Jump to content

User talk:Indy beetle/Archives/2017

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evan Freed Kennedy photos

[edit]

The pictures have been published in many places and are public domain. You might get in touch with Evan Freed for additional information. Here is his link with contact info on the State Bar of Calif website: http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/89514 Schmausschmaus (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your picture and map additions

[edit]

are much appreciated, thanks. H. N. Y. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 15:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help! -Indy beetle (talk) 17:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Operation Grandslam

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Grandslam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Swiss Barnstar of National Merit
For all the work you've done to improve the amount of information published on Wikipedia regarding the history of Switzerland. Thanks! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
this WikiAward was given to {{subst:PAGENAME}} by ~~~ on ~~~~~

Your GA nomination of Operation Grandslam

[edit]

The article Operation Grandslam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Grandslam for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 11:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply] 

Congrats on bringing it to GA, carry on.--Catlemur (talk) 11:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saïo, Saïo, it's off to work we go....

[edit]

[1] Added this link to your article, which should encourage more visits from well wishers. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 12:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith-264: Much appreciated! Just one question: What does "Big Two" mean? -Indy beetle (talk) 13:23, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was considering creating articles on the captures of Asosa and Gambela, both conflicts preceding the siege. At the moment, it seems that the only sources that talk at length abouth these events are the Belgian Information Center publication and the official history of the KAF. -Indy beetle (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Civil Rights Address

[edit]

Very good additions and citation work on this article. I would suggest you consider using the less bulky and time consuming sfn citation method; as discussed herein: [2]. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 16:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -Indy beetle (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 14:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta

[edit]

The article Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ethiopian Patriots

[edit]

I found some sources you might find useful, the last one is pay walled: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --Catlemur (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Catlemur: Much appreciated! These will definitely be useful. -Indy beetle (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maurice Mpolo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katanga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Siege of Saïo

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Saïo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HerodotusTheFraud -- HerodotusTheFraud (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Christophe Gbenye.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Christophe Gbenye.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

North Carolina Triangle Wikipedians user group

[edit]

I thought you might be interested in participating in the North Carolina Triangle Wikipedians user group. You can sign up here!--Pharos (talk) 21:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Grandslam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother superior. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marcel Lihau

[edit]

I have written some comments at Talk:Marcel Lihau/GA1‎. I think the article is close to being accepted as "Good". Feel free to respond to any comments if you don't think they would improve the article. AIRcorn (talk) 08:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

[edit]

I believe the only reason it appeared vague was due to my admitted worry that lengthening and providing detail would warrant further conviction toward removing it. The article I got the information from mentioned it as the abandonment of his diffidence in the Senate that he had displayed for the first two months he was there up until that point. - Informant16 March 5, 2017

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For Justin Kokolo - good work!! Buckshot06 (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Louis Bobozo

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Louis Bobozo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing !

[edit]

Thanks for noticing the new article TrumpiLeaks ! What do you think of the article ? Sagecandor (talk) 01:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sagecandor: The article looks to be in pretty good shape, which is impressive, considering the website was launched only earlier today. Wikipedia normally lags behind in keeping up to date on recent news events. I guess you are ahead of the curve! But I do have two observations:
  1. You bring up some quotes from news agencies in the lead to encapsulate the reaction to the website. When they are placed in the article they have more context, explaining who wrote them. I think the standard for Wikipedia is not to write, for example, "Salon wrote of the website" unless the article in question was produced on behalf of Salon as an agency/company, like a statement from the board of editors. Instead, it should say "An editorial on Salon expressed that..." or similar.
  2. The "Inspiration and purpose" section comes before the "Organization" section. This does make sense, as you are wielding it almost like a "Background" but it isn't chronological and could be confusing. For example, it currently reads, "At the time of the website's founding...." Keep in mind the lead is suppose to be a summary of an article, not its formal introduction. So this would raise the question, "What website?" Put simply, the background information should be presented subsequently and chronologically, not retrospectively, unless mentioned after the introduction of the main subject at hand and its history.
Hope this helps! -Indy beetle (talk) 01:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I took your advice and made some more tweaks. Sagecandor (talk) 01:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for your interest in the North Carolina Triangle Wikipedians User Group!

