User talk:Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

N — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.125.58.85 (talk) 18:57, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Username (Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm)

Hello Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, unfortunately the username you have picked is inappropriate. Please consider changing it. You can do this by following the instructions at the Changing username page or by just creating a new account. Note that changing your username will allow you to keep your current edits credited to you. If you do not change your username, a Wikipedia administrator may block this account. If you feel this message is a mistake and your username does not violate the rule, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dar-Ape 21:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Mission Africa

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mission Africa, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mundus.ac.uk. As a copyright violation, Mission Africa appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mission Africa has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Mission Africa. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Mission Africa, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. John Reaves 02:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:1127836460.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1127836460.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Archbishop Alan Harper

No problem. Thanks for the thanks! Doops | talk 08:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Clarke (minister)

Please consider placing A tag has been placed on David Clarke (minister), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Labrt2004 04:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for the tag to be removed, as I think it may not have been noticed what the significance of the position is. But you had bettter get some info & refs in there very fast. DGG 06:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And the idea is to add material, not remove what little there is. I am not clear what you are trying to accomplish. If you want to get articles about this ecclesiastics established in WP, this is not the way to go about it. The way is to make a solid well-referenced article offline, and then put it in so the people who dont know one church from another can not misunderstand.DGG 08:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of Image:Eur_20041214_tues3art.jpg

I notice you've included Image:Eur_20041214_tues3art.jpg in Ian Paisley. The copyright tag on this image indicates that it's a screen capture from a TV broadcast. This type of image can be used on Wikipedia only in accordance with "fair use" provisions of copyright law, which (in this case) means that it is only fair use if the purpose is to illustrate the TV programme. It seems to me that this is illustrating Dr Ian Paisley, rather than the TV programme he was appearing in.

I'm listing this on copyright problems so that other people can comment. Feel free to comment there. Sam Blacketer 19:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eur_20041214_tues3art.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eur_20041214_tues3art.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 02:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Paul Bailie

An editor has nominated the article Paul Bailie for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Bailie. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Paul Bailie during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 15:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eames-biog.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Eames-biog.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 18:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:JWArthur.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:JWArthur.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

John Ward Armstrong - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Arthur Memorial.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Banguru.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Captainartur.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Church of the Torch.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]