User talk:Interscope Web

This is Interscope Web's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukesh Parpiani (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The text is written like an advertisement, and would need to be completely rewritten to be appropriate for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mukesh Parpiani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Interscope Web! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 07:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello Interscope Web. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Interscope Web. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Interscope Web|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 07:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, your user name appears to represent an organisation rather than one individual, which is not allowed. Promotional user names go against Wikipedia's terms of service, and accounts may not be shared. --bonadea contributions talk 07:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Interscope Web, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Interscope Web|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 07:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or website, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Interscope Web (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

we unkwoningly used our business username instead of personal. I, Mukesh Parpiani myself wanted to create my wikipedia page Interscope Web (talk) 11:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't get to write about ourselves on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We want to create article of Mukesh Parpiani an Indian photojournalist so what can be done Interscope Web (talk) 10:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply" to edit this page; the reply function is imperfect and not useful in every situation.

You've already been provided with instructions as to what you can do- please review the block notice carefully. If Mr. Parpani is your client, that must be disclosed according to the Terms of Use(see WP:PAID). You've also made things worse by making it clear multiple people have access to this account(Mr. Parpani and the "we" that you mention). 331dot (talk) 10:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now also socking with Mukesh Parpiani. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appologises, the block is no longer necessary because I have understood what I have been blocked for and will not do it again, thus please unblock this account so I can make productive edits instead. I Kashish Parpiani is writing this article for my father (Mukesh Parpiani) and I have no vested commercial interest for the same. My company is under the name of Interscope and thus initially I created the account under my company name. Humbly awaiting a favorable response Interscope Web (talk) 06:51, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make a new unblock request for someone else to review, and you'll also need to explain your use of another account, which was inappropriate. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I put a new unblock request Interscope Web (talk) 12:33, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You write out a new one, just as you did your first, placed below. I would highly recommend clicking "edit" to edit this page and not "reply" to make your request. "Reply" does not accommodate unblock requests well- and is an imperfect function not useful in every situation anyway. 331dot (talk) 12:37, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Interscope Web (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Appologises, the block is no longer necessary because I have understood what I have been blocked for and will not do it again, thus please unblock this account so I can make productive edits instead. I Kashish Parpiani is writing this article for my father (Mukesh Parpiani) and I have no vested commercial interest for the same. My company is under the name of Interscope and thus initially I created the account under my company name. Humbly awaiting a favorable response

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but saying "I understand why I was blocked and I won't do it again" really isn't good enough. Why exactly were you blocked, in your understanding, and what other issues might be problematic in this case? (Hint: I'm looking for more than one thing here.) And how will you be editing going forward, should you be unblocked, so that these problems won't remain? I'm declining your request until you can make a more convincing appeal. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

Initially the account was blocked because the article was not deemed appropiate. I have now prepared a proper draft after going through numerous Wikipedia articles and inserting inline citations and refrences. The draft submitted currently is very amateur and after studying Wikipedia articles and suggestions I have prepared a comprehensive draft now and would like to submit the same. I thus appeal for unblocking my account so i can edit the draft. I would like to add there is no commercial vested interest and I Kashish Parpiani is submitting this draft regarding my father Mukesh Parpiani. Interscope Web (talk) 08:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you'll need to make an actual unblock request, formatted using the same template as before, otherwise your request won't show up in the administrators' feed.

To answer my own earlier question, here are some of the issues you need to understand, and may wish to address in your appeal:

Conflicts of interest
Neutral point of view and promotional editing
Notability
Referencing requirements in articles on living people
Sockpuppetry

Take your time, that's quite a lot to work through.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

The earlier draft submitted is very amateur and after studying Wikipedia articles and suggestions I have prepared a comprehensive draft with references and inline citations and would like to submit the same. I thus appeal for unblocking my account so i can edit the draft. I would like to add there is no commercial vested interest and I Kashish Parpiani is submitting this draft regarding my father Mukesh Parpiani. My father Mukesh Parpiani is a notable Indian Photographer and I thus would like to make this Wikipedia tribute to him. I humbly request to unblock this account. Interscope Web (talk) 09:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are writing "unblock request" but your requests will not be placed in the queue(so no one will see them) unless you use the unblock request template to make them. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read any of the things I've written here, including the policies and guidelines I've pointed to? Genuine question, because it doesn't look like you have. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]