User talk:Hugh Giant

Welcome!

Hello, Hugh Giant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Denis Cyr— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 02:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denis Cyr

There were a few problems with your edit. If you look at the article before your edit and as a result of your edit, you will notice a large number of wp:redlinks. Those are links to article names that don't exist. Articles should have very few, if any redlinks. You changed the wp:infobox - wp:template from template:Infobox ice hockey player Template:Infobox Teacher. As you can see from the redlink of the latter, it doesn't exist. There are a number of options. See Category:People and person infobox templates. Perhaps template:infobox person would be acceptable. A wp:biography of living persons does not need to have an infobox, but it is generally a good idea as it help format things and allows for easier updating.
A second issue is that you are using yourself as a source of information. Is is called wp:original research which states: Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist.. Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Remember, Wikipedia should be written for the layperson. I was not following much of your article. I have no idea what a "Teacher shooter" "BDL career", "facial", "swallow" are. Such jargon should be described or linked to. I could find no mention of "No Errors Association" Your content under "Citations" is quite cryptic.
Please consider asking at the wp:teahouse as I am not always available. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]