User talk:Hughf2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr AK Fulton (December 6)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr AK Fulton.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FairyTailRocks (talk) 09:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr AK Fulton (December 6)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr AK Fulton.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FairyTailRocks (talk) 09:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Dr AK Fulton was accepted

Dr AK Fulton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Hughf2, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Cordially, Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Our five pillars • A tutorial • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments • Help desk • Teahouse • Help directory Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • List of guidelines • Three-revert rule • Copyrights Image use policy • Policy for non-free content • Notability • Deletion policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Conflict of interest • Sock puppetry

Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation The perfect article • Peer review • Featured content
The community
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Build consensus • Resolve disputes • No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump • Signpost • IRC channels
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages • Portals Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts Awards that registered contributors can achieve and award

November 2022

Thanks for contributing to the article 92nd (Gordon Highlanders) Regiment of Foot. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 08:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gregor Fraser moved to draftspace

It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of Gregor Fraser, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for input, feedback, etc, the article on Fraser was rejected firstly for not being "noteworthy", now its been rejected for COI - can you kindly assist, on what specific grounds is there a COI? Thanks in anticipation. Hughf2 (talk) 09:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gregor Fraser

Hello, Hughf2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gregor Fraser, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gregor Fraser

Hello, Hughf2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gregor Fraser".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Editing the user page of another user is generally seen as impolite, so I thought I should explain.

Userbox templates are intended to be added to a user page, so I moved the COI userbox template from the Adam Fulton article to your user page
Doing this obviously removed the redirect – the userbox provides the necessary link instead
I added the correct COI template to the article instead of the userbox template
I also added the COI template to the Adam Kelso Fulton article. You should add a statement about that article to your user page (and probably the article talk pages).
References exist to allow other users to verify the information. While the source material need not be on-line, it does need to be in the public domain and verifiable by other users. As such, you do need to add some "better" references or review what text should be removed from the articles.

I hope that this helps — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 08:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks GhostInTheMachine for your assistance, do you have examples of how to craft the statement? Hughf2 (talk) 10:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just add a second userbox for Adam Kelso Fulton or maybe add the other page as parameter 2 on the existing userbox — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 15:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your kind assistance - Ill update soon - regards Hughf2 (talk) 07:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Fulton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Fulton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Fulton (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]