User talk:Ilikewrestling1

Welcome to Wikipedia!

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ilikewrestling1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinite for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=I was not using my account during those strange edits. ~~~~}}.

I blocked your account since either you resorted to large-scale vandalism or someone else has control of your account. If you want to be unblocked, follow the standard procedures to prove that you are back in control of the account.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ilikewrestling1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im back in control if i wasen't i would not be posting this right now. Ilikewrestling1 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

And how can you prove you are back in control of your compromised account? —C.Fred (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ilikewrestling1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im back in control if i wasen't i would not be posting this right now. Ilikewrestling1 (talk) 00:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It does not follow. Either you were in control when the vandalism edits were made, and the block should stand, or there is no way to prove that the vandal is not still currently controlling the account, and the block should stand. —C.Fred (talk) 18:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.