User talk:Idahocool30

Welcome!

Hello, Idahocool30, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, KTVA, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|Let's discuss about the plans 06:09, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to KTVA. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ----Rdp060707|Let's discuss about the plans 06:20, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to KTVA. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ----Rdp060707|Let's discuss about the plans 06:22, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at KTVA. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We as an Alaskan communities Added a few more stuff including a website and a picture for KTVA but it all got changed. We don’t mean any harm for KTVA we just want the information to be correct as there is valuable information and pictures that are missing from the first big box with the television info. We are a group that is trying our best to fix errors like this. Unfortunately we can’t do that if you continue changing the information that we are providing to make the information for KTVA and other Alaska news stations more understandable. We don’t mean to be vandalizing the Alaska news stations Wikipedia page. We just want to fix errors and add valuable information to these news stations even if that means they are not sisters stations or translators at the moment. We want people to know information like this and don’t want to cause any harm. Idahocool30 (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Idahocool30, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Idahocool30! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at KTVA, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to KTVA seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 08:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We as an Alaskan communities Added a few more stuff including a website and a picture for KTVA but it all got changed. We don’t mean any harm for KTVA we just want the information to be correct as there is valuable information and pictures that are missing from the first big box with the television info. We are a group that is trying our best to fix errors like this. Unfortunately we can’t do that if you continue changing the information that we are providing to make the information for KTVA and other Alaska news stations more understandable. We don’t mean to be vandalizing the Alaska news stations Wikipedia page. We just want to fix errors and add valuable information to these news stations even if that means they are not sisters stations or translators at the moment. We want people to know information like this and don’t want to cause any harm. Idahocool30 (talk) 20:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on KTVA. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

This is the Alaskans,

  Why are most of our edits for KTVA being changed in littered five seconds or more. We have a resource that we are pulling stuff from for KTVA but it always seems to not stick for long. Idahocool30 (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like you (singular) are not adding information that is beneficial to the article. You might want to discuss the issues at Talk:KTVA, including sources for the changes, and get assistance with the addition. —C.Fred (talk) 22:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, based on this message you left at User talk:Mvcg66b3r, you should also read WP:No original research. —C.Fred (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - C.Fred. Will do. Idahocool30 (talk) 22:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 01:44, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Idahocool30

A tag has been placed on User:Idahocool30 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 01:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Their name is Legion

Say, @C.Fred:, how do yo feel about a permablock? They " are a group of Alaskans trying to fix and make or old and newer news stations have a better and more understandable content". Cheers, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WE

I'll just leave this here for y'all. Per WP:NOSHARE. "Any user account should represent an individual and not a group (and an individual should normally only have one user account; see next section). Sharing an account – or the password to an account – with others is not permitted, and evidence of doing so will result in the user being required to stop the practice and change their password, or in sanctions (up to and including the account being blocked), depending on circumstances. " Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to see how Idahocool30 proceeds after the block is over. If the individual goes on to edit constructively and doesn't mention "we" or anything else to indicate a shared account, I don't think there's an issue. On the other hand, if behaviour persists that suggests the account is shared, then a block may be in order. —C.Fred (talk) 20:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) requesting unblock ar UTRS appeal #43644. Awaiting response.22:10, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

UTRS appeal #43644 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Idahocool30, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:27, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Idahocool30. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Idahocool30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me and my friend. I had my friend help me create an account because I couldn’t figure out how to create one myself. There may be other reason you blocked me and my friend but in your rules it doesn’t state that my friend can’t help me create an account. You may look at this as sock puppetry but there is nothing that started that my friend couldn’t help set up an account. Plus we se each other a lot so we us the same device most of the time because I get to my friends house and realize I forgot my phone. So please unblock my Friend KTVAAK and Me Idahocool30. You may see people using the same IP address but you are not looking and think about other people in the house too. This black to me and my friend is I recalled for in some ways and you are not taking in to consideration that other people are also using the IP address. If you choose to keep me and my friend blocked then Wikipedia, your administrators, etc. will be sued.Idahocool30 (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you have made a legal threat, you must remain blocked until the threat is withdrawn or you indicate the legal action is concluded. Please see examples of bad unblock requests. If you would like us to consider your request on its merits and work with you, withdraw your threat. 331dot (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Idahocool30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will and have withdrawn the threat from this message. Know please unblock me and my friend. I had my friend help me create an account because I couldn’t figure out how to create one myself. There may be other reason you blocked me and my friend but in your rules it doesn’t state that my friend can’t help me create an account. You may look at this as sock puppetry but there is nothing that is stated in the rule section that my friend couldn’t help set up an account. Plus we see each other a lot so we us the same device most of the time because I get to my friends house and realize I forgot my phone. So please unblock my Friend KTVAAK and Me Idahocool30. You may see people using the same IP address but you are not looking and think about other people in the house too. This block to me and my friend is un recalled for in some ways and you are not taking in to consideration that other people are also using the same IP address.Your company and administrators have not been kind and you have blocked me and my friend because he help me create an account. You can use the rules against us but the rules don’t state that a friend can’t help a person or friend created an account. This to me and my friend is not and was not a necessary block to do.

