User talk:I'm on day 4

Welcome!

Hello, I'm on day 4, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 23:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Donald Trump's tweets

The article Donald Trump's tweets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clearly not a topic that warrants its own article, any signifigant material should be covered in Trump's article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 11:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on day 4, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi I'm on day 4! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Talk page on Trump's tweets

Hi, I nominated your page for deletion because redirects don't get talk pages. I only saw it because I nominated the original page for deletion, so it was on my Watch list. Regular users would never have seen it. If you want to discuss spinning off such an article you should propose it on the talk page for the main Trump article or try using the Articles for creation process. While I understand what you're trying to to, in my experience it's unlikely it will stand up as an article on its own. You're probably better off adding a section about it to Trump's page. Hope this helps! JamesG5 (talk) 17:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 02:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Presidents of the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Presidents of the United States was changed by I'm on day 4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870911 on 2017-01-20T19:36:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Barth2032

A tag has been placed on Barth2032 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JamesG5 (talk) 05:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chicago conflict

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chicago conflict, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JamesG5 (talk) 08:47, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crime in Chicago. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Don't make up terms and create articles so you can link to the term. Meters (talk) 08:47, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 08:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. Yintan 08:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Women's March, you may be blocked from editing. JamesG5 (talk) 09:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop accusing me of vandalism when I have not.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 00:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liz Dozier

The article Liz Dozier has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Exemplo347 (talk) 01:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Liz Dozier

The reference in the article seems to make no mention of either Liz Dozier or Chicago Beyond, so does not support the article. There is no indication what Chicago Beyond is, so saying that she is its managing director does not credibly indicate her importance or significance. If you have a better reference and more information about this person, please expand the article. Thanks. PamD 17:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Liz Dozier

A tag has been placed on Liz Dozier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 17:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thaiyana Mali

The article Thaiyana Mali has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Meters (talk) 06:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the BLP PROD. Her social media sites are not considered reliable sources. See WP:RS.Meters (talk) 06:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thaiyana Mali

A tag has been placed on Thaiyana Mali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Meters (talk) 07:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mali–Thailand relations

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Mali–Thailand relations, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 02:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mali–Thailand relations

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mali–Thailand relations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Paul_012 (talk) 07:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Feel free to create an article on the subject, even if this version is deleted. But please remember that it must contain more content than just a re-iteration of the title. Happy editing! --Paul_012 (talk) 07:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, :).--I'm on day 4 (talk) 06:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Romanian Revolution 2

The article Romanian Revolution 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. Uncredited c&p from 2017 Romanian protests. WP:NPOV...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 08:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2024 (campaign slogan)

The article 2024 (campaign slogan) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable blip on the social networking radar.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 02:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 2024 (campaign slogan)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2024 (campaign slogan). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kanye West. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kanye West – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 02:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may delete then, although it was not an attack page.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't create any inappropriate pages. If you read the policies like I did we would not be talking about this.

Your contributed article, Romanian Revolution 2

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Romanian Revolution 2. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2017 Romanian protests. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2017 Romanian protests – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Meters (talk) 04:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pitt County Board of Commissioners. Yet another completely unsourced article about virtually nothing. You copied the first line from their webpage, and most of the rest of what you wrote is contradicted by what is on their webpage. If you can't be bothered to create a real article don't create anything. Meters (talk) 07:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Io games for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Io games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Io games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions}) 05:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Strange Thing About the Johnsons

The article The Strange Thing About the Johnsons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy film notability guidelines with no information about what the movie is or how it "went viral". Not a useful addition to the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anime in hip hop

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Anime in hip hop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HapHaxion (talk) 05:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the speedy deletion of this page, but I still think it deserves deletion. See below. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anime in hip hop

The article Anime in hip hop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article does not establish that this is a notable topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of lists of lists of lists on Wikipedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as List of lists of lists of lists on Wikipedia, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JTtheOG (talk) 03:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IWillBuildTheRoads (talk) 04:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obamagate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Obamagate. Since you had some involvement with the Obamagate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move current pages without seeking consensus on article talk page

Like you did here. --QEDK (愛) 15:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move the page again without seeking concensus. We have a naming precedent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2017_Westminster_terror_attack Seddon ^talk 15:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm QEDK. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do not call other editors with views you regard as defamatory. QEDK (愛) 15:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Rules for Rulers

