User talk:I-10
Unblock request(s)
[edit]1st request
[edit]
I-10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I apologize and understand what the consequences I may have done for the entire past and time but if I can't get unblocked right now. Where can editors like us can go? --75.47.219.199 (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It has been made clear that you are block evading as we speak. I can tell just by the edits of the IP 75.47.219.199 - Which has been made obvious is you, you have no intention of changing your ways. Edits like this are unacceptable and you have made it obvious that you cannot stay off of User:AL2TB's recent account, including posting a block tag, reverting his blanking, and editing his RFC constantly. I do not feel that we as a community should allow access back. Mitch32(A fortune in fabulous articles can be yours!) 17:41, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
2nd request
[edit]I-10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I, I-10, understand, convinced, promised and guaranteed that the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and will make useful contributions instead. --75.47.214.136 (talk) 02:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See irony. Dodging your block by logging out, and then requesting an unblock from that logged out address is not going to work. Like, ever. Pardon me while I block your IP address as well. Jayron32 05:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
3rd request
[edit]I-10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My main account has been compromised by Bambifan101. See also Special:Contributions/Golf 2010 for more information why my password got changed by Bambifan101. I am requesting that this block reason to be changed to {{Compromised account}} to avoid inconvenience. --75.47.216.189 (talk) 02:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Please note that further abuse of this template will result in removal of your talk page access. -FASTILYsock(TALK) 03:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
4th request
[edit]I-10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
2nd chance requested. --75.47.200.162 (talk) 03:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Second chance? A review of your block log indicates that you are requesting a twelfth chance. We are very generous with second chances; only a fool gives a twelfth chance to someone who has already shown eleven times that she either cannot or will not follow the rules. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I couldn't help noticing you were evading your block while you made this request, which is further proof that the block is wise. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of U.S. Route 70 in Nevada
[edit]
A tag has been placed on U.S. Route 70 in Nevada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. "Pepper" 13:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of U.S. Route 80 in Nevada
[edit]A tag has been placed on U.S. Route 80 in Nevada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. "Pepper" 13:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
"Senior Bush" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Senior Bush has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 27 § Senior Bush until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)