[edit]

Hi Indy_beetle! I'm a representative of the North Carolina Triangle Wikipedians User Group. We're glad you're interested in our activities! If you'd like to stay apprised of what we're up to, we invite you to sign up for our email list. Messages are infrequent (once a month, sometimes less, very occasionally more) and will keep you in the loop about edit-a-thons, discussion topics, and other local Wikimedia-related activities and issues. Please feel free to get in touch with any questions! ~~Sodapopinski7 (talk) 22:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Need sources?

[edit]

I noticed that you're waiting on approval for access to JSTOR at the Wikipedia Library. JSTOR currently has a waitlist due to lack of available accounts. In the meantime, the Resource Exchange can help! We connect content creators with reliable sources. If you need a specific article or passage from a book that you don't have access to, drop by and leave a request. We're happy to help you access paywalled and print sources to the extent allowable by copyright law. Please let me know if you have any questions. ~ Rob13Talk 03:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Ndele

[edit]

Per [my comment here], if this is really an error then change and explain it over at Albert Ndele first. The Albert Ndele article claims (in the succession box) he was prime minister. tahc chat 14:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Apologize for the trouble. I noticed that you were deleting Ndele's service as PM from a number of articles. I decided to help you with that on some more far-flung articles. What exactly was Ndele's service, and why did it formerly say (and all the foreign-language wikipedias STILL say) that he was PM? --Blemby (talk) 15:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ansitz) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Ansitz, Indy beetle!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good. I've linked to the German Wikipedia article on the same topic.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 03:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your continuing work on User:Indy_beetle/Lumumba_Government. Great work!! Buckshot06 (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ONUC

[edit]

Your thoughts welcome on my partial revert at [3]. Did you mean to take out de Witte's writing as well? Buckshot06 (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for something you might know 'where'

[edit]

While I could indulge in abuse in your direction :-) , it looks like you might know where there is an article on a particular subject.

The article Prosopagnosia mentions 'gait' as one possible recognition method for people so afflicted. Since I am and am exquisitely aware of "gait recognition" as a mainstay, I have been puzzled at not being able to find an article on what was termed "dynamic recognition" or "gait analysis" by the FBI (?) / NSA (?). One or both of those agencies got very excited at the idea of recognizing people by simply how they walk and move. Yet there are those of us who always knew about and rely on this technique.

Anyway, I'd wanted to link the word 'gait' in Prosopagnosia to an article on such recognition, and I can't find one. Do you know of one, or perhaps better keywords to search on? Unfortunately, until it moves, I won't recognize it... Shenme (talk) 06:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Shenme: I think you might have missed one something. Try this: gait analysis. -Indy beetle (talk) 01:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Alphonse Songolo

[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Indy beetle, thanks for creating Alphonse Songolo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please move all sources WP:INLINECITE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:06, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Scott

[edit]

Go easy on your edits with the article. Some of your edit justification rationales could be argued as being your own POV, dude. Best regards. Don't take this the wrong way. Reliable references are used via the existing context. Key. :)--Kieronoldham (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If I offended you in any way yesterday, Indy beetle, please accept my apologies. That wasn't my intention. We both have tried to improve the article. If you look deep enough online you can read no shortage of smarmy comments about the subject of the article, about Rachel's Challenge, and a few about the Wiki. article itself. It has been discussed as being a GA nominee and I'd like to see that.--Kieronoldham (talk) 12:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

[edit]

Hi Indy beetle, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

mobutu

[edit]

aren't you interested in working on this article ? 217.107.126.33 (talk) 20:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@217.107.126.33: You are referring to the Mobutu article, no? Well, I suppose its in my domain. I prefer to focus on things before his rule, I've only recently begun exploring the details of his reign. -Indy beetle (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What to do with unreliable sources

