim at all. Also per guidelines WP:CATDEF A central concept used in categorizing articles is that of the defining characteristics of a subject of the article. A defining characteristic is one that reliable sources commonly and consistently define the subject as having". So unless their stature in Islam is such that it is a defining characteristic, these people from the Hebrew Bible or New Testament should not be put in categories such as "Islamic figure" or "Islamic personality".Smeat75 (talk) 11:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medieval Islamic preachers has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Medieval Islamic preachers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pre-Islamic figures has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Pre-Islamic figures has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Muslim saints from the Old Testment has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Muslim saints from the Old Testment has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Islamic figures has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Islamic figures has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Islamic figures from Quran has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Islamic figures from Quran has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Islamic personalities mentioned in the Hebrew Bible has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Islamic personalities mentioned in the Hebrew Bible has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Important Prophets of Islam has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Important Prophets of Islam has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is "Disruptive editor on categories of people from the Hebrew Bible and New Testament".--Smeat75 (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss first

[edit]

Salam IslamMyLoveMyLife!

I'm Muslim too and I appreciate what you're trying to do. But I think you should discuss first and get input from various users before creating and adding categories. It will require time and patience but that way your categories as less likely to be deleted. Otherwise you can end up being blocked, which will not be a good outcome as I think you have a potential for being a valuable contributor.VR talk 02:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me, It was your idea to rename the category. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 10:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You could start a discussion at WT:ISLAM or WT:CAT, ideally leaving a notice at the other one to draw more attention.
But first of all, I recommend that you explore up and down the existing categories thoroughly. You may well find that what is really needed actually does already exist, even if it has different names to what you might have expected. – Fayenatic London 12:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
IslamMyLoveMyLife, I would love to help you. For the time being, can you commit to discussing changes first before you make them? As you learn more you will be able to make good changes without discussion, but for now discussing first is a better way to go. This will also re-assure others at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editor_on_categories_of_people_from_the_Hebrew_Bible_and_New_Testament.VR talk 17:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@IslamMyLoveMyLife: Collaboration is required at Wikipedia. When people raise issues you must stop and discuss. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse but the essence of successful editing is getting along with others. Johnuniq (talk) 23:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq: Will TeaHouse match the answer to absolutely everything from Wikipedia? IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 17:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sunni Rashidun Caliphs

[edit]

I see you created Category:Sunni Rashidun Caliphs. How is that different from the already existing Category:Rashidun Caliphs? VR talk 15:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This category is not at all different from this but this category should also be here because these Rightly Guided Caliphs have an important position in Sunni View. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So are you suggesting that "Rashidun Caliphs" be moved to "Sunni Rashidun Caliphs"? Otherwise its duplicate.VR talk 18:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Muslim saints from the Old Testament is still in discussion, while i am going to remove Prophets mentioned here because they are not regarded as saints in Islam, like Churches, and adding them in a new category Category:Islamic prophets from the Hebrew Bible. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 16:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pushing fringe theory

[edit]

Information icon Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 17:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. Jeppiz (talk) 17:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Jeppiz (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore the last warning above; it is incorrect. My apologies for that mistake. Jeppiz (talk) 18:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour needs to change

[edit]

Hello, your current editing history is very disruptive and will soon see you blocked from editing unless you completely change the way you edit. I do think you have good motives, so I want to help. Please understand that Wikipedia is not edited from an Islamic perspective (nor from any other religious perspective). People of all faiths are welcome and we have lots of great contributors who are Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Hindu, atheist etc. However, none of us are allowed to edit based on how we think it "should be". Quite the contrary, we have several policies against that. I suggest you read WP:OR, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:V and WP:OWN very carefully. They are rules you need to follow, just like anyone else. It is fine to edit about Islam (or any other religion) but based on what scholars say about the religion, not based on belief. Jeppiz (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree that IslamMyLoveMyLife has good motives, but IslamMyLoveMyLife you need to understand policy and discuss before making changes.VR talk 18:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeppiz: and @Vice regent: When I came to Wikipedia, every thing was difficult and tough for me and slowly i learn more from editing, can you please tell me What is TeaHouse? With your help, I can easily edit Wikipedia by looking at all the rules. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 19:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@IslamMyLoveMyLife:: here is what you must do: before making a change propose it on the talk page. Only if no one objects then make the change. If you don't do this you can end up getting blocked permanently.VR talk 23:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
About the Teahouse, see User_talk:IslamMyLoveMyLife#Welcome!. There's other useful links there too. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Seth, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 19:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Melcous (talk) 22:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 72 hours

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for You've been warned many times for POV and unsourced editing, not to mention the ANI thread about your inappropriate creation of categories.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Seth shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 10:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--GPinkerton (talk) 10:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop - Final warning

[edit]

Please stop adding articles to idiosyncratic categories; it is disruptive and wastes other editors' time reverting your submissions. If you continue to do so, without having first obtained consensus from other editors that these categories are useful and meaningful, you will be blocked from editing.