A tag has been placed on The Rules for Rulers, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TopCipher (talk) 06:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Student government party

Hello, I'm on day 4. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Student government party, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Student government party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Student government party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Student government party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Student government political party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Non-violent non-state actor

The article Non-violent non-state actor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

In addition to having a bad link, this doesn't really require an article, only a mention in an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:19, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Non-violent non-state actor

A tag has been placed on Non-violent non-state actor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:NOT#DICTIONARY Insufficient content to justify article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — IVORK _Discuss 03:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm SQL. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! SQL ^{Query me!} 05:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What article?--I'm on day 4 (talk) 06:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Internal conflict in the United States

Sources, please.Xx236 (talk) 13:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Internal conflict in the United States

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Internal conflict in the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jake Brockman (talk) 14:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:David Dao for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prods

Hello. WP:AFD is not the same as WP:PROD. PRODs are for uncontroversial deletion. They are almost never usable for articles which have been previously nominated for deletion at AFD. r/The Donald has been nominated twice: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//r/The Donald and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R/The Donald. If someone contests a prod by removing the notice, that's also enough to make it controversial, thus ending the prod. Don't reprod an article, it's a waste of time and could be seen as disruptive. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 06:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 06:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of .io games

A tag has been placed on .io games, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 20:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Poietic Generator. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop adding your unsourced commentary to articles. Meters (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the sources that exist would have been more productive, but i'll stop like you asked.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 18:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's your point? If you can't be bothered to do it yourself no one else is going to source questionable edits like these for you. And I doubt that most of them could even be sourced, or that they would survive in the articles even if they were sourced. "It has been heavily researched in academia, including Cornell." Who says so? And what's special about Cornell? Why would we make a point of mentioning Cornell? And why is this worth mentioning in the article at all, let alone in the lede? Meters (talk) 20:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it on the application's website.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 21:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)--I'm on day 4 (talk) 21:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:RS. That's not an independent source. And since you didn't link to it I have no way of verifying that it really says that. I have my doubts. Are you sure you're not conflating Conway's Game of Life (which probably is associated with Cornell) with Poietic Generator? The article makes no mention of this work being associated with Cornell. Meters (talk) 23:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Clinton v. Jones. Mz7 (talk) 21:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was hidden, sorry.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 23:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern North Carolina Militia

Eastern North Carolina Militia article should be created.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Swarmation

Hello I'm on day 4,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Swarmation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TheLongTone (talk) 13:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Competitive programming, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding unsourced or irrelevant information. This link http://dev.generals.io/faq does absolutely nothing to source the claim "There are several organizations who host programming competitions on a regular basis." Meters (talk) 22:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association

Please immediately explain on the talk page what you considered unbalanced about this article, or the template will be removed. This template is only to be used if you think there is a serious WP:NPOV issue, and the issue should be explained on teh talk page. Meters (talk) 22:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still no explanation on the talk page or here. Tag removed. Meters (talk) 21:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gilberton, Pennsylvania ‎. Stop adding your opinions or stuff you saw online. If you don't have a reliable source then don't add it. And no, you can't add something contentious such as "A significant proportion of the town are members of a local militia", tag it as needing a citation yourself, and expect it to stay in the article. Meters (talk) 23:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fourth-generation warfare ‎. Don't add garbage to articles even if you then take it out. Meters (talk) 23:52, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop messing around. Mexican Drug War is not "Currently one of the deadliest ongoing armed conflicts" and Mexican Indignados Movement is not an orphan article. It is linked to by articles and templates. Meters (talk) 00:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Look up the number of deaths per year.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 21:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. If you make a claim such as that you have to provide a reliable source. You have been warned repeatedly about making unsourced claims. Who exactly said that it was one of the deadliest ongoing conflicts? If no-one said that then you are engaging in WP:OR or WP:SYNTH at best, or even worse simply stating your opinion.