[edit]

You removed citations to unreliable sources from Seagoing cowboys. I realize this is an unreliable source, but I thought tagging it with {{better source}} was better than removing it completely. I figured keeping the citation helps readers know where this Wikipedia content is coming from and judge the source for themselves, and points researchers to what sources are available, even if they aren't very good. Is there a Wikipedia guideline on this, or what is your rationale for removing them? Sondra.kinsey (talk) 01:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sondra.kinsey: Hmm, perhaps the better source tag will do. I've done some research about the blog's owner, Peggy Reiff Miller. She's written a single published book (Brethren Press) about one cowboy's travels, The Seagoing Cowboy, as well as at least one article on the subject in the The Mennonite, a newspaper. Still, I'm not sure whether this qualifies her enough as an expert for the blog to be counted as reliable (the publishers of her content are Christian entities with professional staff, but they are not academic publishers) So I suppose the sourcing can be kept but with a tag. -02:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Civil Rights Address

[edit]

Indy: excellent work on this article. I hope you will carry over and edit the main JFK and RFK articles and consider taking on the task on bringing them up to GA status. I have worked on the Civil Rights Address article, as you know and worked on both the JFK and RFK articles over the years. I had hoped to have the time to bring them up to GA, but have not been able to make the time to do so. At any rate, carry on. Kierzek (talk) 13:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kierzek: Much appreciated! Sorry for the late reply, I was tangling with the weeds in the garden. In regards to the Civil Rights Address article, I was planning on finishing the Aftermath section first, then tackling the actual summary of the speech (the hardest part to complete) before nominating it for FA status (I find that the GA process, even if it is less strenuous, takes too long). Once this is done I can move on to the JFK and RFK articles, which, like you, I would like to see become GA status or better. I've done some minor work to the latter but I mostly stay away from such large articles because I find them to be polluted by Good Faith edits, non-linear structure, and inconsistent citation styles. This is why I've stuck to articles on the periphery (On the Mindless Menace of Violence, Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation, Joseph S. Clark's and Robert F. Kennedy's tour of the Mississippi Delta, etc.). I'm also currently working on a rather tedious draft related to another topic, which has kept me busy. Once I'm done with this and the speech article I can certainly devote more time to the JFK and RFK pages. In the meantime, if there's any specific areas I can help with, let me know. I'm in possession of the books Thirteen Days, Robert Kennedy: A Memoir, and RFK: Collected Speeches which can certainly be of use. -Indy beetle (talk) 21:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Free Republic of the Congo

[edit]

[4] - many thanks for this!! You may find writing the Lumumba Government article tedious, but it's important - thanks for all your hard work!! Buckshot06 (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the FP mutiny, I see you're using Kanza 1994. Vanderstraeten 1983 may also be useful. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Buckshot06: Ah, thank you for the suggestion. I was entertaining the creation of a devoted article on the mutiny at some point (Hoskyns 1965 lays out an excellent timeline for it)... However, it would seem that Vanderstraeten has more on the military particulars (like the Belgian intervention) than the political situation. For example, he cites President of the Senate Joseph Ileo as a source when discussing the soldier's demands at the extraordinary council of ministers meeting of 8 July. It's certainly possible that Ileo's assessment was accurate, but he wasn't present at the meeting (unlike the President of the Chamber), a fact that left him quite bitter ([5]). Thomas Kanza, on the other hand, was a minister in the first government and took part in the 8 July deliberations. He lays out the discussions they had quite well in his book, including the debate over who should become army chief of staff. -Indy beetle (talk) 16:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A mutiny article would be great - to match the article on the East African mutinies. Thankyou for your steer regarding Kanza; I should probably dig out a copy. Did you get yours in hard or soft copy? Kind regards and many thanks Buckshot06 (talk) 04:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Buckshot06: I have Kanza in hard copy. I find it easier to manage, plus I'm not sure if electronic copies are available. There aren't many hard copies to begin with—some people will charge over $200 for a hardback—but I was able to find a paperback that suited my purposes for ~$30. Another thing that's nice about Kanza is that he takes a rather uniquely honest approach to the Congo Crisis. He states at the beginning of his book that he tries not to hold any grudges. It also helps that he always saw himself as more of a diplomat than a politician and was never ambitious for power—unlike other key figures—and was friends with people from different factions during the conflict. Now, what are these East African mutinies you speak of? They sound intriguing. -Indy beetle (talk) 05:55, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Uganda People's Defence Force (seems I didn't write the 1964 issue up, as was well known), Tanganyika Rifles, and Kenya Army Infantry, as well as http://www.nytimes.com/1964/01/26/british-put-down-african-mutinies-in-three-nations.html (contemporary report in NYT) Buckshot06 (talk) 08:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
For soldiering on with a often underappreciated, but extraordinarily important subject for the whole of Africa: Congo/Zaire.. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 23