I suggest that you now either divert your efforts elsewhere, or concentrate on achieving consensus for any new categories you may wish to add, before you start to add them. -- The Anome (talk) 11:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely for ignoring repeated warnings and being the subject of two ANI threads

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IslamMyLoveMyLife (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Ohnoitsjamie: I understand what i am blocked for, i was continuously making disruptive edits, and i will not repeat it again, I only need the forum where i can ask every thing about the Wikipedia, I always enjoy Wikipedia. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 01:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have ignored too, too many warnings, including a shot-across-the-bow 72-hour block for ignoring warnings. Bishonen | tålk 03:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're going to need to do better than that. You may want to explain why you continued to create contentious categories after two ANI threads, a 72 hours, and many many warnings from a variety of editors. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:52, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Bishonen: Yes, I didn't take it seriously, and continue my vandalized edits, However, I received so many warnings, But that's because Christian bias (The Category:Christian saints from the Old Testament and many other Biased categories) and the categorization of John The Baptist into the Category:Christian martyrs executed by decapitation. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ohnoitsjamie: I continue my disruptive edits because of the Christian bias categories, which should be renamed But that was my stupidity that i didn't request them for renaming, I was thinking that i can better explain the the Islamic figures, I am sorry This will not happen again, I'm ready if you have any more questions. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 01:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ohnoitsjamie: I wanted a forum where I could read Wikipedia's rules, and make me a better Wikipedian, i sent you a unblock request because i read on the Guide to appealing blocks "It's important that you understand the reasons why the administrator blocked you before starting an unblock request. A block is not intended as punishment; it's meant to prevent you from making disruptive edits, either in good faith or as vandalism.". IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 01:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
IslamMyLoveMyLife, hi. A piece of advice that is often given to people who feel so passionately about a particular subject is that they learn how to edit collaboratively in areas that aren't so important to them before trying to edit articles they feel strongly about. From your username and your editing habits so far, I assume that you have a passionate devotion to the Islamic faith; I respect that deeply, but that passion, and your eagerness to change how things about the subject are presented here, may be what led you into this position. I do not want to give you the impression that we are in any way biased against Islam, or indeed any religion - rather, a passion for any subject often leads to difficulties for an editor, because it can make it difficult for them to work well with people who have different viewpoints. We are a diverse community of lots of very different people working here, and our aim is always to present information neutrally, and based strictly on what academic sources say. Passion for a subject is a hard thing to square with that.
If you are genuine in your wish to become a better Wikipedian, I strongly suggest that you make a new unblock request, in which you indicate that you would accept a topic ban from religion, broadly construed, as a condition of your unblock. (Please read that link so you understand what a topic ban would entail). That would allow you to spend time gaining experience and understanding how we work here. If, after six-twelve months of uncontroversial and productive editing, you wanted to edit religious subjects again, you could ask at WP:AN that your ban be lifted.
On the other hand, if you are only here because you want to edit on the subject of religion, I think that you'll struggle to convince anyone to unblock you at this point. We desperately need more productive and collaborative editors, and we truly value diversity amongst our community; we don't, however, need any more editors interested only in presenting a single subject from a single viewpoint. I hope that's not a fair description of yourself. Best wishes GirthSummit (blether) 18:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Girth Summit: Thank you very much for giving me these advice, I will do everything you tell me to do but i still need a forum where i can discuss everything about What to do and what not to do? This can help to become better Wikipedian, but i would like to add more about Islamic faith, You help me a lot. IslamMyLoveMyLife (talk) 05:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you need a forum to discuss specific questions, there is the WP:TEAHOUSE. Most important though are talk pages - suggest changes on them, discuss changes on them, engage with anyone who disagrees with you. You could also look at WP:ADVENTURE or WP:TUTORIAL, which will take you through lots of our policies and good practice.
As I said, I think you should rule out editing about Islam for now - you will need to learn more about collaborative editing before dipping your toe back into the waters of religious articles. I would personally not accept an unblock request that was not accompanied by a TBan from religion, broadly construed. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 05:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shia caliphs has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Shia caliphs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Constantine ✍ 18:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Islamic prophets from the Hebrew Bible has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Islamic prophets from the Hebrew Bible has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sunni caliphs has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Sunni caliphs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Women of the Hebrew Bible in Islam

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Women of the Hebrew Bible in Islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IslamMyLoveMyLife&oldid=991529742"