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please — Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Idahocool30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will and have withdrawn the threat from this message. Know please unblock me and my friend. I had my friend help me create an account because I couldn’t figure out how to create one myself. There may be other reason you blocked me and my friend but in your rules it doesn’t state that my friend can’t help me create an account. You may look at this as sock puppetry but there is nothing that is stated in the rule section that my friend couldn’t help set up an account. Plus we see each other a lot so we us the same device most of the time because I get to my friends house and realize I forgot my phone. So please unblock my Friend KTVAAK and Me Idahocool30. You may see people using the same IP address but you are not looking and think about other people in the house too. This block to me and my friend is un recalled for in some ways and you are not taking in to consideration that other people are also using the same IP address.Your company and administrators have not been kind and you have blocked me and my friend because he help me create an account. You can use the rules against us but the rules don’t state that a friend can’t help a person or friend created an account. This to me and my friend is not and was not a necessary block to do. Idahocool30 (talk) 18:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have the same weird writing style as KTVAAK. It seems unlikely that two people would join Wikipedia and edit the same article with such a weird, idiosyncratic writing style. It is weird. And idiosyncratic. And you repeat things. You repeat them repeatedly. And it is idiosyncratic. You see what I'm saying? Your writing style is verbose and idiosyncratic. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not a company, but a volunteer project. It's certainly plausible that more than one person could be on your IP or even device. But one account was created after the other was blocked, and made similar edits. As we have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer or holding the device at any given moment, we must assume that it was one person evading their block. See WP:MEAT and WP:SHARE. 331dot (talk) 20:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will and have withdrawn the threat from this message. Know please unblock me and my friend. I had my friend help me create an account because I couldn’t figure out how to create one myself. There may be other reason you blocked me and my friend but in your rules it doesn’t state that my friend can’t help me create an account. You may look at this as sock puppetry but there is nothing that is stated in the rule section that my friend couldn’t help set up an account. Plus we see each other a lot so we us the same device most of the time because I get to my friends house and realize I forgot my phone. So please unblock my Friend KTVAAK and Me Idahocool30. You may see people using the same IP address but you are not looking and think about other people in the house too. This block to me and my friend is un recalled for in some ways and you are not taking in to consideration that other people are also using the same IP address.Your company and administrators have not been kind and you have blocked me and my friend because he help me create an account. You can use the rules against us but the rules don’t state that a friend can’t help a person or friend created an account. This to me and my friend is not and was not a necessary block to do. When I got blocked the first time I never did tell my friend until after he signed up for an account. My friend noticed that a picture from KTVA was missing and so he created an account to fix it. At that time I didn’t want to tell him what I was editing and thus is the reason this block got put in. KTVAAK is not connected to my account. My friend wanted to fix things that were being deleted or going missing from The KTVA Wikipedia page. He has been on there before and in the history section on KTVA’s Wikipedia page The name of the person who created KTVA is listed. In his mind the person who founded KTVA is the creator of KTVA. Please just unblock me and KTVAAK. Idahocool30 (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You only need one open request at a time, subsequent comments should be standard, unformatted comments. 331dot (talk) 07:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you add another open unblock request, I will remove your access to this page. Your request is open and visible to administrators, adding additional requests will not get it reviewed faster. One way to get it reviewed faster is to actually address the reason for the block; you may re-edit your existing open request at any time, there is no need to add new requests. If you do have additional comment, they should be standard, unformatted comments. 331dot (talk) 08:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Idahocool30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me and my friend. I had my friend help me create an account because I couldn’t figure out how to create one myself. There may be other reason you blocked me and my friend but in your rules it doesn’t state that my friend can’t help me create an account. You may look at this as sock puppetry but there is nothing that is stated in the rule section that my friend couldn’t help set up an account. Plus we see each other a lot so we us the same device most of the time because I get to my friends house and realize I forgot my phone. So please unblock my Friend KTVAAK and Me Idahocool30. You may see people using the same IP address but you are not looking and think about other people in the house too. This block to me and my friend is un recalled for in some ways and you are not taking in to consideration that other people are also using the same IP address.Your company and administrators have not been kind and you have blocked me and my friend because he help me create an account. You can use the rules against us but the rules don’t state that a friend can’t help a person or friend created an account. This to me and my friend is not and was not a necessary block to do. When I got blocked the first time I never did tell my friend until after he signed up for an account. My friend noticed that a picture from KTVA was missing and so he created an account to fix it. At that time I didn’t want to tell him what I was editing and thus is the reason this block got put in. KTVAAK is not connected to my account. My friend wanted to fix things that were being deleted or going missing from The KTVA Wikipedia page. He has been on there before and in the history section on KTVA’s Wikipedia page The name of the person who created KTVA is listed. In his mind the person who founded KTVA is the creator of KTVA. I do not appreciate your administrators using our writing styles against us and when you are using our writing styles against us you are threatening everyone around your. You may be comparing our writing styles but people also have a lot in common on the writing styles then you think. Me and my friend and other friends of ours have a lot in common on our writing styles because of our teachers we have had. So please just unblock me and KTVAAK and we will show you that we are not here to hurt Wikipedia.we are here to fix and add pictures etc back to Wikipedia.Idahocool30 (talk) 21:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree with the other checkusers and admins. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you are making no progress towards being unblocked, I am removing access. If(more like when) this appeal is declined, you will need to use WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Idahocool30, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:47, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:KYES-DT4

Hello, Idahocool30. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KYES-DT4, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]