[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017

  • Library card
  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
  • Bytes in brief

Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar of National Merit

[edit]
The Congo Barnstar of National Merit
For Thomas Kanza and other ongoing Congo/Zaire contributions Buckshot06 (talk) 05:07, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo

[edit]

I added the source that served was an image of a sports and general press agency whose archive was destroyed by a bombing in 1941--Tahurus (talk) 00:20, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tahurus: What is the source? I'm confused, as almost nothing has changed on the the file's page at Wikimedia Commons since I nominated it for deletion. -Indy beetle (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image https://abyssiniancrisis.wordpress.com/2015/11/17/ethiopian-army/ was used by sports and general press agency, located in Fleet Street, London but many of their archives were destroyed in a 1941 bombing raid
So it is without copyright that have passed more than 80 years--Tahurus (talk) 00:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Tahurus: Well, first of all, the photo is not more than 80 years old. Even if it was, it wouldn't matter, because the photo is still most likely copyrighted. Note that here it is noted that Alpha Photo Press Ltd owns the rights of the Sport and General Archive. So just because the S&G was mostly destroyed in 1941 doesn't mean the copyright disappeared. -Indy beetle (talk) 01:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover granted

[edit]

Hello, Indy beetle. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Alex ShihTalk 04:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miriam Makeba

[edit]

Greetings, IndyBeetle. As one of the few folks who works in the admittedly large topic of African biography, I wonder if you'd be interested in providing any feedback here. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 09:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Siege of Saïo

[edit]

The article Siege of Saïo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Saïo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HerodotusTheFraud -- HerodotusTheFraud (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For the Siege of Saïo. Fantastic article, well done. Eastfarthingan (talk) 11:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clarader

[edit]

Hello, Indy beetle! I have blocked Clarader as a sock of Karjoyn. There remains one edit by Clarader at the article Second Italo-Ethiopian War which should be undone. I could not use a simple undo because of subsequent edits, and I don't want to try to do it manually because I don't understand all the fine points at that article. I suggest you go repair the article. Thanks! --MelanieN (talk) 18:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Civil rights address

[edit]

You've been continuing to do good detail work on the article. With that said, I was sorry to see you took out my RS cited sentences from Dallek's well regarded work. The point is, there needs to be something said about the speech itself. In other words, there's background on the speech, section on preparing the speech, delivering the speech, aftermath, but nothing on what he actually says. That's what is needed. And that's what that conveyed. If I have time I'll work on it some. Give it some thought. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 02:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page to your post. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 13:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist reviewing award

[edit]
 Military history reviewers' award 
For undertaking one Milhist A-Class Review during the period July to September 2017, you are hereby awarded this Wikistripe. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jacob Wayne Fredericks with Robert F. Kennedy.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jacob Wayne Fredericks with Robert F. Kennedy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign policy of the John F. Kennedy administration

[edit]

