User talk:Infofile

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:101 Damnations, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 101 Damnations (album). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JackSchmidt (talk) 17:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate article

There are two copies of the 101 Dam-Nations article. There must be only one such copy. Please fix this. JackSchmidt (talk) 17:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to 101 Damnations. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Mr.Xp (talk) 22:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to 101 Damnations. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem should be fixed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Gilmour

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Gilmour, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JASpencer (talk) 19:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean Heaphy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sean Heaphy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JASpencer (talk) 19:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eyes of Ice

The article Eyes of Ice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable song long marked for notability and unreferenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]