User talk:I.areeb

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Publishers and Distributors

Hello I.areeb,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adam Publishers and Distributors for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Paisarepa (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Rampur, Uttar Pradesh

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Noakhali riots has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Noakhali riots was changed by I.areeb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912763 on 2016-02-26T04:29:28+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Noakhali riots, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Noakhali riots shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W ^talk 10:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]