Someone put a drive-by tag on the JFK article stating the Southeast Asia (mainly Vietnam) section was overly long and detailed. I helped re-write and edit that section several years ago. I was thinking of moving it in-bulk over to the Foreign policy article as is and keeping a slightly shorter version in the JFK main article. Also what is under the Foreign Policy article for Vietnam at this time is very inadequate. What do you think? Kierzek (talk) 12:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kierzek: Sorry for the delay. Yes, I'd agree with transferring the section in bulk over to the Foreign Policy article, and removing some of those "Main articles" tags. -Indy beetle (talk) 02:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I will wait one more day to see if anyone comments on the JFK talk page and if not, will see that it is done. Kierzek (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillance

[edit]

I have merged most of Wikipedia:WikiProject Espionage and WikiProject Mass surveillance into one interconnected joint project. The new joint talk page is here. There is still a lot of work to get all the different parts of it working properly, but most of it should work. The main page is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Espionage if you want to have a look. Dysklyver 22:54, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 24

[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017

  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
    • Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
  • Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
  • Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

dab on André Lubaya

[edit]

I saw you reverted my edit on André Lubaya to Kasai. You put back a link to a disambiguation page - is there anything on that list which would be a better target for the link or do we need an article on Kasai during the relevant period?— Rod talk 15:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodw: I've redirected Kasai to Kasai region. -Indy beetle (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

[edit]
Hello, Indy beetle.

I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 07:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Precious anniversary

[edit]
A year ago ...
politics in history
... you were recipient
no. 1524 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Alfred Hitchcock's film Psycho

[edit]

Thanks for your edits on Hitchcock's film Psycho. The article was once an FA article back in 2004 but has been subject to periodic neglect. For the past few months, I have made some edits to make it more readable for editors and readers at Wikipedia. Since the article looks a bit better now, it occurred to me that nominating it at FAC might be worthwhile since the article was an FA back in 2004. The instructions at FAC, however, recommend that editors without a peer review under their belt like me should try doing a joint nomination with someone who has done a featured article before. If you might have any interest in this article, then with your 2-3 FA articles maybe you could team with me for a joint FA nomination for Alfred Hitchcock? ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @ManKnowsInfinity:. I'd be happy to help you, though I will admit my knowledge of Hitchcock is limited to a basic understanding of his styles gleaned from a film course I took and viewings of Rear Window and Psycho. Could you clarify, which article you wish to nominate, Psycho or Alfred Hitchcock? -Indy beetle (talk) 21:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for getting back to me on this. The Alfred Hitchcock article appears pretty much ready to go for FA review at this time. Another editor overnight added some images which you might double check to see if you think they are properly done and useful for this biography. Otherwise, your seeing Rear Window and Psycho are two of his finest films and would be well suited for doing a joint FA nomination for the Hitchcock biography article. Since you have done some other FA biography articles, possibly you could let me know if the Hitchcock article is ready for you to join in and make a joint nomination for FA at this time. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Indy beetle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Free Republic of the Congo

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Free Republic of the Congo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SpartaN -- SpartaN (talk) 08:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Safari

[edit]

Hey Indy beetle, I have taken some of the information from your page over to mine, which I have then created a draft for. I have been busy with non-wiki work, and therefore haven't had much time to work on the page. However, if you have time and feel inclined, you should take a look at it. Regards Skjoldbro (talk) 17:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colonial war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zulu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 25

[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017

  • OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great man theory

[edit]

Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:10, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

[edit]
Happy Holidays
Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Free Republic of the Congo

[edit]

The article Free Republic of the Congo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Free Republic of the Congo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SpartaN -- SpartaN (talk) 04:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year 2017

[edit]
 The WikiChevrons 
As nominated by your peers as part of the 2017 Military History Newcomer of the Year Award process, you have been highlighted as an editor who has contributed significantly to the Military history project in 2017. As such, I hereby award you these Wikichevrons. Thank you for your efforts in 2017. AustralianRupert (talk) 02:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Indy_beetle/Archives/2017&oldid=1200832461"