User talk:Innoinco
A tag has been placed on InnoInco, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Evilclown93 15:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello Fang Aili. You have recently deleted page InnoInco - 14:47, 13 April 2007 Fang Aili (Talk | contribs) deleted "Innoinco" (WP:CSD G11 - advertising).
I remember I have posted this page before and it had much less of an informative content and I was suggested to review this page and add more of informative, encyclopedic content and less of a company advertisement. That is exactly what I tried to do with this new page you have deleted. I did try to put it together in a way, that I WOULD NOT advertise company, but instead provide essential information about it and its history. I thought I did a good job with it, but appears that not good enough :-).
Could you please spare few minutes of your time and review the innoinco page, that was deleted and let me know, what exactly should be removed (or added) to innoinco page so that I would not get under criteria of WP:CSD G11
Thank you in advance. --Innoinco 18:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- I looked over it again. And you're right, it's not terribly spammy, it just doesn't say why the company is notable according to Wikipedia's standards. Just like we don't have articles on every garage band, we don't have articles on every business just because it's a business. Have a look at those notability pages and let me know if you still think it should have an article. Also, if you would like a copy of it sent to you, email me using the "E-mail this user" link on the left, under 'toolbox'. Thanks, Fang Aili talk 14:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)