User talk:Isaidnoway/Archive 7
A message from 80.192.187.151
[edit]I saw you on the Dreamcast best selling games one. Should there be a Sega Saturn page? I know of 5 games I can prove sold over 1 million (VF2, VF1, Sega Rally, Daytona, Virtua Cop) 80.192.187.151 (talk) 01:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think five games would warrant a separate article, maybe they could be added to one of the other Sega Saturn pages. Thanks for reaching out. Isaidnoway (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well the Dreamcast page does a minimum of games that have sold at least 250k. There's plenty of Saturn games that did that and with enough sources to verify them. Just wanted to see if there were others with the interest in making the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.23.59.185 (talk) 17:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
A message from Mtjannetta
[edit]Glossary of slang used in reviewing silent movie melodrama
[edit]Cheers!
First, Thank you for alerting me to use Harv instead of sfn refs in footnotes.
Secondly, when you tagged my glossary with more "citations needed" - are you suggesting each term of the over 1100 entries will need a reference? This will, of course, will create a huge ref section at the bottom of the page.
Since I can't place the ref# between the "Term"and "Defn" per glossary MOS rules and if I place it after the first "defn" in a multiple entry term, it implies its only applicable to that particular term. If I have a term with four definitions, would each "Defn" need to be referenced?
Thus my question - where would you suggest I place the Ref# so as to not violate rules stated in the glossary MOS?
I do have a Ref# for every term, so please let me know what you think.
Thanks Michael Jannetta (talk) 06:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- The article has a section titled Works cited (Books, Web Dictionaries and PDFs, Websites), but it isn't clear to our readers exactly how or where in the article those works are being cited. And from my reading of WP:GLOSSARIES - Glossaries are subject to all of the same rules (e.g. Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) as other content on Wikipedia. So our readers need to be able to verify the content/slang comes from a published reliable source(s). I don't know what the exact solution is, but maybe, for example in each section (A B C D, etc.) immediately before {{glossary start}} or after {{glossary end}}, there could be a Sources:<ref1><ref2><ref3> - so readers will know what the source(s) are for the terms. I looked at a few other glossary articles, and there doesn't seem to really be any consistency, Glossary of professional wrestling terms, Glossary of cricket terms, Glossary of video game terms. Some use inline citations infrequently, and I see the same issue being raised in the video game glossary - needs additional citations for verification. Anyway, thanks for reaching out, I appreciate it, and good luck. Isaidnoway (talk) 07:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. I'd just like to thank you for finalizing the citations on the above page I recently created. I do apologize for leaving you with the legwork of the coding. I couldn't figure out what I did wrong with the reference at the bottom of the page, and I was waiting for somebody else's edits to teach me. I still need to read the finer details of your finalizations, but thank you so much again. I was more focused on getting the page done, I don't have the time or attention span for it easily. Hope I didn't irritate you or give you a headache. I'd even thank the Citation Bot if it wasn't ridiculous. XD ContributingHelperOnTheSide (talk) 13:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
today's reversions
[edit]Today you reverted my revisions to the John Love (congressman) article. I disagree but didn't unrevert them, since I was trying to fix another article and my cyberbullies apparently struck again. The reason for yesterday's (now reverted) expansion is to explain the error and limitations in this man's initial bio, as well as link him with his distant nephew, also John Love, who continued the family's martial tradition but remained loyal to the Union (even becoming a general). The family has a somewhat typical for their era/class (but admittedly confusing) recycling of names. While their father Samuel Love is wikipedia-worthy for his Maryland service and patriotism, all three generations can easily be confused. Obviously, I was trying to disambiguate such, but did not have time to review my edits as the only library with the relevant items closed.Jweaver28 (talk) 00:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the drive!
[edit]Welcome, welcome, welcome Isaidnoway! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
Cielquiparle (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Boeing aircraft
[edit]I manually reverted this edit of yours at List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 737 because it was not correct. Boeing, like most aviation manufacturers, uses hyphens in their model number system, not dashes. You are not the first editor to make this mistake, so I'm considering making a template to prevent further confusion like I did with Template:USAF serial. In the meantime, are there any other articles where you changed the hyphens in aircraft model numbers to dashes? - ZLEA T\C 02:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Edmond de Goeyse.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edmond de Goeyse.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука13 08:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Disagree — Lame nomination. File is clearly and accurately described.✦•┈๑⋅⋯ Isaidnoway (talk)⋯⋅๑┈•✦13:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
God bless you and Wikipedia
[edit]. 2409:40D4:106F:C2A9:E031:B0CD:279D:D7E8 (talk) 07:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
November 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award
[edit]
Citation Barnstar | ||
This award is given in recognition to Isaidnoway for collecting more than 377.0 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's NOV24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 8,000 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer Alt (talk) 17:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Isaidnoway. Thank you for your work on Flamingo Boy. Another editor, DoctorWhoFan91, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
I removed a ref as it was sadly not reliable. Article's good, but could do with expansion, especially the plot.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DoctorWhoFan91}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- It was just a book review, but nonetheless, I converted it to an external link. 🥳13:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Operation FRANKLIN
[edit]Operation name was wrong. It's frankLIN not frankTON. Lori Just-Laurie (talk) 02:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)