User talk:Hoasaigon
Your draft article: Draft:Guru Mahendra
[edit]Hi @Hoasaigon
Your article Draft:Guru Mahendra currently cites only primary sources. Every fact and statement in your article needs to be backed up by independent and reliable sources. This is so anyone can verify that the statements in your article are accurate and to ensure that your topic is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia.
It might be worth reading Wikipedia:Your first article which gives you the dos and don'ts of creating an article, plus the Wikipedia:Citing sources guide that explains how to cite sources.
The easiest way to fix your article is to find reliable, independent, secondary sources that cover Guru Mahendra in detail, and then summarise them in your own words. That should make up the content of your article draft. Note that the sources must be:
- - Reliable: Your article should rely on strong, reliable sources that are published by reputable institutions. Primary sources can be used for basic facts (such as a date of birth), but they should be supplemented with strong secondary sources that offer analysis or interpretation.
- - Independent: Your sources should be independent of the subject, for example not self-published or from the subject's own website.
- - Show significant coverage: Your subject should be discussed in detail in the sources you find. The sources should provide in-depth information or analysis about the subject, going beyond basic facts or promotional material.
- - From multiple places: You should find at least three separate reliable, independent, secondary sources that discuss your subject.
- - Not original research: Wikipedia articles should summarise existing knowledge about a subject, not present new research. This means you should avoid drawing your own conclusions or analyses from the sources. Stick to summarising what the sources say in a neutral tone.
Remember that your article should be written from a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
If you cannot find multiple, reliable, and independent sources then I am afraid that Guru Mahendra would not meet the notability threshold at this time and therefore cannot have a Wikipedia article. Remember that Wikipedia is not a place for any type of self-promotion or advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia: not an advertising platform, directory, or a way to promote a subject.
Finally, please note that if you are connected in any way to Guru Mahendra then you must declare your Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here: Get help at the Teahouse
Hope that helps, Qcne (talk) 08:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Guru Mahendra
[edit]Hello, Hoasaigon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guru Mahendra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC)