User talk:Iconicironic

March 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aafia Siddiqui, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Aafia Siddiqui, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing to the Aafia Siddiqui article violates Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In your latest edit, you cited to blogs, which are not considered reliable sources. This is your last warning. If you persist, you may be blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Aafia Siddiqui, you may be blocked from editing. Auric talk 20:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Aafia Siddiqui, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Auric talk 20:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Codetruth, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Auric talk 20:13, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Aafia Siddiqui shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]