And you still have not explained why you tagged as an orphan an article that is linked to by more than 300 articles. Meters (talk) 21:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mumble rap

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mumble rap requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Dane ^talk 22:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Important videos

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Important videos. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of most viewed YouTube videos. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of most viewed YouTube videos. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Home Lander (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Deb. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Home Lander (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is very hypocritical. I am being accused of attacking because I asked someone who appears was actually harming the community to stop and when I read the guide you provided it said do not attack because it harms the community.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 20:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't bother me that you disagree with something I've done (you didn't say what it was, so I don't know). But I would really recommend, for your own sake, that you get a few more constructive edits under your belt before you start picking fights. Deb (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most of my edits are constructive, overall you probably do good, it's just that the statements on your page are very snobby and uppity and elitist.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 20:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further advice

Please read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Deb (talk) 22:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2020, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meters (talk) 23:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop creating these unsourced, useless articles. Really, we have multiple polls between Kanye West and Donald Trump for the 2020 election? Meters (talk) 23:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even understand what a poll is? Meters (talk) 02:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

talk pages

Please read WP:TALK. I had to move your post on Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2020 since you inserted it into the middle of another editor's post. Meters (talk) 23:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you move it too.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 20:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Try looking at the thread. I moved it [1] to the bottom of the thread, where you should have put it, all of 4 lines further down. You really need to read talk page threads before you respond. You were responding to a two-month-old post that had already been dealt with. Meters (talk) 20:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution

Google searches will give different results to different people for the same search criteria. Those results are not likely to meet wp:reliable source. Please do not use. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, did you replace with any of the references listed hopefully?--I'm on day 4 (talk) 16:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Replacement Remixes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Replacement Remixes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Replacement Remixes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. editorEهեইдအ😎 17:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you linking Talk:Replacement Remixes to its own article? That would not belong on any talk page, let alone its own talk page. It makes no sense. I've removed it. Meters (talk) 02:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I provided convenience.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 01:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do that. Meters (talk) 01:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Judicial independence, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Autocracy under Donald Trump

A tag has been placed on Autocracy under Donald Trump requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KarlPoppery (talk) 04:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Presidency of Donald Trump. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It's bad enough that you write these garbage articles such as Autocracy under Donald Trump but don't link to them. It just gives us more to do when the things are deleted.

Nomination of Autocracy under Donald Trump for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Autocracy under Donald Trump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autocracy under Donald Trump until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SMP0328. (talk) 04:10, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

bad-faith editing

Hi. I hope by now you've noticed that many of your edits are being reverted. This is because you're editing however you like, not how Wikipedia recommends. If you can't be bothered to be a constructive editor then I recommend you quit, because we may eventually run you off. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mumble rap. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. How many times do we have to ask you to stop making these unsourced edits? Don't add your WP:OR or your opinions to articles. If a reliable source made the comment then it might be worth including, with the source. Otherwise leave it out. Meters (talk) 03:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to History of the entire world, i guess. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That absolutely was not vandalism. Don't even insult it like that.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting an apology.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GamerGate

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of See You Again (music video)

A tag has been placed on See You Again (music video) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

So, did you make the 'mumble rap' page? Jakey7680X (talk) 21:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it was deleted, than recreated about a week later by somebody else. I also crated Ad lib rap.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 02:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ad lib rap

The article Ad lib rap has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no indication this is anything but WP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Sorry (Justin Bieber music video)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Sorry (Justin Bieber music video). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Sorry_(Justin_Bieber_song)#Music_video. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sorry_(Justin_Bieber_song)#Music_video. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You do not already have an article for it.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 00:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Generals.io

Hello I'm on day 4,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Generals.io for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Your talk page is littered with cautions from other editors about less-than-useful edits, and about articles you created which are destined for deletion. I just reverted this edit where you added to the Kodak Black article that "His cousin is a football player at ECU" (with a source). Wikipedia is not a repository of vacuous information; it's an encyclopedia used by millions, and many of its editors are very dedicated. These same editors also care far more about the project--in my experience and opinion--than about any one particular editor who does not appear to care much about "getting it". At the top of your talk page is a welcome message with many useful links. I urge you to read it, so you can improve your editing skills and reduce the amount of time other editors are expending on your edits. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, thank you.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 03:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anime in hip hop

A tag has been placed on Anime in hip hop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Backendgaming (talk) 07:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anime in hip hop

A tag has been placed on Anime in hip hop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Backendgaming (talk) 21:48, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anime in hip hop

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Anime in hip hop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Backendgaming (talk) 21:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anime in hip hop

A tag has been placed on Anime in hip hop, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Backendgaming (talk) 04:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of See You Again (music video) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article See You Again (music video) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/See You Again (music video) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chase (talk | contributions) 21:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]